Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 381–458 | Cite as

Event Calculus, Nominalisation, and the Progressive

  • Fritz Hamm
  • Michiel van Lambalgen
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abney, S.: 1987, ‘The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect’, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, N.: 1992, ‘A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, N.: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, J.: 1961, ‘Truth’, in Philosophical Papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Bach, E.: 1986a, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, E.: 1986b, ‘Natural Language Metaphysics’, In: R. B. Marcus, G. Dorn and P. Weingartner (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII. Studies in Logic 114, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Bonomi, A.: 1997, ‘The Progressive and the Structure of Events’, Journal of Semantics 14, 173–205.Google Scholar
  8. Cantini, A.: 1996, Logical Frameworks for Truth and Abstraction, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Chierchia, G.: 1988, Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Garland Publishing, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in A. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham (MA), pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Cresswell, M.: 1973, Logics and Languages, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  13. Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Dowty, D.: 1991, ‘Thematic Proto–Roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67, 547–619.Google Scholar
  15. Eckardt, R. (ed.): 1998, Adverbs, Events, and Other Things, Niemeyer, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  16. Feferman, S.: 1984, ‘Toward Useful Type-Free Theories I’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 75–111.Google Scholar
  17. Gamut, L. T. F.: 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning: Volume II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Hamm, F., A. Holzapfel and S. Schüle: 1998, ‘Nominalisierungstypen im Akatek Maya und im Japanischen’, STUF 51, 228–255.Google Scholar
  19. Hamm, F. and M. van Lambalgen: 2002, ‘Intensionality and Coercion’, to appear in R Kahle (ed.), Intensionality, ASL Lecture Notes in Logic.Google Scholar
  20. Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’, Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.Google Scholar
  21. Hodges, W.: 1993, Model Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Jespersen, O.: 1933, Essentials of English Grammar, Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  23. Kalsbeek, M. B. and Y. Jiang: 1995, ‘A Vademecum of of Ambivalent Logic’, in K. Apt and F. Turini (eds.), Meta-logics and Logic Programming, MIT Press, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
  24. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht..Google Scholar
  25. Kleene, S.: 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, Princeton.Google Scholar
  26. Kowalski, R. A. and M. Sergot: 1986, ‘A Logic-based Calculus of Events’, New Generation Computing 4, 65–97.Google Scholar
  27. Krifka, M.: 1989) Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution, Fink, München.Google Scholar
  28. Landman, F.: 1992, ‘The Progressive’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
  29. Lasersohn, P.: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction and Events, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Lifschitz, V.: 1994, ‘Circumscription’, in D. Gabbay, C. Hogger and J. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming: Vol 3, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Link, G.: 1987, ‘Algebraic Semantics for Event Structures’, in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof and F. Veltman (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium.Google Scholar
  32. McCarthy, J. and P. Hayes: 1969, ‘Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence’, in D. Michie and B. Meltzer (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  33. Mendelson, E.: 1987, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Wadsworth & Brooks, Pacific Grove.Google Scholar
  34. Naumann, R. and Ch. Piñón: 1997, ‘Decomposing the Progressive’, in P. Dekker, M. Stokhof and Y. Venema (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  36. Portner, P.: 1991, ‘Situation Theory and the Semantics of Propositional Expressions’, PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  37. Poutsma, H.: 1923, The Infinitive, the Gerund and the Particles of the English Verb, Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar
  38. Pullum, G.: 1991, ‘English Nominal Gerund Phrases as Noun Phrases with Verb-Phrase Heads’, Linguistics 29, 763–799.Google Scholar
  39. Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  40. Reuland, E.: 1983, ‘Governing-ing’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 10–34.Google Scholar
  41. Richards, B.: 1974, ‘A Point of View’, Synthese 28(4), 431–445.Google Scholar
  42. Sato, T.: 1992, ‘Meta-programming through a Truth Predicate’, in K. Apt (ed.), Proceedings JICSLP, MIT Press, pp. 526–540.Google Scholar
  43. Scalise, S.: 1984, Generative Morphology, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  44. Schachter, P.: 1976, ‘A Nontransformational Account of Gerundive Nominals in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 7, 1–55.Google Scholar
  45. Shanahan, M.: 1990, ‘Representing Continous Change in The Event Calculus’, in Proceedings ECAI 90, pp. 598–603.Google Scholar
  46. Shanahan, M.: 1995, ‘A Circumscriptive Calculus of Events’, Artificial Intelligence 77, 249–287.Google Scholar
  47. Shanahan, M.: 1996a, ‘A Logical Account of the Common Sense Informatic Situation for a Mobile Robot’, London.Google Scholar
  48. Shanahan, M.: 1996b, ‘Robotics and the Common Sense Informatic Situation’, in Working Notes of Common Sense 96, The Third Symposium on Logical Formalisation of Commonsense, pp. 186–198.Google Scholar
  49. Shanahan, M.: 1997, Solving the Frame Problem – A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Inertia, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  50. Spencer, A.: 1991, Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Stassen, L.: 1997, Intransitive Predication, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Steedman, M.: 1997, ‘Temporality’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  53. van Lambalgen, M. and F. Hamm: 2001, ‘Moschovakis’ Notion of Meaning as Applied to Linguistics', to appear in M. Baaz, J. Krajicek (eds.), Logic Colloquium 2001, ASL Lecture Notes in Logic.Google Scholar
  54. Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Vendler, Z.: 1968, Adjectives and Nominalizations, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  56. Verkuyl, H.: 1993, A Theory of Aspectability. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  57. Westerståhl, D.: 1989, ‘Quantifiers in Formal and Natural Languages’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol IV, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  58. Zucchi, A.: 1993, The Language of Propositions and Events, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  59. Zucchi, S.: 1999, ‘Incomplete Events, Intensionality and Imperfective Aspect’, Natural Language Semantics 7, 179–215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritz Hamm
    • 1
  • Michiel van Lambalgen
    • 2
  1. 1.Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität TübingenTübingen
  2. 2.FGW/ILLC Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations