Conservation Genetics

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 515–523 | Cite as

The risk of inbreeding due to habitat loss in the lion (Panthera leo)

  • Mats Björklund
Article

Abstract

A major concern in conservation biology is toavoid inbreeding depression in smallpopulations. Inbreeding has been shown to causeloss of fecundity and reduced survival innatural populations. To predict futureinbreeding levels, given changes in ecologicalconditions, data from large outbred populationsare needed. I use recent population geneticmodels to show how genetic data from such apopulation, combined with ecological data canbe used to predict future changes in levels ofinbreeding. In particular, data from the lion(Panthera leo) is used to simulate theeffect of habitat loss on the future levels ofinbreeding. To do this I used a deterministicpopulation genetics models and anindividual-based stochastic model. Two factorsstand out as particularly important: totalnumber of prides and male dispersal rates. Ifprides are very few (= 10) inbreeding (F)will increase from 0.0 in the initial state to0.26–0.45 after 30 generations, while if thenumber of prides is 100 this level is onlyaround 0.05 assuming no migration into thepopulation. Habitat heterogeneity had onlyminor effects. A reduction in male dispersalfrom their natal territory from 100% to 95%increased the level of inbreedingsubstantially, and never reached below F≈ 0.25 regardless of the number ofprides. Therefore, to sustain a large outbredpopulation of lions, a continuous population ofat least 50 prides, but preferably 100 prides,with no limits to dispersal is required.

deterministic model habitat loss inbreeding Panthera leo stochastic simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijlsma R, Bundgard J, Boerema AC (2000) Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations?: predictions from Drosophila. J. Evol. Biol., 13, 502-514.Google Scholar
  2. Brook BW, Tonkyn DW, O'Grady JJ, Frankham R (2002) Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risks in threatened species. Conserv. Ecol., 6, 16.Google Scholar
  3. Burgman MA, Lamont BB (1992) A stochastic model for the viability of Banksia vuneata populations: environmental, demographic and genetic effects. J. Appl. Ecol., 29, 719-727.Google Scholar
  4. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18, 237-268.Google Scholar
  5. Chesser RK, Rhodes Jr OE, Sugg DW, Schnabel A (1993) Effective sizes for subdivided populations. Genetics, 135, 1221-1232.Google Scholar
  6. Cnrokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83, 260-270.Google Scholar
  7. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. Harper &; Row, New York.Google Scholar
  8. DeRose MA, Roff DA (1999) A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution, 53, 1288-1292.Google Scholar
  9. Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol, 11, 326-330.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson AP, Mace GM, Poole J, Brett RA (1992) Conservation biology: the ecology and genetics of endangered species. In Genes in Ecology (eds. Berry RJ, Crawford TJ, Hewitt GM), pp. 405-430. Balckwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Frankham R (1995a) Conservation genetics. Ann. Rev. Genet., 29, 305-327.Google Scholar
  12. Frankham R (1995b) Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conserv. Biol., 9, 792-799.Google Scholar
  13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav., 28, 1140-1162.Google Scholar
  15. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst, 31, 139-162.Google Scholar
  17. Lacy RC, Alaks G, Walsh A (1996) Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution, 50, 2187-2200.Google Scholar
  18. Lacy RC, Ballou JD (1998) Effectiveness of selection in reducing the genetic load in populations of Peromyscus polionotus during generations of inbreeding. Evolution, 52, 900-909.Google Scholar
  19. Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science, 9, 782-791.Google Scholar
  20. Loeschske V, Tomiuk J, Jain S (1994) Conservation Genetics. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 584-599.Google Scholar
  22. Mills LS, Smouse PE (1994) Demographic consequences of inbreeding in remnant populations. Amer. Nat., 144, 412-431.Google Scholar
  23. Nieminen M, Singer MC, Fortelius W, Schöps K, Hanski I (2001) Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. Amer. Nat., 157, 237-244.Google Scholar
  24. Oostermeijer JGB (2000) Population viability analysis of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe: the importance of genetics, demographics and reproductive biology. In Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young AG, Clarke GM), pp. 313-334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Packer C, Herbst L, Pusey AE, Bygott JD, Hanby JP, Cairns SJ, Borgerhoff Mulder M (1988) Reproductive success of lions. In: Reproductive Success (ed. Clutton-Brock TH), pp. 363-383. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Packer, C, Gilbert DA, Pusey AE, O'Brien SJ (1991a) A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature, 351, 562-565.Google Scholar
  27. Packer C, Pusey AE, Rowley H, Gilbert DA, Martenson J, O'Brien SJ (1991b) Case-study of a population bottleneck–lions of the Ngorogoro crater. Cons. Biol., 5, 219-230.Google Scholar
  28. Pusey AE, Packer C (1987) The evolution of sex-biased dispersal in lions. Behaviour, 101, 275-310.Google Scholar
  29. Rousset F (2002) Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity, 88, 371-380.Google Scholar
  30. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392, 491-494.Google Scholar
  31. Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti Lion. University Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Soulé ME (1987) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Spong G, Creel C (2001) Deriving dispersal distances from genetic data. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B268, 2571-2574.Google Scholar
  34. Spong G, Creel S, Stone J, Björklund M (2002) Genetic structure of lions (Panthera leo L.) in the Selous Game Reserve: implications for the evolution of sociality. J. Evol. Biol., 15, 945-953.Google Scholar
  35. Stone J, Björklund M (2001) DELRIOUS: a computer program designed to analyse molecular marker data and calculate delta and relatedness estimates with confidence. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 1, 209-212.Google Scholar
  36. Wildt DE, Bush M, Goodrowe KL, Packer C, Pusey AE, Brown JL, Joslin P, O'Brien SJ (1987) Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations. Nature, 329, 328-331.Google Scholar
  37. Vucetich JA, Waite TA (1999) Erosion of Heterozygosity in Fluctuating Populations. Conserv. Biol., 13, 860-868.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mats Björklund
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology CentreUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden (E-mail

Personalised recommendations