Skip to main content
Log in

Car ownership and attitudes towards transport modes for shopping purposes in Singapore

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The heightening of issues, such as sustainable development and environmental pollution have resulted in many governments pursuing transport policies which aim to promote the use of public transport modes, including walking, as well as discourage the use of the car for various activities, such as shopping, work, recreation, etc. However, little has been done on understanding shoppers' perceptions of transport modes for shopping purposes. Particularly, not much research has been done on examining the attitudes of car owners and non-car owners towards transport modes for shopping purposes. Using Singapore as a study area, this study has attempted to analyse car owners and non-car owners' perceptions of the different types of transport modes (i.e., car, taxi, bus, mass rapid transit and walk) in their shopping trips. The research found that each transport mode has its own unique set of attributes. In addition, car owners and non-car owners portray different attitudes towards the public transport modes and the car. This calls for different strategies for these two groups of shoppers in encouraging them to use the public transport modes and restrain the use of the car.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assael H (1990) Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Action. New York: Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G (1995) Transport emissions and travel behaviour: a critical review of recent European Union and UK policy initiatives. Transportation 22: 295–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SJ (1999) Image and consumer attraction to intraurban retail areas: an environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 6: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat CR (1998) Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research – B: 361–371.

  • Black J (1996) Higher density housing and transport in Australian cities. In Hayashi Y & Roy J (eds.), Transport, Land-Use and the Environment. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button K, Peter N and Erik U (1996) Environmental aspects of transport: a prefatory overview. Transportation Planning and Technology 19: 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1996) Mixed land-use and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research-A: 361–377.

  • Cheung F & Hoen A (1996) Relationships between transport and land use in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of PTRC 24th European Transport Forum: Transport Policy and Its Implementation. Brunel University. 2–6 September 1996: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden W (1980) A patronage model of consumer behaviour. In: Stampfl R & Hirschman (eds) Competitive Structure in Retail Markets: The Department Store Perspectives. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment/Department of Transport (1993) Reducing Transport Emissions through Planning. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998) A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, White Paper on Transport. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2001) Transport Statistics, Great Britain, 2001 Edition. www.transtat.dtlr.gov.uk/personal/index.htm. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson R Frederick D & Caroline JS (1978) Structural models for the analysis of traveller attitude-behaviour relationship. Transportation 7: 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel JF Blackwell RD & Miniard PW (1990) Consumer Behaviour. London: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy F and Smith I (1998) Public transport demand in Freiburg: why did patronage double in decade? Transport Policy 5: 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner V (1991) Pollution of air, land, rivers and coast. In: Johnson RJ & Gardiner V (eds) The Changing Geography of the United Kingdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert G & Foerster J (1977) The importance of attitudes in the decision to use mass transit. Transportation 6: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob TF (1980) Transit Riders' Attitudes to Bus and Train. unpublished research documents.

  • Gurney A Jenkins A & Smyth A (1998) PPG 13: a vehicle for promoting the new agenda for sustainable transport and land use policy. In: Proceedings of PTRC 26th European Transport Conference: Policy, Planning and Sustainability. Loughborough University 14–18 September 1998: England.

  • Harrison S, Henderson G, Humphreys E & Smyth A (1998) Quality bus corridors and green routes: can they achieve a public perception of “permanence” of bus services?. In: Proceedings of PTRC 26th European Transport Conference: Public Transport Planning and Operations. Loughborough University 14–18 September 1998: England.

  • Hampshire County Council (1993) HeadStart. UK.

  • Hertfordshire County Council (1993) TravelWise Campaign. UK.

  • Jones P M (1978) Destination and travel attributes. In: Hensher DA & Dalvi Q (eds) Determinants of Travel Choice. Hants: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen K (1995) Grocery distribution, land use and sustainable transport. In: Proceedings of PTRC 23rd European Transport Forum: Transport Policy and Its Implementation. University of Warwick. 11–15 September 1995: England.

  • Kroes E (1986) The use of attitude models and stated preference models in practical transport analysis. In: Behavioural Research for Transport Policy. Utrecht: VNU Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Transport Authority (LTA) (1996) A World Class Land Transport System. White Paper presented to Parliament: 2 January 1996.

  • Mackett RL (1994) Transport and urban development: policies and models. In: Proceedings of PTRC 22nd European Transport Forum: Transportation Planning Methods. University of Warwick. 12–16 September 1994: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK (1996) Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (2nd edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall S & McLellan A (1998) Reducing the need to travel: a European guide to good practice. In: Proceedings of PTRC 26th European Transport Conference: Policy, Planning and Sustainability. Loughborough University. 14–18 September 1998: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D, Talvitie A, Cosslett S, Hasan I, Johnson M, Reid F & Train K (1978) Demand Model Estimation and Validation. ITS. UTDFP. Final Report Series. Vol. 5. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin P (1989) Integration of public transit into land use decision: US case studies. In: Proceedings of PTRC 17th European Transport and Planning Annual Meeting: Transport Policy. University of Sussex. 11–15 September 1989: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P (1996) Sustainable cities: an Australian model used in the states of the environment process. In: Proceedings of PTRC 24th European Transport Forum: Transport Policy and its Implementation. Brunel University, 2–6 September 1996: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman MZ (1993) A conceptual model of retail image influences on loyalty patronage behaviour. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research: 133–148.

  • Ploeger J & Baanders A (1995) Land use and transport planning in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of PTRC 23rd European Transport Forum: Transport Policy and its Implementation. University of Warwick. 11–15 September 1995: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn MJ (1994) Land use planning and reducing the need to travel: the UK government's Planning Policy Guidance Note 13 – Transport. In: Proceedings of PTRC 22nd European Transport Forum: Environmental Issues. University of Warwick 12–16 September 1994: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker W & Golob TF (1976) An attitudinal modal choice model. Transportation Research 10: 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker W & Stevens R (1976) Attitudinal models of modal choice: the multinomial case for selected nonwork trips. Transportation 5: 355–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards M & Ben-Akiva M (1974) A simultaneous destination and mode choice model for shopping trips. Transportation 3: 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AJ, Ampt ES & Meyburg AH (1995) Survey Methods for Transport Planning. Australia: Eucalyptus Press. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G & Ampt E (2001) Travel blending: an Australian travel awareness initiative. Transportation Research Part D 6: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1994) Eighteenth Report: Transport and the Environment. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimek P (1996) Automobile and public transit use in the United States and Canada: comparison in the postwar trends. Transportation Research Record 1521: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherret A and Wallace J (1973) Product attributes. In: Brand D (ed) Urban Travel Demand Forecasting. Special Report 143. Highway Research Board: Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki T, Kazunori H & Shihana SM (1994) Comparative study of transportation modal choice in Asian countries. Transportation Research Record 1441: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaethling D (1996) Sustainable transportation: the American experience. In: Proceeding of PTRC 24th European Transport Forum: Planning for Sustainability. Brunel University. 2–6 September 1996: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Vlek C & Rooijers T (1995) Private car mobility, problem awareness, willingness to change and policy evaluation: a national interview study among Dutch car users. In: Zwerver S, van Rompaey R, Kok M & Berk M (eds) Climate Change Research: Evaluation and Policy Implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (1998) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertoolen G & Verstraten E (1995) Changing attitudes and behaviour by means of providing information. A study on private car use. In: Zwerver S, van Rompaey R, Kok M & Berk M. (eds) Climate Change Research: Evaluation and Policy Implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (1998) A survey of commuting: to travel hopefully. The Economist 384(8084): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans H (1982) Consumer choice of shopping centre: an information integration approach. Regional Studies 16(3): 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R (1985) An introduction to applied qualitative research. In: Walker R (ed) Applied Qualitative Research. Vermont: Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (1978) Factors affecting modal choice decision in urban travel. Transportation Research 12: 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J & Cooper H (1983) A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, M.F. Car ownership and attitudes towards transport modes for shopping purposes in Singapore. Transportation 30, 435–457 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024701011162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024701011162

Navigation