Abstract
A number of attorneys, judges, and legal scholars have asserted that the overly combative nature of American trials may impact on the actual quality of justice and bring the legal system into disrepute. In contrast, many who witness criminal and civil trials conducted in Great Britain are struck by the greater apparent civility of the courtroom atmosphere. Closer examination of the English system reveals seven specific procedural differences that may contribute to this perceived change in atmosphere. In this study, these procedural differences were manipulated and their effect on verdict and on perceptions of trial participants measured. In addition, opinions about these differences were elicited. Results showed that while the trial was perceived as more civil, and the judge viewed more positively, participants tended to indicate preferences for the American style. Implications of these results are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Jury trials. London: Oxford Press.
Clarke, C. (1991). Missed manners in courtroom decorum. Maryland Law Review, 50, 945–1026.
Enoch, C. (January, 1994). Incivility in the legal system? Maybe it's the Rules. Southern Methodist Law Review, 45, 199–233.
Friesen, E. C., & Scott, I. R. English criminal justice. Birmingham: Institute of Judicial Adminstration.
Garwin, A. (June, 1995). Disorder in the court. American Bar Association Journal, 81, 101.
Herron, C. (1990). Collegiality, justice, and the public image: Why one lawyer's pleasure is another's poison. University of Miami Law Review, 44, 807–838.
Interim Report of the Committee on Civility of the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, 143 F.R.D. 371 (1992).
Kanner, G. (November, 1991). Welcome home Rambo: High-minded ethics and low-down tactics in the courts. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 25, 81–109.
Linz, D., Penrod, S., & McDonald, E. (1986). Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom: A view from off the bench. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 281–302.
Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1984). Increasing attorney persuasiveness in the courtroom. Law and Psychology Review, 14, 1–47.
Mashburn, A. (Winter, 1994). Professionalism as class ideology: Civility codes and bar hierarchy. Valparaiso University Law Review, 28, 657–708.
Turner, D., & Fulero, S. (1997). Can civility return to the courtroom? Will American jurors like it? Ohio State Law Journal, 58, 131–174.
Williams, G. (1957). The proof of guilt: A study of the English criminal trial (2nd ed.). London: Stevens and Sons.
Wolfe, J. (1994). The effect of location in the courtroom on jury perception of lawyer performance in the courtroom. Pepperdine Law Review, 21, 731–776.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Fulero, S.M., Turner, D. Using British Trial Procedures in American Cases: A More Civil Trial?. Law Hum Behav 21, 439–448 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024863320673
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024863320673