Skip to main content
Log in

Social Monitoring as Social Control: The Case of Drug Testing in a Medical Workplace

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

While workplace drug testing has received considerable public and scholarly attention, little of this discussion has focused on the social context within which testing is likely to occur. This paper conceptualizes drug testing as social monitoring and examines testing within a framework suggested by Donald Black's theory of social control. The central idea is that the formality of social monitoring within a group is a function of its members' social status and the social distance among them. The paper evaluates this argument in one empirical setting. Analysis of data from U.S. departments of anesthesiology indicates that drug testing, an example of formal monitoring, most often emerges in a context marked by low normative respectability and a lack of intimate relationships. The paper concludes by suggesting how variations in monitoring procedures like drug testing may affect ensuing processes of social control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Management Association 1992 “American Management Association survey reveals increased workplace drug testing, lower 'test-positive rates.'” AMA News (April 2).

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists 1992 “Survey of substance abuse.” William P. Arnold III, M.D., Principal Investigator. Unpublished final report, Center for Survey Research, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

  • Angarola, R. T. 1991 “Substance abuse testing in the workplace: Legal issues and corporate responses.” In R. H. Coombs and L. J. West (eds.), Drug Testing: Issues and Options: 155–189. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. P. 1988 The Moral Order of A Suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 “War and peace in early childhood.” Virginia Review of Sociology. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., D. Rauma, D. R. Loseke, and S. F. Berk 1982 “Throwing the cops back out: The decline of a local program to make the criminal justice system more responsive to incidents of domestic violence.” Social Science Research 11:245–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Donald 1976 The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Donald, ed. 1984 Toward a General Theory of Social Control. Volume 1: Fundamentals; Volume 2: Selected Problems. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

  • Borg, Marian J. 1992 “Conflict management in the modern world system.” Sociological Forum 7:261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 “The structure of social monitoring in the process of social control.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deviant Behavior 18:273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, Mark 1994 “Evidence as partisanship.” Law and Society Review 28:833–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, Stephen M. and Sandra J. Hartman 1992 “Drugs in the workplace: Overstating the problems and the cures.” Journal of Drug Issues 22:923–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Michael M. 1993 “Drugs in the workplace: Setting the record straight.” Journal of Drug Issues 23:727–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Sandra J. and Stephen M. Crow 1993 “Drugs in the workplace: Setting Harris straight.” Journal of Drug Issues 23:733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael 1987 Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, Allan V. 1990 The Logic of Social Control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imwinkelried, E. J. 1987 “Some preliminary thoughts on the wisdom of governmental prohibition or regulation of private employee urinalysis testing.” Clinical Chemistry 33(suppl. 11):19B-32B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Gary T. 1988 Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville, Mike, Andrew Sanders, and Roger Leng 1991 The Case for the Prosecution. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall 1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, Calvin 1995 The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, Jeffrey 1995 “Medical malpractice, social-structure, and social-control.” Sociological Forum 10:135–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, Steven L. 1993 The Costs of Privacy: Reputation and Surveillance in America. New York: A. de. Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, Steven L. and Paul W. Kingston 1990 The Sociology of Public Issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normand, J. and S. Salyards 1989 “An empirical evaluation of preemployment drug testing in the united states postal service: Interim report and findings.” In S. W. Gust and J. M. Walsh (eds.), Drugs in the Workplace: 111–138. NIDA Research Monograph No. 91, Washington, DC.

  • Normand, J., S. Salyards, and J. Mahoney 1990 “An evaluation of preemployment drug testing.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75:629–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, D. C. 1989 “Relation of preemployment drug testing result to employment status: A one-year follow-up.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 4:44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara F. and Christy A. Visher 1986 “The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors' decisions.” Law and Society Review 20:423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, Dennis W. 1981 “Dangerous places.” Social Forces 60:74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, Dennis W. and Pamela A. Maier 1991 “Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of 'hot spots.'” Criminology 29:725–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. Laurence 1980 Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. Second edition. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, James B. 1974 Private Lives and Public Surveillance. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, James 1989 “Employee theft as social control.” Deviant Behavior 10:319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office, General Government Division 1988 Employee Drug Testing: Information on Private Sector Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Louis Jolyon and Deborah L. Ackerman 1993 “The drug testing controversy.” Journal of Drug Issues 23:579–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Saron and Albert M. Bugaj 1990 “The Social Impact of Courtroom Witnesses.” Social Behavior 5:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwerling, C., J. Ryan, and E. J. Orav 1992 “Costs and benefits of preemployment screening.” Journal of American Medical Association 267:91–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borg, M.J., Arnold III, W.P. Social Monitoring as Social Control: The Case of Drug Testing in a Medical Workplace. Sociological Forum 12, 441–460 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024629311818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024629311818

Navigation