Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 399–419 | Cite as

Correlates of Increased Sexual Satisfaction

  • Elina Haavio-Mannila
  • Osmo Kontula
Article

Abstract

Comparisons of nationally representative survey data of the population ages 18–54 years in 1971 (N = 2252) and 1992 (N = 1718) from Finland show that sexual satisfaction has greatly increased particularly among women. Some predictors of sexual satisfaction of men and women are examined on the basis of the 1992 survey data on people ages 18–74 years (N = 2250). Correlations between social background factors, sexual ideas and assertiveness, optional relationships, sexual practices, orgasm, and satisfaction with sexual intercourse were calculated. To control the simultaneous effect of the variables explaining satisfaction, path analyses were conducted. Results show that young age, a sexually unreserved and a nonreligious childhood home, early start of sexual life, high education, sexual assertiveness, considering sexuality important in life, reciprocal feeling of love, use of sex materials, frequent intercourse, many-sided (versatile) sexual techniques, and frequent orgasm correlate with finding sexual intercourse pleasurable. There were some gender differences in the connections between the independent factors and satisfaction with coitus. The importance of sexuality in life, love, and the use of sexual materials were connected directly to physical sexual satisfaction among men but only indirectly among women. For women, but not for men, young age and early start of sexual life correlated with enjoyment of intercourse. The greater sexual dissatisfaction of women compared to men, which still prevails, may be due to their late start of sexual life, conservative sexual attitudes, unimportance of sexuality in life, lack of sexual assertiveness, and use of restricted sexual techniques. The emancipation of women may change these ideas and practices of women. This might lessen the gender gap in physical sexual satisfaction.

sexual satisfaction orgasm sexual attitudes love gender differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alzate, H. (1985). Vaginal eroticism and female orgasm: A current appraisal. J. Sex Marital Ther. 11: 271–284.Google Scholar
  2. Darling, C. A., and Davidson, J. K. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. J. Sex Marital Ther. 12: 182–196.Google Scholar
  3. Darling, C. A., Davidson, J. K., and Cox, R. P. (1991). Female sexual response and the timing of partner orgasm. J. Sex Marital Ther. 17: 3–21.Google Scholar
  4. Darling, C. A., Haavio-Mannila, E., and Kontula, O. (1996) Orgasmic frequency in Finland: Do age and gender make a difference? Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, J. K., and Darling, C. A. (1988). The sexually experienced woman: Multiple sex partners and sexual satisfaction. J. Sex Res. 24: 141–154.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, J. K., Darling, C. A., and Norton, L. (1995). Religiosity and the sexuality of women: Sexual behavior and sexual satisfaction revisited. J. Sex Res. 32: 235–243.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Greeley, A. (1991). Faithful Attraction: Discovering Intimacy, Love and Fidelity in American Marriage, Tor, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Haavio-Mannila, E., and Roos, J. P. (1995). Love, Generation and Gender. Paper presented at the Second European Conference for Sociology, Budapest, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
  11. Huberle, D. F. (1991). The Role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women. J. Sex Marital Ther. 17: 183–190.Google Scholar
  12. Kontula, O., and Haavio-Mannila, E. (1995a). Sexual Pleasures—Enhancement of Sexual Life in Finland, 1971–1992, Dartmouth, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  13. Kontula, O., and Haavio-Mannila, E. (1995b). Matkalla intohimoon [On the way to passion], WSOY, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  14. Kontula, O., and Kosonen, K. (1996). Sexuality changing from privacy to the open—A study of the Finnish press over the years from 1961 to 1991. Nord. Sexol. 14: 34–47.Google Scholar
  15. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., and Michaels, S. (1994). The Social Organization of Sexuality. Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Luhmann, N. (1984). Liebe als Passion, Surkamp, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  17. Morokoff, P. (1978). Determinants of female orgasm. In LoPiccolo, J., and LoPiccolo, L. (eds.), Handbook of Sex Therapy, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
  18. Pinney, E. M., Gerrard, M., and Denney, N. W. (1987). The Pinney Sexual Satisfaction Inventory. J. Sex Res. 23: 233–251.Google Scholar
  19. Roos, J. P. (1988). Beyond the happiness barrier. Soc. Indicators Res. 20: 141–163.Google Scholar
  20. Sievers, K., Koskelainen, O., and Leppo, K. (1974). Suomalaisten sukupuolielämä [The Sexual Life of the Finns], WSOY, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  21. Spector, I. P., and Carey, M. P. (1990). Incidence and prevalence of the sexual dysfunctions: A critical review of the empirical literature. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 389–408.Google Scholar
  22. Sprecher, S., and McKinney, K. (1993). Sexuality, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Haavio-Mannila
    • 1
  • Osmo Kontula
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations