Skip to main content
Log in

Destructive Effect of DNA Topoisomerase II Inhibitor Vepesid on Mouse Spermatogenesis

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II with vepesid induced structural and functional reorganization of chromatin in meiotically dividing spermatocytes I, which later led to the block of their differentiation and long-lasting disorders in spermatogenesis. Vepesid induced decondensation of spermatocyte I chromatin, block of desynapsis, and elongation of lateral elements of spermatocyte autosome synaptonemal complexes during late pachytene and diplotene of meiosis. This confirms the involvement of type II DNA topoisomerase in chromatin condensation and homologous chromosome desynapsis at the stage of diplotene and the role of this enzyme in structural organization of the synaptonemal complex. Vepesid induced the formation of dichotomy and breaks of the pericentromer regions of subelements of lateral elements of the autosomal synaptonemal complexes; the number of cells with associations of axial elements of sex chromosomes with autosomal synaptonemal complexes increased, univalents of autosomes and sex chromosomes appeared. Mesna, a modifier of toxic effects of antitumor drugs, had no toxic effect on spermatogenic cells. Mesna reduced the lethal effect of vepesid during combined treatment, but did not ensure long-term protection of spermatogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. A. Bogush, E. Yu. Koldaeva, G. B. Smirnova, et al., Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 132,No. 9, 301-305 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. D. Gol'dberg, T. G. Borovskaya, E. A. Timina, et al., Ibid., 124,No. 2, 645-648 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. V. Sukhacheva, O. L. Kolomiets, and E. F. Loseva, Ibid., 125,No. 1, 84-88 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Chen and F. J. Longo, Mol. Reprod. Dev., 45,No. 1, 61-71 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Cobb, M. Miyaike, A. Kikuchi, and M. A. Handel, Chromosoma, 108, 412-425 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Forejt, Serono Clin. Colloq. Reprod., 3, 135-151 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Handel and R. K. Reddy, Biol. Reprod., 52, 192 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kallio and J. Lдhdetie, Mutagenesis, 11,No. 5, 435-443 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Lдhdetie, A. Keiski, A. Suutari, and J. Toppari, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 24,No. 3, 192-202 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Links and C. Lewis, Drugs, 57,No. 3, 293-308 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. del Mazo and L. Gil-Alberdi, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 41, 219-224 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. B. Moens and W. C. Earnshaw, Chromosoma, 98, 317-322 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Navarro, F. Vidal, M. Quitart, et al., Human Genet., 59, 419-423 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. B. Rattner, M. J. Hendzel, C. S. Furbee, et al., J. Cell Biol., 134,No. 5, 1097-1107 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Rose and C. Holm, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13,No. 6, 3445-3455 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sukhacheva, T.V., Bogush, T.A. & Kolomiets, O.L. Destructive Effect of DNA Topoisomerase II Inhibitor Vepesid on Mouse Spermatogenesis. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 135, 464–469 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024919510096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024919510096

Navigation