Skip to main content
Log in

When Pains are Mental Objects

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Why pains are not mental objects (1998) Guy Douglasrightly argues that pains are modes rather than objects ofperceptions or sensations. In this paper I try to go a stepfurther and argue that there are circumstances when pains canbecome objects even while they remain modes of experience.By analysing cases of extreme pain as presented by Scarry,Sartre, Wiesel, Grahek and Wall, I attempt to show thatintense physical pain may evolve into a force that, likeimagination, can make our most intense state of experiencebecome a mental object. I shall finally argue that, thoughextreme pains cannot serve as paradigm cases, they do showthe general importance of taking pain states to be objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Douglas, G. (1998): ‘Why Pains are not Mental Objects’, Philosophical Studies 91(2), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, C.R. (1991): ‘The Neurophilosophy of Pain’, Philosophy 66(255), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahek, N. (1995): ‘The Sensory Dimension of Pain’, Philosophical Studies 79, 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahek, N. (2001): Feeling Pain and Being in Pain, Oldenburg: Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V.G. (1997): ‘When a Pain is not’, The Journal of Philosophy XCIV(8), 381–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langsam, R. (1995): ‘Why Pains are Mental Objects’, in The Journal of Philosophy XCII(6), 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1998): ‘Pain’, in R.L. Gregory (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind (pp. 574–575), Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. and Katz, J. (1994): ‘Pain Measurement in Persons in Pain’, in P.D. Wall and R. Melzack (eds.), Textbook of Pain (pp. 337–357), Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, N. (1986): ‘Pains and Pain Sensations’, The Journal of Philosophy LXXXIII(3), 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, A. (2002): ‘When Pain Becomes Unreal’, Philosophy Today 2(46), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1957): ‘The Wall’, in W. Kaufman (ed.), Existentialism, London: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1961): The Psychology of Imagination, New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985): The Body in Pain. The Making and Unmaking of the World, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P.D. (1994): ‘The Placedo and the Placedo Response’, in P.D. Wall and R. Melzack (ed.), Textbook of Pain (pp. 297–1308), Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. (2000): Pain: The Science of suffering, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, E. (1982): Night, New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olivier, A. When Pains are Mental Objects. Philosophical Studies 115, 33–53 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024919818322

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024919818322

Keywords

Navigation