Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Associated with Interagency Coordination in a Child Mental Health Service System Demonstration

  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of coordination between agencies in children's mental health service systems is important for program planning and evaluation. This article reports on the findings of a multiple regression analysis that examined factors associated with coordination between 63 agencies during a child mental health service demonstration. Greater coordination of activities was significantly associated with dyads that (a) helped each other attain individual agency goals (p<.001), (b) were influential in shaping mental health policy and programs (p<.01), (c) maintained resource linkages over time (p<.001), and (d) operated in the same service sector (p=.01). From a resource dependency perspective, findings suggest that coordination is facilitated when interorganizational relationships fulfill both the internal agency needs for goal attainment and the external needs for exerting control over the larger policy and program environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich, H. (1976). Resource dependence and interorganizational relations: Local employment service offices and social services sector organizations. Administration & Society, 7(4), 419–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickman, L., Guthrie, P.R., Foster, E.M., Lambert, E.W., Summerfelt, W.T., Breda, C.S., & Heflinger, C.A. (1995). Evaluating managed mental health services: The Fort Bragg experiment. New York: Plenum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickman, L., Noser, K., & Summerfelt, W.T. (1999). Long-term effects of a system of care on children and adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 26(2), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D.M., & Whetten, D.A. (1981). Effects of organizational strategies and contextual constraints on centrality and attributions of influence in interorganizational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 378–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B.J. (2001). Commentary on the special issue on the National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9 (1), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B.J., & Hoagwood, K. (2002). Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, S.P., & Horton, G.T. (1975). Integration of human services: The state and municipal levels. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G.D., & Biggs, R.S. (1992). Analytic mapping and geographic databases. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., & James, L. (1992). The interorganizational coordination of services to children in state custody. Administration in Social Work, 16(3/4), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, H.H., Morrissey, J.P., Rosenheck, R.A. Cocozza, J.J., Randolph, F.L, & Blasinski, M. (2002). Lessons from the evaluation of the ACCESS Program. Psychiatric Services, 53(8), 967–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.H., Clark, J., Giordano, P.C., Johnson, P.V., & Van Roekel, M. (1977). Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 457–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heflinger, C.A. (1993). Final report of the implementation of the Fort Bragg evaluation project Volume III, Appendix I: An interorganizational approach to evaluating the implementation of the Fort Bragg child and adolescent mental health demonstration project. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Center for Mental Health Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heflinger, C.A., & Northrup, D.A. (2000). Community-level changes in behavioral health care following capitated contracting. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(2), 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagwood, K. (1997). Interpreting nullity: The Fort Bragg Experiment—A comparative success or failure? American Psychologist, 52(5), 546–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, S., Nesman, T., & Hernandez, M. (1999). Promising practices: Building collaboration in systems of care. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children's Mental Health, 1998 Series, Volume VI. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, M.C., Morrissey, J.P., & Calloway, M.O. (1996). Structure and change in child mental health service delivery networks. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(3), 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S.L. (1993). Integrating services for children and families: Understanding the past to shape the future. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S., & White, P.E. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.R., & McBride, K. (1985). Resources, homophily, and dependence: Organizational attributes and asymmetric ties in human services networks. Social Science Research, 14, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E., & Hylton, L.F. (1962). Interorganizational analysis: A hypothesis on co-ordinating agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 395–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • MapInfo Corporation. (1994). MapInfo User's Guide. Troy, New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattessich, P.W., & Monsey, B.R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work—A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M.K. (1993). Organizational factors in the integration of services for children. Social Service Review, 67(4), 547–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B.B. (1993). Managing dynamic tensions in social change coalitions. In T. Mizrahi & J. Morrison (Eds.), Community organization and social administration: Advances, trends and emerging principles (pp. 11–35). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, J.P. (1992). An interorganizational network approach to evaluating children's mental health service systems. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), New directions for program evaluation (Vol. 54, pp. 85–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, J.P., Johnsen, M.C., & Calloway, M.O. (1997). Evaluating performance and change in mental health systems serving children and youth: An interorganizational network approach. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24(1), 4–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, J.P., Johnsen, M.C., & Calloway, M.O. (1998). Methods for system-level evaluations of child mental health service networks. In M. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (pp. 297–327). Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C.L. (1984). Interorganizational relations: Implications for community development. (Vol. IV). New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina Department of Human Resources; Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. (1990). North Carolina Mental Health Services Program for Youth. Raleigh, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina Department of Human Resources; Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. (1993). North Carolina's Mental Health Services Program for Youth: Annual report to Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—Year 3. Raleigh, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandiani, J.A., Banks, S.M., & Schacht, L.M. (1999). Caseload segregation/integration: A measure of shared responsibility for children and adolescents. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7(2), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, T. (1992). Effectiveness of informal linkages among mental health agencies. In A. Algarin & R.M. Friedman (Eds.), Fourth annual research conference proceedings, A system of care for children's mental health (pp. 167–173). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (1997). Stata statistical software: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B.A., & Friedman, R.M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (1991, November). Adolescent health—Volume II: Background and the effectiveness of selected prevention and treatment services, OTA-H-466. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A., & Ferry, D. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H., & Walker, G. (1984). The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 598–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H., Walker, G., & Liston, J. (1979). Coordination patterns within an interorganizational network. Human Relations, 32(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, N.B., Brannan, A.M., Baughman, L.N., Wilces, M., & Gawron, T. (2001). The system of care model: Implementation in twenty-seven communities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(1), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivard, J.C., Morrissey, J.P. Factors Associated with Interagency Coordination in a Child Mental Health Service System Demonstration. Adm Policy Ment Health 30, 397–415 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024641630430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024641630430

Navigation