Skip to main content
Log in

Development of protein microarray technology to monitor biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis disease

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most biological processes are mediated by complex networks of molecular interactions involving proteins. The analysis of protein expression in biological samples is especially important in the identification and monitoring of biomarkers for disease progression and therapeutic endpoints. In this paper, the development of a protein microarray format for multiplexed quantitative analysis of several potential markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is described. Development of a high-performance protein microarray system depends on several key parameters such as surface chemistry, capture agents, immobilization technology, and methods used for signal detection and quantification. Several technical possibilities were investigated and compared: poly-L-lysine versus self-assembled monolayer of octadecyl phosphoric acid ester for surface chemistries; noncontact piezoelectric versus contact printing technology for antibody deposition; CCD camera capture versus fluorescent scanning for image detection; and the concentration of coating antibody. On the basis of reproducibility, signal-to-noise ratio, and sensitivity we have selected self-assembled monolayer, noncontact piezoelectric printer, and high-read-out fluorescence scanning for our microarray format. This format was used to perform multiplexed quantitative analysis of several potential markers of disease progression of rheumatoid arthritis: IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and SAA. Some assays, such as MCP-1, provided a working range that covered physiologically relevant concentrations. Other assays, such as IL-6 and SAA, lacked sensitivity or were too sensitive for measuring biological concentrations, respectively. The results described demonstrate the applicability of protein microarrays to monitor RA markers; however, sandwich assay methodologies need to be further optimized to measure the appropriate biological ranges of these markers on one chip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvidson NG, Gudbjornsson B, Elfman L, Ryden AC, Totterman TH, Hallgren R. Circadian rhythm of serum interleukin-6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:521-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates DL. Enzyme amplified immunoassays. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1989;47:527-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowsher RR, Smith WC. Analytical validation of assays for novel biomarkers. AAPS Newsmagazine. 2002;6:18-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brovelli D, Hähner G, Ruiz L et al. Highly oriented, self-assembled alkanephosphate monolayers on tantalum (V) oxide surfaces. Langmuir. 1999;15:4324-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles P, Elliott MJ, Davis D et al. Regulation of cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, and acute-phase proteins following anti-TNF-alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 1999;163:1521-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy EH, Panayi GS. Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:907-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corthals GL, Wasinger VC, Hochstrasser DF, Sanchez JC. The dynamic range of protein expression: a challenge for proteomic research. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:1104-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunnane G, Grehan S, Geoghegan S et al. Serum amyloid A in the assessment of early inflammatory arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:58-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels MA, Hogquist KA, Jameson SC. Sweet ‘n’ sour: the impact of differential glycosylation on T cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:903-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Benedetti F, Pignatti P, Bernasconi S et al. Interleukin 8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Relation to onset types, disease activity, and synovial fluid leukocytes. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:425-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TJ, Han DK, Gygi SP et al. Toward a high-throughput approach to quantitative proteomic analysis: expression-dependent protein identification by mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2001;12:1238-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gygi SP, Rochon Y, Franza BR, Aebersold R. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1720-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haab BB. Advances in protein microarray technology for protein expression and interaction profiling. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev. 2001;4:116-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haab BB, Dunham MJ, Brown PO. Protein microarrays for highly parallel detection and quantitation of specific proteins and antibodies in complex solutions. Genome Biol. 2001;2:1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han KK, Martinage A. Post-translational chemical modifications of proteins-III. Current developments in analytical procedures of identification and quantitation of post-translational chemically modified amino acid(s) and its derivatives. Int J Biochem. 1993;25:957-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ideker T, Ozier O, Schwikowski B, Siegel AF. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(Supplement 1):S233-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodadek T. Protein microarrays: prospects and problems. Chem Biol. 2001;8:105-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409:860-921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian Z, Kluger Y, Greenbaum DS et al. Genomic and proteomic analysis of the myeloid differentiation program: global analysis of gene expression during induced differentiation in the MPRO cell line. Blood. 2002;100:3209-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky PE. Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Harrison TR, ed. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. Disorders of immune-mediated injury. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1998: 1880-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart DJ, Dong H, Byrne MC et al. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:1675-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath G, Schreiber SL. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science. 2000;289:1760-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuschäfer D, Budach W, Wanke C. Evanescent resonator chips: a universal platform with superior sensitivity for fluorescence-based microarrays. Biosensors Bioelectronics. 2003;18:489-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schena M. Microfluidic technologies and instrumentation for printing DNA microarrays. In: Schena M, ed. Microarray biochip technology. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 2000:19-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwikowski B, Uetz P, Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:1257-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko A, Loboda A, Shevchenko A, Ens W, Standing KG. MALDI quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for proteomic research. Anal Chem. 2000;72:2132-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll D, Templin MF, Schrenk M, Traub PC, Vohringer CF, Joos TO. Protein microarray technology. Front Biosci. 2002;7:c13-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291:1304-51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urbanowska, T., Mangialaio, S., Hartmann, C. et al. Development of protein microarray technology to monitor biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis disease. Cell Biol Toxicol 19, 189–202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024729526867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024729526867

Navigation