Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Performance Evaluation of a Separated Control Signaling Protocol for WDM Optical Networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In WDM optical networks, an efficient control signaling protocol is required to dynamically establish lightpaths. This paper proposes a separated control signaling protocol (SCSP) and compares the performance of SCSP with a conventional integrated control signaling protocol (ICSP). The conventional ICSP makes reservations sequentially from the source to the destination for setting up and tearing down lightpaths. It increases the control overhead and wastes the network resource if it cannot reserve the network resource at an intermediate node. Specifically, if the receiver at the destination is not available after successful reservation at intermediate nodes, it wastes a lot of bandwidth. It causes decreasing chances of reservation for other lightpaths. Instead, SCSP separates bearer control from call control to reduce the waste of network resources. The call control function checks the availability of network resources such as wavelengths and receivers. Bearer control reserves, allocates, and releases network resources. To evaluate the performance of the two protocols, they are mathematically analyzed using a probabilistic model. Simulation results are also provided to compare the proposed protocol with the conventional ICSP in terms of utilization and blocking probability. From the results of simulation and iterative analysis, we can observe that SCSP performs better than ICSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Chlamtac, A. Ganz, G. Karmi, Lightpath communication: An Approach to High Bandwidth Optical WANs, IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. 40,no. 7, (July 1992), pp. 1171–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Ramaswami, A. Segall, Distributed Network Control for Optical Networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 5,no. 6, (Dec. 1997), pp. 936–943.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Yuan, R. Melhem, R. Gupta, Distributed Path Reservation Algorithms for Multiplexed All Optical Interconnection Networks, IEEE Transaction on Computer, vol. 48,no. 12, (Dec. 1999), pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Mei and C. Qiao, Efficient Distributed Control Protocols for WDM All-Optical Networks, in: Proc. Int'l Conf. on Computer Comm and Networks (IC3N), Las Vegas, NV, USA (Sept. 1997), pp. 150–153.

  5. H. Zang, L. Sahasrabuddhe, J. P. Jue, S. Ramamurthy, B. Mukherjee, Connection Management for Wavelength-Routed WDM Networks, GLOBECOM '99, Janeiro, Brazil (Dec. 1999), pp. 1428–1432.

  6. S. Subramanium, M. Azizoglu, A. Somani, All-Optical networks with Sparse Wavelength Conversion, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, NJ, USA, vol. 4,no. 4, (Aug. 1996), pp. 544–557.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bersekas, R. Gallager, Data networks, (Prentice Hall, NJ, USA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. S. C. Correia, M. C. R. Medeiros, Optimization of WDM Multihop Logical Topologies, Proc. of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, Sevilla, Spain (Sept. 1998), pp. 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Alan, B. Pritsker, Introduction to Simulation and SLAM II, (System, 1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Sik Roh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roh, SS., Kim, SH., Kang, IK. et al. Design and Performance Evaluation of a Separated Control Signaling Protocol for WDM Optical Networks. Photonic Network Communications 6, 105–117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024727012958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024727012958

Navigation