Skip to main content
Log in

Differential tolerance of high manganese among rapeseed genotypes

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultivation of crop cultivars resistant to high soil manganese (Mn) may reduce the negative effects of Mn toxicity on crop yield. Three studies were carried out to select Brassica genotypes (B. napus and B. rapa) resistant to high Mn concentration and to characterise the nature of any Mn resistance found. In Experiment 1, 33 B. napus and nine B. rapa genotypes were screened in a sub-irrigated nutrient solution system. Based on visual symptoms and plant size, single plants were identified with resistance to high Mn from within cultivars of four B. napus and one B. rapa. Resistance was also identified in one B. napus doubled haploid genotype. In Experiment 2, a genotype resistant to high Mn and two genotypes (progenies from Experiment 1) sensitive to high Mn were exposed to eight Mn concentrations (9–500 μM) for 2 weeks in nutrient solution. The relative shoot weight (RSW) and the relative root weight (RRW) of the genotype resistant to Mn were significantly greater at ≥100 μM Mn than both genotypes sensitive to high Mn; the sensitive genotypes reacted similarly. The three genotypes had similar tissue Mn contents and the elevated Mn tissue contents did not induce deficiencies of Mg or Fe. In Experiment 3, 12 genotypes (progenies from Experiment 1) were screened in nutrient solution at 9 μM Mn and with an additional 125 μM Mn. The RRW and RSW of the genotypes ranged from 35 to 114 and 39 to 94%, respectively. All the selections sensitive to high Mn had a RSW <60% and thus were confirmed to be Mn sensitive, while all the selections resistant to Mn had a RSW >70% and thus were confirmed as Mn resistant. This evidence confirmed the availability of rapeseed germplasm resistant to Mn toxicity with an ability to withstand high content of Mn through internal tissue tolerance. Also, the observed Mn tolerance in this material is genetically controlled and not an artifact of our screening assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew C S 1974 Automatic sub-irrigation sand culture technique for comparative studies in plant nutrition. Lab. Pract. 23, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew C S and Hegarty M P 1969 Comparative responses to manganese excess of eight tropical and four temperate pasture legume species. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 20, 687–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aso K 1902 On the physiological influence of manganese compounds on plants. Bull. Coll. Agric. Tokyo 2, 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp E G and Rossi N 1972 Effects of Mn and Fe supply on the growth of barley in nutrient solution. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52, 575–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey F P C, Joyce D C, Edwards D G and Asher C J 1986 Role of trichomes in sunflower tolerance to manganese toxicity. Plant Soil 91, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnason E N, Hanger B C and Osborn R K 1972 Yellow patches in oilseed rape crops. Aust. Plant Pathol. Newslett. 1, 30.

  • Brenchley W E 1914 Inorganic Plant Poisons and Stimulants. pp. 78–107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield S M, Cumming R W M, David D J and Williams C H 1983 Change in soil pH, manganese and aluminium under subterranean clover pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 23, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C and Jones W E 1977 Fitting plants nutritionally to soils. I. Soybeans. Agron. J. 69, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman G W1931 The relation of iron and manganese to chlorosis in plants. New Phytol. 30, 266–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark R B 1982 Plant response to mineral element toxicity and de-ficiency. In Breeding Plants for Less Favorable Environments. Eds. M N Christiansen and C F Lewis. pp. 71–142. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton R T and Sykes J D 1992 Canola. Agfact P5.2.1 (4th ed). New South Wales Agriculture, Australia. 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers M K, Uren N C, Helyar K R, Poile G J and Cullis B R 1997 Temporal variation in soil acidity. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35, 1115–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekock P C and Inkson R H E 1962 Manganese content of mustard leaves in relation to iron and major nutrient supply. Plant Soil 17, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elamin O M and Wilcox G E 1986a Effects of magnesium and manganese on muskmelon growth and manganese toxicity. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111, 582–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elamin OMand Wilcox G E 1986b Effects of magnesium and manganese nutrition on watermelon growth and manganese toxicity development. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111, 588–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Jaoual T and Cox D A 1998 Manganese toxicity in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 21, 353–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Scott B J and Lill W J 1986 Manganese tolerance in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) genotypes grown with nitrate or symbiotic nitrogen. Plant Soil 97, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton G, Helyar K, Abbott T and Orchard P 1996 Soil acidity and liming. Agfact AC.19 (2nd ed). New South Wales Agriculture, Australia. 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A L 1989 Enhanced Mn accumulation by snapbean cultivars under Fe stress. J. Plant Nutr. 12, 715–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D 1984 Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soil. In Soil Acidity and Liming (2nd ed). Ed. F Adams. pp. 57–97. Agronomy Monograph No. 12. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978. The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Scott B J and Fisher J A 1988 Genetic differences in plant tolerance to manganese toxicity. In International Symposium on Manganese in Soils and Plants. Eds. R D Graham, R J Hannan and N C Uren. pp. 293–307. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Webb H W and Jones J E 1981 Adaptation of cotton genotypes to an acid, manganese toxic soil. Agron. J. 73, 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Weil R R and Coradetti C A 1995 Differential manganese tolerances of cotton genotypes in nutrient solution. J. Plant Nutr. 18, 685–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez K A and Gomez A A 1984 Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, (2nd ed). International Rice Research Institute. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 680 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmanis V O and Leeper G W 1966 Toxic manganese in nearneutral soils. Plant Soil 25, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heenan D P and Campbell L C 1981 Influence of potassium and manganese on growth and uptake of magnesium by soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr. cv Bragg). Plant Soil 61, 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horiguchi T 1987 Mechanism of manganese toxicity and tolerance of plants. II. Deposition of oxidized manganese in plant tissues. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 33, 595–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst W J 1982 Quick screening of cowpea genotypes for manganese tolerance during vegetative and reproductive growth. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenk. 145, 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst W J 1983 Factors responsible for genotypic manganese tolerance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Plant Soil 72, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst W J 1988 The physiology of manganese toxicity. In Manganese in Soils and Plants. Eds. R D Graham, R J Hannam and N C Uren. pp. 175–188. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J B, Jr. 1991 Plant tissue analysis in micronutrients. In Micronutrients in Agriculture, (2nd ed). Eds. J J Mortvedt, F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp. 477–521. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisling T C, Thompson L F and Slabaugh W R 1984 Visual symptoms and tissue manganese concentrations associated with manganese toxicity in wheat. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15, 537–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohno Y, Foy C D, Fleming A L and Krizek D T 1984 Effect of Mn concentration on the growth and distribution of Mn and Fe in two bush bean cultivars grown in solution culture. J. Plant Nutr. 7, 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C R 1972 Interrelationships of aluminum and manganese on the potato plant. Agron. J. 64, 546–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J 1978 Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions-a historical overview. In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions. Ed. G A Jung. pp. 161–171. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No. 32. Madison, WI, USA.

  • Lohnis M P 1960 Effect of magnesium and calcium supply on the uptake of manganese by various plants. Plant Soil 12, 339–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfie S M, Taylor G J, Briggs K G and Hoddinot J 1989 Differential tolerance of manganese among cultivars of Triticum aestivum. Can. J. Bot. 67, 1305–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2 edition. Academic Press, London, UK. 889 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan C R 1948 Effect of molybdenum on the severity of toxicity symptoms in flax induced by excess of either manganese, zinc, copper, nickel or cobalt in the nutrient solution. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 5, 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan C R 1949 Effect on flax of a toxic concentration of boron, iron, molybdenum, aluminium, copper, zinc, manganese, cobalt, or nickel in the nutrient solution. R. Soc. Victoria Pro. 61, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroni J S, Briggs K G and Taylor G J 1991a Chlorophyll content and leaf elongation rate in wheat seedlings as a measure of manganese tolerance. Plant Soil 136, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroni J S, Briggs K G and Taylor G J 1991b Pedigree analysis of the origin of manganese tolerance in Canadian spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Euphytica 56, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris H D and Pierre W H 1949 Minimum concentrations of manganese necessary for injury to various legumes in culture solutions. Agron. J. 41, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortley D G 1993 Manganese toxicity and tolerance in sweetpotato. HortScience 28, 812–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohki K 1984 Manganese deficiency and toxicity effects on growth, development, and nutrient composition in wheat. Agron. J. 76, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter D J, Robinson J B and Dutkiewicz C 1997 Plant Analysis: an interpretation manual, (2nd ed). CSIRO Publishing. Collingwood, Australia. 572 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippel A 1923 About iron-induced chlorosis caused by manganese in green plants (in German). Biochem. Ztschr. 140, 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1997 SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.12.SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott B J, Fisher J A and Spohr L J 1992 Tolerance of Australian wheat varieties to aluminium toxicity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siman A, Cradock F W and Hudson A W1974 The development of manganese toxicity in pasture legumes under extreme climatic conditions. Plant Soil 41, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow L A and Uren N C 1987 The role of manganese toxicity in crop yellowing on seasonally waterlogged and strongly acidic soils in north-eastern Victoria. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wratten N and Scott B J 1979 Manganese tolerance in rape. Field Crops Newslett. 14, 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Moroni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moroni, J.S., Scott, B.J. & Wratten, N. Differential tolerance of high manganese among rapeseed genotypes. Plant and Soil 253, 507–519 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899215845

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899215845

Navigation