Skip to main content
Log in

Phenolic acids: Possible agents of modifying N2-fixing symbiosis through rhizobial alteration?

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phenolic acids, low molecular weight phenolics, are precursors of a variety of antimicrobial compounds, root signalling molecules, and phytoalexins that play an important role in plant defence responses. In agro ecosystem, a large amount of litter is turned over during the cropping season, fallow period and land preparation. This releases a flush of phenolic acids, amounts of which exceed very much the quantities released in root exudation. In rhizobial inoculation of legumes, these phenolic acids, depending on the concentration, may affect the persistence of rhizobia in the soil and their symbiotic efficiency, in terms of N2 fixation. The present study evaluates the effects of different concentrations of four phenolic acids (protocatechuic, p-coumaric, ferulic and vanillic) on population size of four rhizobial strains (Bradyrhizobium elkanii SEMIA 5019, B. japonicum TAL 102 and TAL 620, and Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS 571). Culture media with different concentrations of phenolic acids in the presence or absence of manitol were used to evaluate rhizobial population size on day 6. Rhizobial total proteins were extracted and electrophoresed on polyacrylamide gels. Further, the effects of phenolic acid-affected rhizobia on N2 fixing capacity were also investigated by inoculating two of those strains to soybean. Phenolic acid-treated B. elkanii SEMIA 5019 and B. japonicum TAL 102 were inoculated to soybean, and plant growth, N accumulation and nodule dry weight were assessed in a pot experiment. The population size of TAL 102 was induced when the culture medium was supplied with different phenolic acids as the sole carbon source. In many cases, the presence of manitol in the medium masked the differential effects of phenolic acids on the rhizobial population size. All four phenolic acids used in our study suppressed the population size of TAL 620. Strain ORS 571 showed low population size at low concentrations followed by a growth recovery at high phenolic acid concentrations. Strain SEMIA 5019 treated with 0.03 mM ferulic acid produced the highest increase in shoot growth of soybean, (ca. 65%). Treating strain SEMIA 5019 with 9 mM protocatechuic acid produced the largest decrease in nodule dry weight (ca. 50%) without any significant changes in shoot N accumulation. P-coumaric acid, even at 0.12 mM, could stimulate the N2 fixing activity of SEMIA 5019, whereas the same concentration reduced the effectiveness of TAL102 in a soybean-rhizobium symbiosis. Phenolic acid interactions with rhizobia led to biochemical, and hence physiological changes, resulting in an alteration in their symbiotic ability. Different leguminous plants secrete different phenolic compounds other than phenolic acids during root exudation. Further studies should therefore be conducted to evaluate the effects of those compounds on the symbiosis. It is concluded from this study that the effect of phenolic acids is concentration and structure dependant, and strain-specific. The effect will also be pH dependant. Thus, phenolic acids are possible agents for modifying the legume-rhizobial symbiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bekkara F, Jay M, Viricel M R and Rome S 1998 Distribution of phenolic compounds within seed and seedlings of two Vicia faba cvs differing in their seed tannin content, and study of their seed and root phenolic exudations. Plant Soil 203, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum U and Shafer S R 1998 Soil-borne bacteria and phenolic bioassays. In Proc. 15th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Chemical Ecology. Ithaca, Cornal University, NY, USA. pp. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum U, Stamen K L, Flint L J and Shafer S R 2000 Induction and/or selection of phenolic acid-utilizing bulk-soil and rhizosphere bacteria and their influence on phenolic acid phytotoxicity. J. Chem. Ecol. 26, 2059–2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha W C and Jooste P J 1992 Evaluation of normalization and compensation procedures used in the analysis of electrophoretic protein profiles for bacterial taxonomy. S. Afr. J. Sci. 88, 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner J M and Tabatabai M A 1972 Use of an ammonia electrode for determination of ammonium in Kjeldhal analysis of soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 3, 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy-Lameta A and Jay M 1987 Study of soybean and lentil root exudates. III. Influence of soybean isoflavonoids on the growth of rhizobia and some rhizospheric microorganisms. Plant Soil 101, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • De vries R P, Michelson B, Poulsen C H, Kroon P A, van Den Heuvel R H H, Faulds C B, Williamson G, Van Den Hombergh J P T W and Visser J 1997 The fae A genes from Aspergillus niger and A. tubingensis encode ferulic acid esterases involved in degradation of complex cell wall polysaccharides. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 63, 4638–4644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewettink D, Pot B and Kersters K 1992 SDS–PAGE procedure for internal use. Laboratorium voor microbiologie. Ghent University, RUG, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon R A and Paiva N L 1995 Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7, 1085–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djordjevic M A, Redmond J W, Batley M and Rolfe B G 1987 Clovers secrete specific phenolic compounds which either stimulate or repress nod gene expression in Rhizobium trifolii. EMBO J. 6, 1173–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus B, Garcia J L and Gillis M 1988 Characterization of Azorhizobium caulinodans gen. nov., sp. nov., a stem-nodulating nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from Sesbania rostrata. Int. J. Sys. Bacteriol. 38, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaig W 1971 Organic compounds in soil. Soil Sci. 111, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J E, Starcevic M, Kow K Y, Burow M E and McLachlan J A 2001 Endocrine disrupters and flavonoid signaling. Nature 413, 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gel compare 1993 Comparative Analysis of Electrophoresis Patterns. Version 2.2 for windows. Applied maths. Kortrijk. Belgium. 61 pp.

  • Giller K E and Cadisch G 1995 Future benefits from biological nitrogen fixation: An ecological approach to agriculture. Plant Soil 174, 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard V J, Bailey M J, Darrah P and Lilley A K 2001 Monitoring temporal and spatial variation in rhizozphere bacterial population diversity: A community approach for the improved selection of rhizosphere competent bacteria. Plant Soil 232, 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenzi W D and McCalla T M 1966 Phytotoxic substances extracted from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30, 214–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbone J B 1997 Role of phenolic secondary metabolites in plants and their degradation in nature. In Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Eds. G Cadisch and K E Giller. pp. 67–73. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irisarri P, Milnitsky, Monza J and Bedmar E J 1996 Characterization of rhizobia nodulating Lotus subbliforus from Uruguayan soil. Plant Soil 180, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiraly Z, Klement Z, Solymosy F and Voros J 1974 Methods in Plant Pathology, with Special Reference to Breeding for Disease Resistance. Akademiae Kaido, Budapest. 509 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty G W and Bremner J M 1986 Effects of phenolic compounds on nitrification in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 920–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight T 1949 Efficiency of isolates of Rhizobium in the cowpea group, with proposed additions to this group. Queensl. J. Agric. Sci. 6, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikova T L 1994 Influence of natural phenols on Trifolium pratense-Rhizobium trifoli symbiosis. Acta Hort. 381, 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purushothaman D and Balaraman K 1973 Effect of soil phenolics on the growth of Rhizobium. Curr. Sci. 42, 507–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice E L and Pancholy S K 1973 Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. II: Additional evidence and possible role of tannins. Am. J. Bot. 80, 691–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch E F and Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1987 SAS-STAT Guide for Personnel Computers, Version 6: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sene M, Dore B and Pellissier F 2000 Effect of phenolic acids in soil under and between rows of a prior sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) crops on germination, emergence and seedling growth of peanut (Arachis hypogea). J. Chem. Ecol. 26, 625–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath P H A and Sokal R R 1973 Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practices of numerical classification. W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somasegaran P and Hoben H J 1994 Handbook for rhizobia: Methods in Legume-Rhizobium technology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York. 399 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staman K, Blum U, Louws F and Robertson D 2001 Can simultaneous inhibition of seedling growth and stimulation of rhizosphere bacterial populations provide evidence for phytotoxin transfer from plant residues in the bulk soil to the rhizosphere of sensitive species? J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 807–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowers M D 1985 Carbon metabolism in Rhizobium spp. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rossum D, Schuuramns F B, Gillis M, Muyotcha A, van Versveld H W, Stouthamer A H and Boogerd F C 1995 Genetic and phenetic analyses of Bradyrhizobium strains nodulating peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1599–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead D C 1964 Identification of p-hydroxybenzoic, vanilic, p-coumaric and ferulic acids in soils. Nature 202, 417–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Pratley J, Lemerle D, Haig T and Verbeek B 1998 Differential allelopathic potential among wheat accessions to annual ryegrass. Proc. of the Australian Agronomy Conference. Electronic publication (http://life.csu.edu.au/agronomy/papers/139/139.html).

  • Zawoznik M S, Garrido L M, del Pero Martinez M A and Tomaro M L 2000 Effect of vanillin on growth and symbiotic ability of Bradyrhizobium sp. (Arachis) strain. In Proc. Int. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Electronic publication (http:/www.ag.auburn.edu/argentina).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamini Seneviratne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seneviratne, G., Jayasinghearachchi, H. Phenolic acids: Possible agents of modifying N2-fixing symbiosis through rhizobial alteration?. Plant and Soil 252, 385–395 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024725511783

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024725511783

Navigation