Abstract
In the received model of the voluntary provision of a pure public good, the usual practice is to proceed from assumptions about the group characteristics to inferences about an implied outcome. The approach advocated in this paper reverses the traditional direction. Assuming a Nash equilibrium, we ask how to characterize the diverse set of group characteristics which will support it. Approaching the problem from this angle we define three crucial characteristics of a group-equilibrium: consumer's “free rider inducing supply,” “zero contribution-inducing wealth” and “voluntary surplus tribute” which is the amount by which a person's actual income exceeds his/her “zero-contribution inducing wealth.” Defining these indicators we show how they form the foundation of a complete mapping between the distribution of individual characteristics of a group, and equilibrium public good supply. Certain questions such as the interaction between size of the group and heterogeneity of incomes and tastes not yet adequately addressed are shown to yield easily to this approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreoni, J. (1988). “Privately Provided Public Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism.” Journal of Public Economics 35, 57-73.
Andreoni, J. and M. C. McGuire. (1993). “Identifying the Free Riders: A Simple Algorithm for Determining Who Will Contribute to a Public Good.” Journal of Public Economics 51, 447-454.
Bergstrom T., L. Blume, and H. Varian. (1986). “On the Private Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 29, 25-49.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler. (1981). “Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Collective Action.”Working Paper No. 060 in Economics and Econometrics. Canberra: Australian National University.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler. (1984). “Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods.” Economic Journal 94(3), 580-598.
Cornes, R. and R. Hartley. (2002). “Aggregate Games and Public Economics.” Presented at International Institute of Public Finance 58th Congress, Helsinki, Finland.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler. (1996). The Theory Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler. (2000). “Pareto-Improving Redistribution and Pure Public Goods.” German Economic Review 1(2), 169-186.
Fries, T. L., E. Golding and R. Romano. (1991). “Private Provision of Public Goods and the Failure of the Neutrality Property in a Large Finite Economies.” International Economic Review 32(1), 147-157.
Ihori, T. (1996). “International Public Goods and Contribution Productivity Differentials.” Journal of Public Economics 61, 139-154.
Jack, B. C. (1991). International Public Goods: The Economics of their Provision and Cost-Control Incentives under the Cournot-Nash Hypothesis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
McGuire, M. C. (1974). “Group Homogeneity and Aggregate Provision of a Pure Public Good under Cournot Behavior.” Public Choice 18, 107-126.
McGuire, M. C. and C. Groth. (1985). “A Method for Identifying the Public Good Resource Allocation Process within a Group.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 915-934.
McGuire, M. C. (1991). “Identifying the Free Riders: How to Partition a Group into Positive and Zero Contributors.” Working Paper. Dept. of Economics, University of Maryland.
Olson, M. L. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sandler, T. (1992). Collective Action: Theory and Applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sandler, T. (1997). Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shibata, H. (1971). “A Bargaining Model of a Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Journal of Political Economy79, 1-29.
Shrestha, R. K. (2002). “An Improved Algorithm for Identifying Free Riders.” Working Paper. Dept. of Economics, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Warr, P. G. (1983). “The Private Provision of Public Good is Independent of Distribution of Income.” Economics Letters 13, 207-211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcguire, M.C., Shrestha, R.K. A New Approach to Group Structure, Burden Sharing, and the Equilibrium Provision of Public Goods. International Tax and Public Finance 10, 341–356 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024694322469
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024694322469