Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 219–242 | Cite as

Dating Issues for Women with Physical Disabilities

  • Diana H. Rintala
  • Carol A. Howland
  • Margaret A. Nosek
  • Jama L. Bennett
  • Mary Ellen Young
  • Catherine C. Foley
  • C. Donald Rossi
  • Gail Chanpong
Article

Abstract

A study of dating issues for 250 single women with physical disabilities and 180 single women without disabilities was undertaken to determine (a) differences between women with and without disabilities and (b) predictors of dating outcomes for women with disabilities. A survey was sent to a national sample of women with disabilities along with a similar survey to give to a female friend without a disability. Dating outcomes included (a) satisfaction with dating frequency, (b) perceived constraints on attracting partners, (c) perceived personal barriers to dating, (d) perceived societal barriers to dating, and (e) perceived communication problems. Women with disabilities were disadvantaged on all but (e). Between 21% and 47% of the variance in the outcomes was accounted for in multiple regression analyses. Potential interventions suggested by the findings are discussed.

female disability dating relationships barriers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Glass DD, Padrone FJ: Sexual adjustment in the handicapped. J Rehabil 44(1):43–47, 1978Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Due T: Disabled face special challenges in dating. Houston Chronicle, May 24, 1995, p. 5DGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzales MH, Meyers SA: “Your mother would like me”: Self-presentation in the personals ads of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 19(2):131–142, 1993Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowe F: Disabled women in America. Washington, DC, President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped, 1984Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franklin P: Impact of disability on family structure. Soc Sec Bull 40:3–18, 1977Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanna WJ, Rogovsky B: Women and disability: Stigma and “the third factor.” Unpublished manuscript, 1986. Available from Department of Family and Community Development, College of Human Ecology, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sandowski CL: Sexual concerns when illness or disability strikes. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1989, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McAnarney ER: Social maturation: A challenge for handicapped and chronically ill adolescents. J Adolesc Health Care 6:90–101, 1985Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prisbell M: Perceptions of satisfaction with communication and self-rated competence in dating relationships. Percept Mot Skills 79:529–530, 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blum RW: The adolescent with spina bifida. Clin Pediatr 22:331–335, 1983Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sprecher S, Felmlee D: The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. J Marriage Fam: 888–900, Nov 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nosek MA, Howland CA, Young ME, Georgiou D, Rintala DH, Foley CC, Bennett JL, Smith Q: Wellness models and sexuality among women with physical disabilities. J Appl Rehabil Couns 25:50–58, 1994Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ray C, West J: I. Social, sexual and personal implications of paraplegia. Paraplegia 22:75–86, 1984Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips MJ: Damaged goods: Oral narrative of the experience of disability in American culture. Soc Sci Med 30(8):849–857, 1990Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sprecher S, McKinney K., Orbuch TL: The effect of current sexual behavior on friendship, dating and marriage desirability. J Sex Res 28(3):387–408, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams JD, Jacoby AP: The effects of premarital heterosexual and homosexual experience on dating and marriage desirability. J Marriage Fam: 489–497, May 1989Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Willmuth ME: Sexuality after spinal cord injury: A critical review. Clin Psychol Rev 7:389–412, 1987Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blum RW, Resnick MD, Nelson R, St. Germain A: Family and peer issues among adolescents with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. Pediatr 20:280–285, 1991Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castree BJ, Walker JH: The young adult with spina bifida. Br Med J 283:1040–1042, 1981Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cromer BA, Enrile B, McCoy K, Gerhardstein MJ, Fitzpatrick M, Judis J: Knowledge, attitudes and behavior related to sexuality in adolescents with chronic disability. Dev Med Child Neurol 32:602–610, 1990Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hayden RW, Davenport SLH, Campbell MM: Adolescents with myelodysplasia: Impact of physical disability on emotional maturation. Pediatr 64:53–59, 1979Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McAndrew I: Adolescents and young people with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 21:619–629, 1979Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nosek MA, Rintala DH, Young ME, Howland CA, Foley CC, Rossi D, Chanpong G: Sexual functioning among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77(2):107–115, 1996Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Young ME: Body image, sense of self, and sexuality of women with physical disabilities. Manuscript in preparation, 1996Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howland CA., Rintala DH, Nosek M A, Young ME, Foley CC, Bennett JL: Dating behaviors of women with physical disabilities. Soc Sci Med. Accepted with revisions, 1996Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nosek MA: Sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities. In Physical medicine and rehabilitation: State of the art reviews, Vol. 9No. 2, TN Monga (ed), 1995, pp 487–502Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nosek MA, Young ME, Rintala DH, Howland CA, Foley CC, Bennett JL: Barriers to reproductive health maintenance among women with physical disabilities. J Women's Health. In pressGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenberg M: Appendix D: Scales and scores. In Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1965, pp. 305–319Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M: The medical outcomes study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262(7):925–930, 1989Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana H. Rintala
    • 1
  • Carol A. Howland
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Nosek
    • 1
  • Jama L. Bennett
    • 1
  • Mary Ellen Young
    • 1
  • Catherine C. Foley
    • 1
  • C. Donald Rossi
    • 1
  • Gail Chanpong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationBaylor College of MedicineHouston

Personalised recommendations