Skip to main content
Log in

Time-Space Label Switching Protocol (TSL-SP)—A New Paradigm of Network Resource Assignment

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new protocol called time-space label switching protocol (TSL-SP) in optical burst switching (OBS), and define the terms time-space label (TSL) and time-space routing (TSR). An important concept of response time is introduced in the time label mechanism. The TSL-SP is a new technology that can quickly and efficiently forward data with a label on the optical networks. A two-dimension label switched path (TD-LSP) can be set up, that is maintained and deleted by the TSL-SP. For clearly illuminating the operation principles of the TSL-SP, we propose a new approach of orthogonal time-space coordinates in which the vertical coordinate is the space label and the horizontal coordinate is the time label. The proposed TD-LSP can dramatically reduce the routing failure probability and greatly improve the link network efficiency compared with other signaling protocols. Moreover, we define the time-space label control plane that can achieve the higher efficiency. When the TSL-SP is applied to networks, switching performance can be improved by two orders compared to the switching performance with the conventional OBS signaling protocols. The fundamental goal of TSL-SP is to band the signaling and routing functions together closely. Also, the TSL-SP can reduce the complexity of the network, support automatic service offering, and provide traffic engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. H. Liu, IP over WDM, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002), pp. 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Xu, H. G. Perros, G. Rouskas, Techniques for optical packet switching and optical burst switching, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39,no. 1, (Jan. 2001), pp. 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Verma, H. Chaskar, R. Ravikanth, Optical burst switching: A viable solution for terabit IP backbone, IEEE Network, vol. 14,no. 6, (November 2000), pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. White, M. Zukerman, A Framework for optical burst switching network design, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 6,no. 6, (June 2002), pp. 268–270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Mokhtar, M. Azizo glu, Adaptive wavelength routing in all-optical networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 6,no. 2, (Apr. 1998), pp. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Yang, S. Q. Zheng, D. Verchere, A QoS supporting scheduling algorithm for optical burst switching DWDM networks, Proc. of IEEE Globecom 2001, vol. 1, pp. 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ge, F. Callegati, L. S. Tamil, On optical burst switching and self-similar traffic, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4,no. 3, (Mar. 2000), pp. 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Y. Wei, R. I. McFarland, Just-in-time signaling for WDM optical burst switching networks, IEEE/OSA, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 18,no. 12, (Dec. 2000), pp. 2019–2037.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Yoo, C. Qiao, S. Dixit, Optical burst switching for service differentiation in the next-generation optical Internet, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39,no. 2, (Feb. 2001), pp. 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Baldine, G. N. Rouskas, H. G. Perros, D. Stevenson, JumpStart: A just-in-time signaling architecture for WDM burst-switched networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40,no. 2, (Feb. 2002), pp. 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Dolzer et.al., Evaluation of reservation mechanisms for optical burst switching, Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 55,no. 1, (2001), pp. 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Berger et al., Generalized MPLS—signaling functional description, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-09.txt, work in progress, IETF, http://www.ietf.org.

  13. GMPLS: A new way of optical networking, http://www.whiterocknetworks.com.

  14. J. Wang, L. Sahasrabuddhe, B. Mukherjee, Path vs. Subpath vs. Link restoration for fault management in IP-over-WDM networks: Performance comparisons using GMPLS control signaling, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40,no. 11, (Nov. 2002), pp. 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Shami, C. Assi, I. Habib, M. A. Ali, Performance evaluation of two GMPLS-based distributed control and management protocols for dynamic lightpath provisioning in future IP networks, IEEE ICC 2002, vol. 4, New York City, USA, (April 28–May 2, 2002) pp. 2289–2293.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Kuipers et al., An overview of constraint-based path selection algorithms for QoS routing, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40,no. 12, (Dec. 2002), pp. 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huang Anpeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anpeng, H., Linzhen, X., Zhengbin, L. et al. Time-Space Label Switching Protocol (TSL-SP)—A New Paradigm of Network Resource Assignment. Photonic Network Communications 6, 169–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024787231613

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024787231613

Navigation