Skip to main content
Log in

Client Assessment by Novice and Expert Psychologists: A Comparison of Strategies

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the amount and type of information expert and novice psychologists sought about a client to form their clinical impressions. Novices (N = 14) were graduate students in psychology who reported a mean of 1.8 years professional experience; experts (N = 14) were university counseling center psychologists with a mean of 13 years experience and who were peer-nominated as experts. All were presented with the same short description of a client and her presenting problem, then were to ask whatever questions they believed necessary to make an assessment and treatment plan. Experts and novices did not differ with respect to their confidence in their assessment. However, compared to novices, experts requested significantly more information (Ms of 23.1 vs. 14.9 questions) and focused less on crisis aspects of the client situation (56.5 vs. 64.4% of the questions).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alba, J. W., and Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychol. Bull. 93: 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. Am. Psychol. 48: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. C. (1993). Effects of Experience, Attitude, and Response Cost on Clinician Diagnostic Sensitivity, Response Bias, and Confidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.

  • Arbuckle, T. Y., Vanderleck, V. F., Harsany, M., and Lapidus, S. (1990). Adult age differences in memory in relation to the availability and accessibility of knowledge-based schemas. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 16: 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassock, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 16: 522–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D. (1986). Research on human judgment and its application to clinical practice. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 17: 420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., and Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science 241: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (1986). The appropriateness of confidence ratings in clinical judgment. J. Clin. Psychol. 42: 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (1989). Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychol. Bull. 105: 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. Am. Psychol. 45: 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, R. K. (1997). Psychological expertise and the role of individual differences: An exploration of issues. Educ. Psychol Rev. 9: 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, G. J., and Patel, U. L. (1988). The relationship between comprehension and reasoning in medical expertise. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J. (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. In Chipman, S., Segal, J., and Glaser, R. (eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, E. T. (1989). Cognitive differences between experts and novices: Implications for group supervision. J. Counsel. Devel.

  • Hillerbrand, E. T., and Claiborn, C. D. (1990). Examining reasoning skill differences between expert and novice counselors. J. Counsel. Devel. 68: 684–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, E. L., and Wooleat, P. L. (1980). Relationship of counselor conceptual level to clinical hypothesis formation. J. Counsel. Psycho. 27: 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., and Malle, B. F. (1993). Fuzzy concepts in psychotherapy research. Psychother. Res. 3: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., and Quigley, S. T. (1991). Dimensions used by experienced and novice group therapists to conceptualize group process. J. Counsel. Psychol. 38: 415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. M. (1984). Acquiring expertise. In Anderson, J. R., and Kosslyn, S. M. (eds.), Tutorials in Learning and Menory: Essays in Honor of Gordon Bower, W. H. Freman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P. S., and Nicoll, A. E. (1992). Capuring clinical expertise: An analysis of knowledge “mining” through expert system development. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 12: 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S. (1962). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, New York, pp, 287-293.

  • Patel, V. L., and Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge-based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognit. Sci. 10: 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. H., and Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogni. 16: 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart, D. E., and Norman, D. A. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In Anderson, J. R. (ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, P. M., and Strohmer, D. C. (1994). Clinical judgmental biases: The moderating roles of counselor cognitive complexity and counselor client preference. J. Counsel. Psychol. 41: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, T. J. (1991). Counseling research as an applied science. In Watkins, C. E., and Schneider, L. (eds.), Research in Counseling, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, M. (1993). Issues in Clinical Psychology: Subjective Versus Objective Approaches, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Byrne, K.R., Goodyear, R.K. Client Assessment by Novice and Expert Psychologists: A Comparison of Strategies. Educational Psychology Review 9, 267–278 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024739325390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024739325390

Navigation