Abstract
The name diffusion of candidates seeking the 1992 Democratic presidential nomination as a function of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary is investigated in a survey among panel participants from a midwestern community. Controlling for political interest and media dependency predispositions, the comparative influence of media exposure and interpersonal discussion is demonstrated. In general, interpersonal communication influences are found to be dependent on media coverage dynamics, either complementing media effects when they are strong or substituting for media effects when they are nonexistent. The consequences for the party nomination “momentum” model, especially in regard to candidate viability, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, William C. (1987). As New Hampshire goes... In Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby, (eds.), (pp. 42–59). Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Arterton, F. Christopher (1978a). Campaign organizations confront the media-political environment. In James David Barber (eds.), Race for the Presidency (pp. 3–24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Arterton, F. Christopher (1978b). The media politics of presidential campaigns: A study of the Carter nomination drive. In James David Barber (ed.), Race for the Presidency (pp. 25–54). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baker, Ross K. (1993). Sorting out and suiting up: The presidential nominations. In Gerald M. Pomper (ed.), The Election of 1992 (pp. 39–73). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Bartels, Larry M. (1988). Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, Larry M. (1989). After Iowa: Momentum in presidential primaries. In Peverill Squire (ed.), The Iowa Caucuses and the Presidential Nominating Process (pp. 121–148). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Behr, Roy, and Shanto Iyengar (1985). Television news, real world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 38–57.
Bennett, Linda L. M., and Stephen E. Bennett (1989). Enduring gender differences in political interest: The impact of socialization and political dispositions. American Politics Quarterly 17: 105–122.
Berelson, Bernard B., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brady, Henry E., and Richard Johnson (1987). What's the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism? In Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics (pp. 127–186). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Erbring, L., E. Goldenberg, and A. Miller (1980). Front-page news and real world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science 24: 16–49.
Flanigan, William, and Nancy H. Zingale (1988). Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 6th ed. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, Publishers.
Gallup, George, Jr. (1992). The Gallup Poll, 1991. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Gallup, George, Jr. (1993). The Gallup Poll, 1992. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Hayes, Bernadette C., and Clive S. Bean (1993). Gender and local political interest: Some international comparisons. Political Studies 41: 672–682.
Katz, Elihu, and J. J. Feldman (1962). The debates in light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (ed.), The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 173–223). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Kerbel, Matthew R. (1994). Edited for Television: CNN, ABC, and the 1992 Presidential Campaign. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Kessel, John H. (1988). Presidential Campaign Politics: Coalition Strategies and Citizen Response, 3rd ed. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
Lenart, Silvo (1994). Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Matthews, Donald R. (1978). “Winnowing”: The news media and the 1976 presidential nominations. In James David Barber (ed.), Race for the Presidency (pp. 55–78). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Niemi, Richard G., and Jane Junn (1993). Civics courses and political knowledge of high school seniors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2.
Orren, Gary R., and Nelson W. Polsby (1987). New Hampshire: springboard of nomination politics. In Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics (pp. 1–7). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Patterson, Thomas E. (1980). The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
Robinson, John P., and Mark R. Levy (1986). Interpersonal communication and news comprehension. Public Opinion Quarterly 40:304–339.
Rogers, E. M., and J. W. Dearing (1987). Agenda-setting research: Where it has been, where is it heading? In J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 11 (pp. 555–594). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Tedin, Kent L., David W. Brady, and Arnold Vedlitz (1977). Sex differences in political attitudes and behavior: The case for situational factors. Journal of Politics 39: 448–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenart, S. Naming Names in a Midwestern Town: The Salience of Democratic Presidential Hopefuls in Early 1992. Political Behavior 19, 365–382 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899822814
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899822814