Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Figurative Phrases and Idioms: Phrase Characteristics over Multiple Presentations

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a series of three studies, characteristics of novel figurative phrases were compared with those of established idioms. Studies 1 and 2 found that certain correlations were found to be strong and in one direction for familiar idioms and comparably strong but in the opposite direction for novel figurative phrases, with the correlations for less familiar idioms usually falling partway between these extremes. Study 2 also noted that written or auditory presentation had minimal effects on characteristic ratings. In Study 3 the correlations among characteristics stayed relatively constant for familiar idioms after one, three, or six presentations, but for the novel figurative phrases, after multiple presentations the correlations changed in the direction of the established idioms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bobrow, S. A., and Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343-346

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari, C., and Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668-683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, B. C., & Schweigert, W. A. (1992). The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness and usage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 131-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. U. (1972). Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 405-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., Jr., 1980. Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8, 149-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., Bolton, J. L., & Keppel, M. E. (1989). Speaker's assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms.

  • Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S., Brown, M., & McGlone, M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically assessed during idiom comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 21, 711-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1987). Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 315-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A, Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effect of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, R. T. (1987). The syntax of english idioms: Can the dog be put on? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 417-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W. A. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W. A., & Cronk, B. C (1992–93). Ratings of the familiarity of idioms' figurative meanings and the likelihood of literal meanings among U.S. college students. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 11, 325-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, W. A., & Moates, D. R. (1988). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 281-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: Effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1126-1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655-1674.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schweigert, W.A., Cintron, J., Sullivan, K. et al. Novel Figurative Phrases and Idioms: Phrase Characteristics over Multiple Presentations. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 455–475 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024803814056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024803814056

Navigation