Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness and Safety of the PEGT/PBT Copolymer Scaffold as Dermal Substitute in Scar Reconstruction Wounds (Feasibility Trial)

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin defects left after excision of hypertrophic scars were treated with a dermal substitute and split-thickness skin grafts transplanted after vascularisation of the substitute. The used substitute was a synthetic porous scaffold made from the biodegradable copolymer polyethyleneglycol-terephtalate and polybuthylene-terephtalate. The study was designed to assess the rate of granulation tissue formation, graft take, and after 3 and 12 months the quality of life (pain, comfort of treatment, cosmetic or functional nuisance), scar formation and wound contraction. In addition, scaffold biodegradation and scar tissue formation were evaluated histologically.

Seven patients with different causes of burn injury were enrolled, of which 5 completed the study. In the first 4 patients the time between scaffold application and split-thickness skin overgrafting was in between 17 and 24 days. The time point of overgrafting was significantly reduced to 10–12 days by meshing of the dermal scaffold as evidenced in the last 3 patients. Histological evaluation at 3 months revealed normal generation of dermal tissue, however, the collagen bundles were parallel organized like in scar tissue. In the deeper layers of the neodermis, fragments of the dermal substitute were present, causing a mild inflammatory response. One year post-treatment, some fragments of the copolymer were still observed. The extent of wound contraction after successful overgrafting ranged from 30% to 57% after 1 year. All 5 patients showed an improvement in the total Vancouver Scar Score compared to the value before scar removal being similar to what can be expected when treated with split-thickness skin grafts alone. No unanticipated adverse effects due to application of the substitute were observed.

We conclude that although this synthetic dermal substitute can be safely used in humans, the presence of 3D dermal template in a full-thickness skin defect will not automatically improve the skin tissue regeneration process or inhibit wound contraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Bakker D and Ponec M (1993a) Cell-seeding and in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of polymeric matrices of PEO/PBT copolymers and PLLA. Biomaterials 14: 598–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Bakker D and Ponec M (1993b) A new biodegradable matrix as part of a cell seeded skin substitute for the treatment of deep skin defects: A physico-chemical characterisation. Clin Mater 14: 21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA and Ponec M (1994a) Biocompatibility of a biodegradable matrix used as a skin substitute: An in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res 28: 545–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA and Ponec M (1994b) Degradative behaviour of polymeric matrices in (sub)dermal and muscle tissue of the rat: A quantitative study. Biomaterials 15: 551–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce ST, Warden GD and Holder IA (1995a) Non-cytotoxic combinations of topical antimicrobials agents for use with cultured skin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39: 1324–1328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce ST, Goretsky MJ, Greenhalgh DG, Kagan RJ, Rieman MT and Warden GD (1995b) Comparative assessment of cultured skin substitutes and native skin autograft for treatment of full-thickness burns. Ann Surg 22: 743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WC Jr, Bondoc CC and Jung WK (1981) Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury. Ann Surg 194: 413–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper ML, Hansbrough JF, Spielvogel RL, Cohen R, Bartel RL and Naughton G (1991) In vivo optimization of a living dermal substitute employing cultured human fibroblasts on a biodegradable polyglycolic acid or polyglactin mesh. Biomaterials 12: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuono C, Langdon R and McGuire J (1986) Use of cultured epidermal autografts and dermal allografts as skin replacement after burn injury. Lancet 17(1): 1123–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries HJ, Zeegelaar JE, Middelkoop E, et al. (1995a) Reduced wound contraction and scar formation in punch biopsy wounds. Native collagen dermal substitutes, a clinical study. Br J Dermatol 132: 690–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries HJ, Middelkoop E, van Heemstra-Hoen M, Wildevuur CH and Westerhof W (1995b) Stromal cells from subcutaneous adipose tissue seeded in a native collagen/elastin dermal substitute reducewound contraction in full thickness skin defects. Lab Invest 73: 532–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Hadidy M, Tesauro P, Cavallini M, Colonna M, Rizzo F and Signorini M (1994) Contraction and growth of deep burn wounds covered by non-meshed and meshed split thickness skin grafts in humans. Burns 20: 226–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansbrough JF, Dore C and Hansbrough WB (1992) Clinical trials of a living dermal tissue replacement placed beneath meshed, split-thickness skin grafts on excised burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 13: 519–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansbrough JF, Morgan JL, Greenleaf GE and Bartel R (1993) Composite grafts of human keratinocytes grown on a polyglactin mesh-cultured fibroblast dermal substitute function as a bilayer skin replacement in full-thickness wounds on athymic mice. J Burn Care Rehabil 14: 485–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J, et al. (1988) Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 208: 313–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme EN, Van Leeuwen RT, Brandsma K, Van Marle J and Middelkoop E (2000) Higher numbers of autologous fibroblasts in an artificial dermal substitute improve tissue regeneration and modulate scar tissue formation. J Pathol 190: 595–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme EN, van Leeuwen RT, Jonker A, van Marle J and Middelkoop E (1998) Living skin substitutes: Survival and function of fibroblasts seeded in a dermal substitute in experimental wounds. J Invest Dermatol 111: 989–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moiemen NS, Staiano JJ, Ojeh NO, Thway Y and Frame JD (2001) Reconstructive surgery with a dermal regeneration template: Clinical and histologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 93–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelmans K, Haworth S, Lawlor T, Speck W, Tainer B and Zeiger E (1986) Salmonella mutagenicity tests: II. Results from the testing of 270 chemicals. Environ Mutagen 8(Suppl 7): 1–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nave M (1992) Wound bed preparations: Approaches to replacement of dermis. J Burn Care Rehabil 13: 147–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie L, Nicolau DP, Nightingale CH, Browner BD and Quintiliani R (1995) In vitro elution of ofloxacin from a bioabsorbable polymer. Acta Orthop Scand 66: 365–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Press B (1997) Thermal, electrical, and chemical injuries. In: Sherrell JA, Beasley RW and Thorne CHM (eds) Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery, 5th edition, pp 161–189. Lippincott- Raven Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder AM, Davies JE, Leenders H and van Blitterswijk CA (1994a) Interfacial behavior of PEO/PBT copolymers (Polyactive) in a calvarial system: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res 28: 269–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radder AM, Leenders H and van Blitterswijk CA (1994b) Interface reactions to PEO/PBT copolymers (Polyactive) after implantation in cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res 28: 141–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radder AM, Leenders H and van Blitterswijk CA (1996) Application of porous PEO/PBT copolymers for bone replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 30: 341–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick SA, Cocker R and Parker A (2001) Evaluation of acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) sheet for soft tissue augmentation: A 1-year follow-up of clinical observations and histological findings. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3: 101–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern R, McPherson M and Longaker MT (1990) Histologic study of artificial skin used in the treatment of full thickness thermal injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 11: 7–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, McIver E and Courtemanche DJ (1990) Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 11: 256–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dorp AG, Verhoeven MC, Koerten HK, Van Der Nat-Van Der Meij TH, Van Blitterswijk CA and Ponec M (1998) Dermal regeneration in full-thickness wounds in Yucatan miniature pigs using a biodegradable copolymer. Wound Repair Regen 6: 556–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dorp AG, Verhoeven MC, Koerten HK, van Blitterswijk CA and Ponec M (1999) Bilayered biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(butylene terephthalate) copolymer (Polyactive) as substrate for human fibroblasts and keratinocytes. J Biomed Mater Res 47: 292–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zuijlen PP, van Trier AJ, Vloemans JF, Groeneveldt F, Kreis RW and Middelkoop E (2000) Graft survival and effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns and reconstructive surgery in a one-stage grafting model. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 615–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright DJ (1995) Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 21: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yannas IV, Burke JF, Gordon PL, Huang C and Rubenstein RH (1980) Design of an artificial skin. II. Control of chemical composition. J Biomed Mater Res 14: 107–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Burns and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Brno-Bohunice, Jihlavska 20, 639 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    I. Mensik & P. Brychta

  2. IsoTis N.V., Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    E.N. Lamme & J. Riesle

Authors
  1. I. Mensik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E.N. Lamme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Riesle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Brychta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Brychta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mensik, I., Lamme, E., Riesle, J. et al. Effectiveness and Safety of the PEGT/PBT Copolymer Scaffold as Dermal Substitute in Scar Reconstruction Wounds (Feasibility Trial). Cell Tissue Banking 3, 245–253 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024674325253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024674325253

Keywords

Search

Navigation