Skip to main content

The Structure and Dynamics of Group Politics: 1964–1992

Political Behavior volume 19, pages 247–282 (1997)Cite this article

Abstract

In the realm of politics the relevance of groups derives from their centrality to government institutions, the policy process, and election campaigns. In addition, individuals have a predisposition to rely on cues and shortcuts when making choices and forming preferences; groups are ideal for this purpose. Groups help orient individuals to their social world by providing standards, supplying information, and defining friend and foe. If groups are central to politics and political cognition then we should find an underlying political structure within which group attitudes can be organized, and through which other political attitudes, coalitions, and behaviors can be viewed. In our analysis we apply Rabinowitz (1976) Line of Sight method for ordering object pairs consistent with the Euclidean spatial model to the complete series of group thermometer ratings from the NES Presidential Election Studies, 1964 through 1992. The resulting eight group by group matrices are subjected to a series of multidimensional scaling models to determine the underlying structure of the group spatial distances. Our findings suggest that orientations toward groups can be satisfactorily mapped into a two-dimensional space defined by partisan and affective axes. Over this 30-year period we find that attitudes toward groups have become more emotional and less partisan in nature. Interpretation of the group space is further aided by the use of ideal-point regressions that make it possible to place voters, members of the New Deal coalition, and issue publics in the space defined by group attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

REFERENCES

  • Abramson, Paul, Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David (1994). Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1972). Where the votes come from: An analysis of electoral coalitions. American Political Science Review 66: 11-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1974). Communication. American Political Science Review 68: 717-720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1978). Communication. American Political Science Review 72: 622-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1982). Communication. American Political Science Review 76: 394-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1986). Communication. American Political Science Review 80: 281-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Earl, and Black, Merle (1987). Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Earl, and Black, Merle (1992). The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review 79: 1061-1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Dennis (1993). How people think, reason and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science 37: 867-899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. Journal of Politics 46: 760-785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. (1985). The impact of group economic interests on political evaluations. American Politics Quarterly 13: 139-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. (1988a). The role of social groups in political thinking. British Journal of Political Science 18: 51-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. (1988b). Feminists and the gender gap. Journal of Politics 50: 985-1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley (1981). The origins and meaning of Liberal/Conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science 25: 617-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley (1984). Group identification, values, and the nature of political beliefs. American Politics Quarterly 12: 151-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J., and Sapiro, Virginia (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science 37: 1079-1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth A. (1989). Measuring feminist consciousness. Women & Politics 9: 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth A. (1993). Feminist connsciousness and candidate preference among American women, 1972–88. Political Behavior 15: 227-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth A., and Wilcox, Clyde (1991). Feminism and the gender gap—A second look. Journal of Politics 53: 1111-1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1987). Groups and political behavior: Legitimation, deprivation, and competing values. Political Behavior 9: 323-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, Douglas V. (1987). Political science: Using the generalized Euclidean model to study ideological shifts in the U.S. Senate. In Forrest W. Young and Robert M. Hamer (eds.), Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, Thomas B., and Edsall, Mary D. (1991). Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights and Taxes on American Politics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1954). Studies in reference group behavior. Human Relations 7: 191-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert, Lancaster, Thomas, and Romero, David (1989). Group components of the presidential vote, 1952–1984. Journal of Politics 51: 337-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7: 117-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. (1991). Social Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, Ruth, Lodge, Milton, and Blake, Frederick (1985). The breadth, depth and utility of class, partisan and ideological schemata. American Journal of Political Science 29: 850-870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, William G. (1993). A SAS macro for calculating the line-of-sight measure of interobject dissimilarity. Psychometrika 58: 511-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelen, Ted G. (1991). Politicized group identification: The case of fundamentalism. Western Political Quarterly 44: 209-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelen, Ted G. (1993). The political consequences of religious group attitudes. Journal of Politics 55: 178-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagay, Michael R., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1980). A reformed electorate? Well, at least a changed electorate, 1952–1976. In William J. Crotty (ed.), Paths to Political Reform. Lexington, KY: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keicolt, K. Jill (1987). Group consciousness and the attribution of blame for national problems. American Politics Quarterly 15: 203-222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R., Adams, Gordon S., and Gronke, Paul W. (1989). Economics and politics in the 1984 American presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 33: 491-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David (1976). Change and Continuity in American Politics: The Social Bases of Political Parties. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Jeffrey W. (1991). Explanations of group economic outcomes: Determinants and consequences. American Politics Quarterly 19: 211-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Jeffrey W. (1993). Is group membership a prerequisite for group identification? Political Behavior 15: 49-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James H., Metlay, Daniel S., and Kay, W.D. (1982). Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy. American Journal of Political Science 26: 615-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James H., Riggle, Ellen, Ottati, Victor, Schwarz, Norbert, and Wyer, Robert S., Jr. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science 35: 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. (1986). Political schemata, candidate evaluations and voting behavior. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R., and Sears, David O. (1986). Social cognition and political cognition: The past, the present and the future. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel (1944). The People's Choice. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, Teresa E., and Miller, Warren E. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. American Political Science Review 73: 751-771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Milton, and Steenbergen, Marco R., with Brau, Shawn (1995). The responsive voter: campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 89: 309-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E., and Rahn, Wendy (1990). Emotions and democratic politics. In Samuel Long (ed.), Research in Micropolitics: Public Opinion, vol. 3, pp. 29-57. London: JAI Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Herbert, and Brill, Alida (1983). Dimensions of Tolerance. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Hildreth, Anne, and Simmons, Grace L. (1988). The mobilization of gender group consciousness. In Kathleen B. Jones and Anna G. Jonasdottir (eds.), The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., and Wlezien, Christopher (1993). The social group dynamics of partisan evaluations. Electoral Studies 12: 5-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Wlezien, Christopher, and Hildreth, Anne (1991). A reference group theory of partisan coalitions. Journal of Politics 53: 1134-1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Gurin, Patricia, Gurin, Gerald, and Malanchuk, Oksana (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science 25: 494-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E. (1988). Without Consent: Mass Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent (1986). Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Levitin, Teresa E. (1976). Leadership and Change. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Michael (ed.) (1993). The Elections of 1992. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, Theodore (1943). Personality and Social Change: Attitude Formation in a Student Community. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John (1979). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, Dan, and Savage, Robert L. (1976). Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard E., and Ross, Lee (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottati, Victor C., and Wyer, Robert S., Jr. (1990). The cognitive mediators of political choice: Toward a comprehensive model of political information processing. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John (1981). Party Coalitions, Realignment, and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John (1987). Realignment: New party coalitions and the nationalization of the South. Journal of Politics 49: 348-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John, and Steeper, Frederick (1987). The political landscape in 1988. Public Opinion, September/October: 41-44.

  • Pomper, Gerald M. (1975). Voter's Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald (1993). The Election of 1992: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, George (1975). An introduction to nonmetric multidimensional scaling. American Journal of Political Science 19: 343-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, George (1976). A procedure for ordering object pairs consistent with the multidimensional unfolding model. Psychometrika 41: 349-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, Richard M., and Wattenberg, Ben J. (1992). The Real Majority. New York: Donald I. Fine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P., and Speer, Leslie K. (1979). Whites' opposition to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics? American Political Science Review 73: 369-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., and McConahay, John S. (1973). The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riots. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., and Allen, Harris M., Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review 74: 670-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, Muzafer (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingles, Richard D. (1981). Black consciousness and political participation. American Political Science Review 75: 76-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E., and Brady, Henry E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics. British Journal of Political Science 16: 405-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Harold W., Bianco, William T., and Niemi, Richard G. (1986). Partisanship and Group Support Over Time: A Multivariate Analysis. American Political Science Review 80:969-976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Harold, and Niemi, Richard (1991). Partisanship and group support, 1952–1988. American Politics Quarterly 19: 189-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Harold, and Niemi, Richard (1995). The demise of the new deal coalition: Partisanship and group support, 1952–1992. In Herbert F. Weisberg (ed.), Democracy's Feast. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E. (1966). Some dynamic elements of contests for the presidency. American Political Science Review 60: 19-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Yoshio, Young, Forrest W., and deLeeuw, Jan (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika 42: 7-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolleson Rinehart, Sue (1992). Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, Richard J. (1976). Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, John C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Henri Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanneman, Reeve D., and Pettigrew, Thomas F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race 13: 461-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin (1987). The hollow realignment: Partisan change in a candidate centered era. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 58-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin (1990a). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1962–1988. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin (1990b). From a partisan to a candidate-centered electorate. In Anthony King (ed.), Party Coalitions in the 1980's. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin, and Miller, Arthur (1981). Decay in regional party coalitions, 1952–1980. In Seymour Martin Lipset (ed.), Party Coalitions in the 1980's. San Francisco: Institute for Comparative Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Herbert F., and Rusk, Jerold G. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 64: 1167-1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Herbert F., Haynes, Audrey A., and Krosnick, Jon A. (1995). Social-group polarization in 1992. In Herbert F. Weisberg (ed.), Democracy's Feast. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Michael R., and Leege, David C. (1991). Dual reference groups and political orientations: An examination of evangelically oriented Catholics. American Journal of Political Science 35: 28-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Forrest W., and Hamer, Robert M. (1987). Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, Robert B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35: 151-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, Robert B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39: 117-123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, State University of New York–Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260

    Frank P. Zinni

Authors
  1. Frank P. Zinni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurie A. Rhodebeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franco Mattei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinni, F.P., Rhodebeck, L.A. & Mattei, F. The Structure and Dynamics of Group Politics: 1964–1992. Political Behavior 19, 247–282 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024886815163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024886815163

Keywords

  • Policy Process
  • Presidential Election
  • Political Attitude
  • Group Matrice
  • Government Institution