Skip to main content
Log in

Interpersonal Environment Effects on Political Preferences: The “Middle Path” for Conceptualizing Social Structure in New Zealand and Japan

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of interpersonal environment, as measured by the degree of heterogeneity or homogeneity of political party preferences among important others in an individual's social network, was investigated using a national probability sample in Japan and regional sample in New Zealand. In both cultures, the interpersonal environment exerted significant and consistent effects on individual voting preferences. Those who reported inhabiting relatively homogeneous interpersonal political environments (IPEs) displayed a strong tendency to vote for the same political party as the important others in their social network. This effect was robust even after controlling for party identification, attitudes, media exposure, and objectively defined group memberships. Importantly, this tendency was not predicated on the frequency of talk about politics with significant others. Implications are discussed for both micro-level and macro-level theories of social structure and political behavior; an argument is made for the importance of a “middle path”—the psychology of enduring relationships between people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allport, F. (1920). The influence of the group on association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3: 159-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T., and H. Akiyama (1995). Convoys and social relations: Family and friendships within a life span context. In R. Blieszner and V.H. Bedford (eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Family (pp. 355-371). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In H. Guetzkow (ed.), Groups, Leadership and Men (pp. 177-190). Carnegie Press.

  • Bean, C. (1988). Class and party in the Anglo-American democracies: The case of New Zealand in perspective. British Journal of Political Science 18: 303-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, P. A. (1991). Voters' intermediation environments in the 1988 presidential contest. Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 371-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., and J. E. Schwartz (1984). Crosscutting Social Circles. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin 86: 307-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, P. (1976). Social networks and voting: Some Israeli data. Social Forces 54: 833-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion and structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287-1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and H. B. Gerard (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 629-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., and C. Husbands (1985). British Democracy at the Crossroads. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, K. A., and K. Deaux (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 243-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Rieken, and S. Schachter (1956). When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1989). Social networks and the structure experiment. In L. C. Freeman, D. R. White, and A. K. Romney (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis (pp. 11-40). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., and S. C. Haines, (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 295-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R. (1986). Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review 81(4): 1197-1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague (1991). Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. Journal of Politics 53: 122-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., P. A. Beck, R. J. Dalton, and J. Levine (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion, American Journal of Political Science 39: 1025-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, K. (1992). Analyses and comments on the changes in party support variables (in Japanese). In Parties and Cabinet in Japan 1981–1991. Tokyo: Jiji-Tsushin-Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, K. (1994). Political environment in Japanese social networks. Paper presented at the Tokyo Symposium on the Cross-National Election Project (CNEP), held in Tokyo.

  • Ikeda, K. (1996). Social psychological study on voting behavior: Impact of party schema and group environment. In Mind, Machine, and Environment: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century (pp. 293-315). Seoul: Hak Mun Publishing Co. (as a conference paper for the KPA 50th Anniversary Conferences held at Seoul, June 27–29, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, K. (1997). Political cognitive maps, homogeneous group environment, exemplars in mass media, and voting behavior in the 1993 general election in Japan—a study in political social reality. In Progress in Asian Social Psychology vol.1 (pp. 264-285). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Ikeda, K., K. Midooka, & K. Yamada (1993). Impacts of social networks on voting behavior. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Japanese Society for Social Psychology, Tokyo.

  • Kabashima, I., and Y. Takenaka (1996). Contemporary Ideology of Japanese (in Japanese). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., and P. F. Lazarsfeld (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Free Press.

  • Knoke, D. (1990a). Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (1990b). Social networks and voting behavior: Towards theory construction. Social Forces 68(4): 1041-1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamare, J. W. (1992). Party identification. In M. Holland (ed.), Electoral Behavior in New Zealand. Auckland, NZ: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36: 343-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., and T. L'Herrou (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1218-1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., and J. H. Liu (1996). The inter-subjective geometry of social space. Journal of Communications 46(4): 26-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., J. H. Liu, A. Nowak, M. Bonevento, and L. Zheng (1994). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8: 795-805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P., B. Berelson, and H. Gaudet (1948). The People's Choice, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. H., and M. Allen (under review). The evolution of political complexity in Maori Hawke's Bay: Archaeological history and its challenge to intergroup theory in psychology.

  • Liu, J. H., B. Bonzon-Liu, and M. Pierce-Guarino (1997). Common fate between humans and animals? The dynamical systems theory of groups and environmental attitudes in the Florida Keys. Environment and Behavior 29(1): 87-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., and S. Kitayama (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review 98: 224-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (1990). Social network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, I. (1989). Voting Behavior (in Japanese). Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, J. J. (1995). Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latané (1990). From private attitudes to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97: 362-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, G. A. (1986). On the perception of a group's variability. In S. Worchel and W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (pp. 25-48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., and D. L. Kincaid (1981). Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., and C. Funk (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 24. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suitor, J. J., B. Wellman, and D. L. Morgan (1996). It's about time: How, why, and when networks change. Social Networks (Special Issue: Change in Networks) 19: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Y. (in press). How does an advisor influence a student?: A case study. In E. Winograd, R. Fivush, and W. Hirst (eds.), Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honor of Ulric Neisser. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanuki, J., and I. Miyake (1997) Environmental Change and Attitude Change: Changing Japanese Electoral Behavior No. 2 (in Japanese). Tokyo: Bokutaku-sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1982). Studying personal communities. In P. V. Marsden amd N. Lin (eds.), Social Structures and Network Analysis (pp. 61-80). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, A. S., N. A. Valentino, and E. W. Zuckerman (1994). A structural theory of vote choice: Social and political networks and electoral flows in Britain and the United States. Journal of Politics 56: 1008-1033.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J.H., Ikeda, K. & Wilson, M.S. Interpersonal Environment Effects on Political Preferences: The “Middle Path” for Conceptualizing Social Structure in New Zealand and Japan. Political Behavior 20, 183–212 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024822606323

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024822606323

Keywords

Navigation