Sex Roles

, Volume 49, Issue 5–6, pp 233–246 | Cite as

Who Is a Good Organizational Citizen? Social Perception of Male and Female Employees Who Use Family Leave



In this study, we examined perceptions of the citizenship behaviors of male and female employees who took leave to care for a newborn, a sick child, a sick parent, or who did not take leave. In a 2 (employee gender) × 4 (reason for leave) × 2 (participant gender) experimental design, 242 undergraduate students read a mock personnel file and rated the employee on altruism and generalized compliance. Female employees were not rated differently whether they took leave or not. Male employees who took leave for birth or eldercare were rated less likely to be altruistic at work than their male counterparts who did not take leave and their female counterparts who took leave. There was also a bias against male leave takers for generalized compliance ratings, especially by male evaluators. Future research ideas and implications for organizational practice are discussed.

family leave organizational citizenship gender role stereotypes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139-158.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T., & Rush, M. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T., & Russell, J. (1999). Parental leave of absence: Some not so family-friendly implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 166-191.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, T., Russell, J., & Rush, M. (1994). The effects of gender and leave of absence on attributions for high performance, perceived organizational commitment, and allocation of organizational rewards. Sex Roles, 31, 443-465.Google Scholar
  5. Bachrach, D. G., Bendoly, E., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2001). Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1285-1293.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J., & Rao, J. (1997). Balancing employment and fatherhood: A systems perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 386-402.Google Scholar
  8. Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.Google Scholar
  9. Commission on Family and Medical Leave. (1996). A workable balance: A report to congress on family and medical leave policies. Retrieved October 2, 2000, from Scholar
  10. Deutsch, F., Lussier, J., & Servis, L. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1154-1166.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., & Douthitt, S. S. (1999). The role of nonperformance factors on job-related relocation opportunities: A field study and laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 29-55.Google Scholar
  13. Etaugh, C., & Study, G. (1989). Demographic predictors of college students' attitudes toward working mothers. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 465-466.Google Scholar
  14. Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-3. Retrieved October 2, 2000, from Scholar
  15. Galinsky, E., & Stein, P. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees: Balancing work/family life. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 368-383.Google Scholar
  16. Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, D. (1989, December). Moving beyond the "mommy track": An organization change approach. Personnel, 23-29.Google Scholar
  18. Hui, C., Lam, S. K., & Law, K. S. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 822-828.Google Scholar
  19. Hyde, J., Essex, M., & Horton, F. (1993). Fathers and parental leave: Attitudes and experiences. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 616-638.Google Scholar
  20. Israeloff, R. (1995). The truth about paternity leave. Parents, 1, 98-100.Google Scholar
  21. Judiesch, M., & Lyness, K. (1999). Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers' career success. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 641-651.Google Scholar
  22. Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128-144.Google Scholar
  23. Kerpelman, J., & Schvanaveldt, P. (1999). Young adults' anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41, 189-217.Google Scholar
  24. Kidder, D. L., & Parks, J. M. (2001). The good soldier: Who is s(he)? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 939-959.Google Scholar
  25. Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 602-609.Google Scholar
  26. Konrad, A., & Hartmann, L. (2001). Gender differences in attitudes toward affirmative action programs in Australia: Effects of beliefs, interests, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 45, 415-432.Google Scholar
  27. Landau, J., & Arthur, M. (1992). The relationship of marital status, spouse's career status, and gender to salary level. Sex Roles, 27, 665-681.Google Scholar
  28. Larbuckle, J. (2002). Amos Graphics (Version 4.01). Chicago, IL: Small Waters Corp.Google Scholar
  29. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.Google Scholar
  30. Levande, D., Herrick, J., & Sung, K. (2000). Eldercare in the United States and South Korea. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 632-652.Google Scholar
  31. Levine, J. (1997). Working fathers: Balancing work and families. Reading, MA: Addison.Google Scholar
  32. Levine, K. (1993, August). Is today's workplace really family friendly? Parents, pp. 30-34.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, S. (1996). Rethinking employment: An organizational culture change framework. In S. Lewis & J. Lewis (Eds.), The work-family challenge: Rethinking employment (pp. 1-19). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, S., & Taylor, K. (1996). Evaluating the impact of family-friendly employer policies: A case study. In S. Lewis & J. Lewis (Eds.), The work-family challenge: Rethinking employment (pp. 112-127). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Lobel, S., & St. Clair, L. (1992). Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1057-1069.Google Scholar
  36. Lovell, S., Kahn, A., Anton, J., Davidson, A., Dowling, E., Post, D., et al. (1999). Does gender affect the link between organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluation? Sex Roles, 41, 469-478.Google Scholar
  37. Lyness, K., Thompson, C., Francesco, A., & Judiesch, M. (1999). Work and pregnancy: Individual and organizational factors influencing organizational commitment, timing of maternity leave, and return to work. Sex Roles, 41, 485-508.Google Scholar
  38. MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 123-150.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, A., & Tsiantar, D. (1991, November 25). Mommy tracks. Newsweek, pp. 48-49.Google Scholar
  40. Morris, B. (1997, March 17). Is your family wrecking your career (and vice versa)? Fortune, pp. 71-76, 80, 86, 90.Google Scholar
  41. Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Information processing in personnel decisions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, 1-44.Google Scholar
  42. Norman, N., & Tedeschi, J. (1984). Paternity leave: The unpopular benefit option. Personnel Administrator, 2, 390-443.Google Scholar
  43. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  45. Organ, D., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-902.Google Scholar
  46. Orr, J. M., Sackett, P. R., & Mercer, M. (1989). The role of prescribed and nonprescribed behavior in estimating the dollar value of performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 34-42.Google Scholar
  47. Park, O. S., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1989). Beyond cognition in leadership: Prosocial behavior and affect in managerial judgment. Working paper, Management Department, Seoul National University and Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  48. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, J., Paine, J., & Bachrach, D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.Google Scholar
  49. Rothausen, T. (1999). "Family" in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 817-836.Google Scholar
  50. Ruble, T. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 1970s. Sex Roles, 9, 397-402.Google Scholar
  51. Russo, N. (1976). The motherhood mandate. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 143-153.Google Scholar
  52. Scarr, S., & Eisenberg, M. (1993). Child care research: Issues, perspectives, and results. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 613-644.Google Scholar
  53. Schneer, J., & Reitman, F. (1990). Effects of employment gaps on the careers of MBA's: More damaging for men than for women? Academy of Management Journal, 33, 391-406.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, C. A., Organ, D., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.Google Scholar
  55. Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.Google Scholar
  56. US Census Bureau. (1999). Statistical abstract of the United States: The national data book Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  57. Steiger, J. (1990). Some additional thoughts on components, factors, and factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 41-45.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, C., Beauvais, L., & Lyness, K. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.Google Scholar
  59. Wagner, D., & Neal, M., (1994). Caregiving and work: Consequences, correlates, and workplace responses. Educational Gerontology, 20, 645-663.Google Scholar
  60. Wells, S. (2000). The elder care gap. HR Magazine, 45, 38-46.Google Scholar
  61. Werner, J. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98-107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem
  2. 2.Pennsylvania State University, State CollegePennsylvania

Personalised recommendations