Abstract
In a series of three studies, characteristics of novel figurative phrases were compared with those of established idioms. Studies 1 and 2 found that certain correlations were found to be strong and in one direction for familiar idioms and comparably strong but in the opposite direction for novel figurative phrases, with the correlations for less familiar idioms usually falling partway between these extremes. Study 2 also noted that written or auditory presentation had minimal effects on characteristic ratings. In Study 3 the correlations among characteristics stayed relatively constant for familiar idioms after one, three, or six presentations, but for the novel figurative phrases, after multiple presentations the correlations changed in the direction of the established idioms.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bobrow, S. A., and Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343-346
Cacciari, C., and Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668-683.
Cronk, B. C., & Schweigert, W. A. (1992). The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 131-146.
Cicchetti, D. U. (1972). Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 405-408.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., 1980. Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8, 149-156.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., Bolton, J. L., & Keppel, M. E. (1989). Speaker's assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576-593.
Glucksberg, S., Brown, M., & McGlone, M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically assessed during idiom comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 21, 711-719.
McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167-190.
Mueller, & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1987). Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 63-81.
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 315-330.
Ortony, A, Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effect of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465-477.
Reagan, R. T. (1987). The syntax of english idioms: Can the dog be put on? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 417-441.
Schweigert, W. A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33-45.
Schweigert, W. A., & Cronk, B. C (1992–93). Ratings of the familiarity of idioms' figurative meanings and the likelihood of literal meanings among U.S. college students. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 11, 325-345.
Schweigert, W. A., & Moates, D. R. (1988). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 281-296.
Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1126-1138.
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655-1674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schweigert, W.A., Cintron, J., Sullivan, K. et al. Novel Figurative Phrases and Idioms: Phrase Characteristics over Multiple Presentations. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 455–475 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024803814056
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024803814056