Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 651–657 | Cite as

Special Contribution: An Overview of Recent Seismic Refraction Experiments in Central Europe

  • A. Guterch
  • M. Grad
  • A. Špičák
  • E. Brückl
  • E. Hegedüs
  • G.R. Keller
  • H. Thybo


Europe Refraction Structural Geology Special Contribution Seismic Refraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bogdanova S.V., Gorbatschev R., Stephenson R.A., and Guterch A. (eds), 2001. EUROBRIDGE: Palaeoproterozoic accretion of Fennoscandia and Sarmatia. Tectonophysics (Special Issue), 339, 1–2, 237 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Brückl E., Bodoky T., Hegedüs E., Hrubcová P., Gosar A., Grad M., Guterch A., Hajnal Z., Keller G.R., Špi?ák A., Sumanovac F., Thybo H., Weber F. and ALP 2002 Working Group, 2003. ALP 2002 Seismic Experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod., this issue.Google Scholar
  3. Czuba W., Grad M., Luosto U., Motuza G., Nasedkin V. and POLONAISE P5 Working Group, 2002. Upper crustal seismic structure of the Mazury complex and Mazowsze massif within the East European Craton in NE Poland. Tectonophysics, 360, 115–128.Google Scholar
  4. Decker K., Lillie B., and Tomek C. (eds), 1998. PANCARDI: The lithospheric structure and evolution of the Pannonian/Carpathian/Dinaride region. Tectonophysics (Special issue), 297, 1–4.Google Scholar
  5. Grad M., Keller G.R., Thybo H., Guterch A. and POLONAISE Working Group, 2002. Lower lithospheric structure beneath the Trans European Suture Zone from POLONAISE 97 seismic profiles. Tectonophysics, 360, 153–168.Google Scholar
  6. Grad M., Špi?ák A., Keller G.R., Guterch A., Bro M., Hegedüs E. and SUDETES 2003 Working Group, 2003. SUDETES 2003 Seismic Experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod., this issue.Google Scholar
  7. Guterch A., Grad M., Thybo H. and Keller G.R., 1999. POLONAISE '97-an international seismic experiment between Precambrian and Variscan Europe in Poland, Tectonophysics, 314 , 101–121.Google Scholar
  8. Guterch A., Grad M., Keller G.R., Posgay K., Vozár J., Špi?ák A., Brückl E., Hajnal Z., Thybo H., Selvi O. and CELEBRATION 2000 Experiment Team, 2003. CELEBRATION 2000 Seismic Experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod., this issue.Google Scholar
  9. Hauser F., Raileanu V., Fielitz W., Bala A. and Prodehl C., 2001. VRANCEA99-The crustal structure between the southeastern Carpathians and the Moesian Platform from a refraction seismic profile in Romania. Tectonophysics, 340, 233–256.Google Scholar
  10. Janik T., Yliniemi J., Grad M., Thybo H., Tiira T. and POLONAISE P2 Working Group, 2002. Crustal structure across the TESZ along POLONAISE.97 seismic profile P2 in NW Poland. Tectonophysics, 360, 129–152.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen S.L., Janik T., Thybo H., and POLONAISE Profile 1 Working Group, 1999. Seismic structure of the Paleozoic platform along POLONAISE '97 profile P1 in northwestern Poland. Tectonophysics, 314, 123–143.Google Scholar
  12. Keller G.R., and Hatcher, R.D. Jr., 1999. Some comparisons of the structure and evolution of the southern Appalachian-Ouachita orogen and portions of the Trans-European suture zone region. Tectonophysics, 314, 43–68.Google Scholar
  13. Linzer H.G., Frisch W., Zweigel P., Girbacea R., Hann H.P., and Moser, F., 1998. Kinematic evolution of the Romanian Carpathians. Tectonophysics, 297, 113–156.Google Scholar


  1. Pharaoh T.C., 1999. Palaeozoic terranes and their lithospheric boundaries within the Trans-European suture zone (TESZ): a review. Tectonophysics, 314 , 17–41.Google Scholar
  2. Plomerová J., Achauer U., Babu.ka V., Granet M. and BOHEMA Working Group, 2003. Passive seismic experiment to study lithosphere-asthenosphere system in the western part of the Bohemian Massif. Stud. Geophys. Geod., this issue.Google Scholar
  3. Poprawa P., Sliaupa S., Stephenson R., and Lazauskiene J., 1999. Late Vendian-Early Palaeozoic tectonic evolution of the Baltic basin: regional tectonic implications from subsidence analysis. Tectonophysics, 314, 218–239.Google Scholar
  4. Posgay K., Bodoky T., Hegedüs E., Kovácsvölgyi S., Lenkey L., Szafián P., Takács E., Tímár Z., and, Varga G., 1995. Asthenospheric structure beneath a Neogene basin in southeast Hungary. Tectonophysics, 252, 467–484.Google Scholar
  5. ?roda P. and POLONAISE Profile 3 Working Group, 1999. P-and S-wave velocity model of the southwestern edge of the Precambrian East European craton: POLONAISE ' 97, profile P3. Tectonophysics, 314, 175–192.Google Scholar
  6. ?roda P., Czuba W., Grad M., Guterch A., Gaczy?ski E. and POLONAISE Working Group, 2002. Three-dimensional seismic modelling of crustal structure in the TESZ region based on POLONAISE'97 data. Tectonophysics, 360, 169–185.Google Scholar
  7. Thybo H., Pharaoh T., and Guterch A. (eds), 1999. Geophysical investigations of the Trans-European suture zone. Tectonophysics (Special Issue), 314, 1–3, 350 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Thybo H., Pharaoh T., and Guterch A. (eds), 2002. Geophysical investigations of the Trans-European suture zone II. Tectonophysics (Special Issue), 339, 1–2, 237 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© StudiaGeo s.r.o. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Guterch
    • 1
  • M. Grad
    • 2
  • A. Špičák
    • 3
  • E. Brückl
    • 4
  • E. Hegedüs
    • 5
  • G.R. Keller
    • 6
  • H. Thybo
    • 7
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of GeophysicsUniversity of WarsawPoland
  3. 3.Geophysical InstituteAcad. Sci. Czech Rep.Prague 4Czech Republic
  4. 4.Technical UniversityViennaAustria
  5. 5.Eötvös Loránd Geophysical InstituteBudapestHungary
  6. 6.University of Texas at El PasoUSA
  7. 7.University of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations