Abstract
Advocates of immigration to save Social Security (S.S.) assume that a pay-as-you-go system will work over the long run. That assumption is not shared by the Social Security Board of Trustees. Reflection shows that it would entail ever-larger new cohorts of immigrants to support those who are retiring, in effect, a Ponzi scheme. In fact, the benefits structure of the S.S. system, which pays out proportionately more to low-wage earners than to high-wage earners relative to their contributions, taken together with the income profile of post-1969 immigrants, means that the more immigration which occurs, the deeper into insolvency the system falls.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Board of Trustees (1995). Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Disability Insurance Trust Funds. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Hansen, Kristin A. & Bacher, Amara (1995). The foreign-born population: 1994. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Huddle, Donald L. (1993). The costs of immigration. Washington, DC: Carrying Capacity Network.
Huddle, Donald L. (1995). The costs of 1994 immigration. Washington, DC: Carrying Capacity Network.
Huddle, Donald L. & Simcox, David (1994). The impact of immigration on the Social Security System. Population and Environment, 16(1), 91-98.
Immigrants Get Cash Aid at Twice the Rate of Citizens, GAO Says (February 9, 1995). San Francisco Chronicle, p. A10.
National Association of Hispanic Publications & US Census Bureau (1995). Hispanic Latinos: Diverse people in a multicultural society. Washington, DC: Author.
Nichols, Orlo R. (1995). 1995 Social Security Trustees Report, Alternative 2. Mimeo, June, 1995, pp. 1-6.
Simcox, David and S. Tordella, 1993. A comparison of native-and foreign-Born, poverty and public assistance use: 1990, CP-3-1. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huddle, D.L. Post-1969 Immigration and the Example of the Insolvency of the Social Security System. Population and Environment 19, 533–539 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024664608242
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024664608242