Abstract
This paper examines the communication of political preferences between citizens during the course of an election campaign. We are particularly concerned with the ability of individuals to make judgments regarding the likely votes of others within their networks of relationships. To this end, we employ the concept of accessibility and its measurement device—response latency or response time—in the context of a computer-assisted telephone interview. We argue that the accessibility of respondent perceptions regarding the voting preferences of their associates depends on a range of individual and contextual factors, and the analysis focuses on variation across individuals, across relationships, and across the temporal contexts of election campaigns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abelson, Robert P. (1995). Attitude extremity. In Richard E. Petty and John A. Krosnick (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 25–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Achen, Christopher H. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review 69: 1218–1231.
Bargh, John A., Wendy J. Lombardi, and E. Tory Higgins (1988). Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in person X situation effects on person perception: It's just a matter of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 599–605.
Bargh, John A., Shelly Chaiken, Rajen Govender, and Felicia Pratto (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 893–912.
Bassili, John N. (1993). Response latency versus certainty as indexes of the strength of voting intentions in a CATI survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 54–61.
Bassili, John N. (1995a). Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (July): 686–695.
Bassili, John N. (1995b). On the psychological reality of party identification: Evidence from the accessibility of voting intentions and of partisan feelings. Political Behavior 17: 339–358.
Bassili, John N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 637–653.
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burt, Ronald S. (1986). A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data. Social Networks 8: 149–174.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
Fazio, Russell H. (1990a). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In Clyde Hendrick and Margaret S. Clark (eds.), Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 74–97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fazio, Russell H. (1990b). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 23 (pp. 75–110). New York: Academic Press.
Fazio, Russell H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fazio, Russell H. 1993. “Variability in the Likelihood of Automatic Attitude Activation: Data Reanalysis and Commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992),” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 753–758.
Fazio, Russell H. and Carol J. Williams. 1986. “Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of the Attitude-Perception and Attitude-Behavior Relations: An Investigation of the 1984 Presidential Election,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 505–514.
Fazio, Russell H., Jeaw-Mei Chen, Elizabeth C. McDonel, and Steven J. Sherman (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 18: 339–357.
Fazio, Russell H., M. C. Powell, and Carol J. Williams (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research 16: 280–288.
Granovetter, Mark (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.
Higgins, E. Tory, and John A. Bargh (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology 38: 369–425.
Higgins, E. Tory, and Gillian King (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In Nancy Cantor and John F. Kihlstrom (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul A. Beck, Russell J. Dalton, and Jeffrey Levine (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 1025–1054.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul A. Beck, Russell J. Dalton, Jeffrey Levine, and William Morgan, (forthcoming). Ambiguity, distorted messages, and nested environmental effects on political communication. Journal of Politics.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80: 237–251.
Latane, Bibb (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36 (April): 343–356.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet (1944). The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lodge, Milton, and Charles Taber (forthcoming). Three steps towards a theory of motivated political reasoning. In Anthony Lupia, Matthew McCubbin, and Samuel Popkin (eds.), Elements of Political Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Edward G. Carmines (1997). Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Telock (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.
Wyer, Robert S., Jr., and Thomas K. Srull (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. Tory Higgins, C. Peter Herman, and Mark P. Zanna (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 161–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John R., and Stanley Feldman (1992). A simple model of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36 (August): 579–616.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W. et al. Election Campaigns, Social Communication, and the Accessibility of Perceived Discussant Preference. Political Behavior 20, 263–294 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024866630373
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024866630373