Skip to main content
Log in

It's Boring: Notes on the Meanings of Boredom in Everyday Life

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Brissett, D., and Snow, R. P. (1993). Boredom: Where the future isn't. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 237-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1990). Organizational time: Temporal demands and the experience of work in restaurant kitchens. Social Forces, 69, 95-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglect concept. Human Relations, 46, 395-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, H. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, O. (1986). Overload and Boredom. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molstad, C. (1986). Choosing and coping with boring work. Urban Life, 15, 215-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E. (1975). Notes toward an archaeology of boredom. Social Research, 42, 493-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacks, P. M. (1995). Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, C. (1961). The Forest People. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conrad, P. It's Boring: Notes on the Meanings of Boredom in Everyday Life. Qualitative Sociology 20, 465–475 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024747820595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024747820595

Keywords

Navigation