Skip to main content
Log in

Electoral Competitiveness and the Voting Decision Evidence from the Pooled Senate Election Study

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarship on congressional elections holds that competitive elections are different from noncompetitive elections. Specifically, some scholars argue that the level of competitiveness determines the criteria or the weight of various criteria for the voting decision. Using the 1988–1990–1992 Pooled Senate Election Study, this research finds that enhanced electoral competitiveness increases the importance of assessments of presidential performance on the voting decision. These effects are particularly large for voters with high levels of educational attainment. Contrary to previous research, in highly competitive elections the role of ideological considerations is smaller than in less competitive elections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal (1992). Senate Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina (1987). The Personal Vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, James E., and Joe A. Sumners (1990). Presidential coattails in Senate elections. American Political Science Review 84: 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 578–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard (1978). Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris (1974). Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Boston: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Charles H. (1991). Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate incumbents. American Political Science Review 85: 1193–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson, Paul S. (1995). Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary (1992). The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasno, Jonathan (1994). Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, Jon A., and Laura A. Brannon (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review 87: 963–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, Franco, and Herbert F. Weisberg (1994). Presidential succession effects in voting. British Journal of Political Science 24: 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. (1990). Public judgments of Senate and House candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15: 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1993a). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior 15: 167–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1993b). Presidential coattails and open seats: The district-level impact of heuristic processing. American Politics Quarterly 21: 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1993c). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science 37: 186–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J. (1994). Cognitive heuristics, heuristic processing, and efficiency in political decision making. In Michael X. Delli-Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Y. Shapiro (eds.), Research in Micropolitics (pp. 117–142). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Carl McCurley (1994). Cognitive efficiency and the congressional vote: The psychology of coattail voting. Political Research Quarterly 47: 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Thomas E., Zoe M. Oxley, and Rosalee A Clawson (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior 19: 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Barbara (1990). Washington behavior and home-state reputation: The impact of national prominence on senators' visibility and likability. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15: 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., James M. Glaser, and Robert Griffin (1990.) Information and electoral choice. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Process. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlye, Mark C. (1983). Competitiveness of Senate seats and voting behavior in Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science 22: 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlye, Mark C. (1991). Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition 8: 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, J.W. Electoral Competitiveness and the Voting Decision Evidence from the Pooled Senate Election Study. Political Behavior 20, 295–311 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024843714443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024843714443

Keywords

Navigation