Abstract
Adults' accuracy on a sentence verification task was measured to assess reliable biases in their responses as a function of their level of knowledge about the target words, as well as adults' ability to reject incorrect ontological category membership for their partially known words. Three levels of word knowledge (known, frontier, and unknown) were assessed in two experiments. Results indicated that participants were conservative decision-makers about sentences using the vocabulary words and that the conservative bias increased in strength as their level of knowledge about the target word increased. When biased guessing was discouraged, results indicated that participants were able to accurately identify both correct and incorrect sentences using targets at all three levels of knowledge, including their partially known words, but were least reliable at rejecting false sentences using unknown targets. Implications for the role of “knowing not” in adults' vocabulary acquisition are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Clark, E. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
Curtis, M. E. (1987). Vocabulary testing and vocabulary instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 37-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dale, E. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary English, 42, 395-401.
Dolling, J. (1995). Ontological domains, semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 785-807.
Durso, F. T., & Shore, W. J. (1991). Partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 190-202.
Fischer, U. (1994). Learning words from contexts and dictionaries: An experimental comparison. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 551-574.
Grandy, R. E. (1987). In defense of semantic fields. In E. Lepore (Ed.), New directions in semantics (pp. 259-280). Orlando: Academic Press.
Grandy, R. E. (1992). Semantic fields, prototypes, and the lexicon. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 103-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kittay, E. F. (1992). Semantic fields and the individuation of content. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 229-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kolers, P. A., & Ostry, D. J. (1974). Time course of loss of information regarding pattern analyzing operations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 757-759.
Kolers, P. A., & Palef, S. R. (1976). Knowing not. Memory & Cognition, 4, 553-558.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
Loewenthal, K. (1971). A study of imperfectly acquired vocabulary. British Journal of Psychology, 62, 225-233.
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203-208.
McNicol, D. (1972). A primer of signal detection theory. London: Allen and Unwin.
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253.
O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 313-333.
O'Connor, J. (1940). Unsolved business problems. Boston, MA: Johnson O' Connor Research Foundation.
Sachs, H. J. (1943). The reading method of acquiring vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 36, 457-464.
Shore, W. J., & Durso, F. T. (1990). Partial knowledge in vocabulary acquisition: General constraints and specific detail. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 315-318.
Shore, W. J., & Kempe, V. (1999). The role of sentence context in accessing partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 145-163.
Sines, L. K. (1958). Intelligence tests correlates of Shipley-Hartford performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14, 399-404.
Smith, P. H., Whitmore, J., Shore, W. J., Robinson, C., & Dixon, W. E. Jr. (1999). Infants' responses to objects representing levels of word knowledge and categorical information. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 511-526.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. Mckeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trembly, D. (1966). Laws of learning general and specialized vocabularies. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Psychological Association (pp. 229-230). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Whitmore, J. M., & Shore, W. J. (November, 1997). The ontological nature of partial knowledge of word meanings. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lockett, J.N., Shore, W.J. A Narwhal Is an Animal: Partial Word Knowledge Biases Adults' Decisions. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 477–496 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024855830894
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024855830894