Skip to main content
Log in

Ground spider diversity in the Kenting uplifted coral reef forest, Taiwan: a comparison between habitats receiving various disturbances

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of various disturbances on diversity and community structures of ground spiders in the Kenting National Park uplifted coral reef forest were investigated using pitfall traps. In each of the following five sampling sites, ten trap stations were established and were monitored once every month for a whole year: primary forest, primary forest with tourism activities, secondary forest, grassland with tourism activities and abandoned grassland. A total of 2237 adult spiders from 20 families and 110 species were collected, among which 86 (78.2%) were new or newly recorded species to Taiwan. Dominant species can be divided into two major groups according to temporal abundance variations: abundant in the dry season and abundant in the wet season. Habitat preference of 12 dominant species was assessed by comparing their relative abundance between sampling sites. Half of the species exhibited strong habitat preference and two species could only be found in habitats receiving no tourism disturbance. The Shannon–Weaver function, Simpson index and Evenness were not significantly different among the sites, suggesting that these sites had a similar community structure characterized by few dominant species and numerous rare species. However, the species composition differed considerably among the five sites. Results of a UPGMA analysis using pairwise Euclidean distance demonstrated that specimens from 50 trap stations can be divided into four major clusters: primary forest, secondary forest, grassland I and grassland II. Also, among 110 species obtained, 61 were distributed in one sampling site only, and each site had between 11 and 16 unique species. In addition to species composition, foraging guild composition also differed significantly among sampling sites. These results suggest that the diversity of ground spiders in the KTNP uplifted coral reef forest is quite heterogeneous, and any management activity should consider the uniqueness of each habitat type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balfour R.A. and Rypstra A.L. 1998. The influence of habitat structure on spider density in a no-till soybean agroecosystem. Journal of Arachnology 26: 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H.M. 1985a. A study of plant communities in Sheng-Jiau Wan Coast Forest Ecological Reserve. Conservation Research Report Number 7. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang W.C. 1985b. A study of the ecology and distribution of terrestrial molluscs in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 23. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.S. and Chen C.P. 1987. An ecological research on coral reef and marine fauna: an investigation on benthic invertebrates. Conservation Research Report Number 42-5. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.S. and Chen M.S. 1989. An ecological study of marine molluscs of Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 60. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.S. and Dai C.F. 1987. A study of coral reef and marine ecology in Kenting National Park: distribution and community ecology of corals. Conservation Research Report Number 42-4. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K.S., Dai C.F. and Chen M.S. 1988. A study of the soft coral of Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 53. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen E.L. 1996a. The effects of edge on the bird community in Fushan, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S.H. 1996b. A checklist of spiders in Taiwan. Annuals of Taiwan Museum 39: 123–156 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu Y.I. 1986. A study of insect fauna in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 36. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu Y.I., Lin M.J. and Liu L.D. 1988. The research of insects and spiders in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 48. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill T.B. 1998. Spiders as ecological indicators in the Australian tropics: family distribution patterns along rainfall and grazing gradients. Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. British Arachnological Society, Cambridge, UK, pp. 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington J.A. and Levi H.W. 1991. Systematics and evolution of spiders. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 565–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey D.T., Stout I.J. and Edwards G.B. 1998. Ground surface spider fauna in Florida sandhill communities. Journal of Arachnology 26: 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis D.J. 1980. Pitfalls in spider community studies (Arachnid, Aaneae). Journal of Arachnology 8: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai C.F. 1999. A study of the succession of coral communities in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 105. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Decae A.E. 1987. Dispersal: ballooning and other mechanisms. In: Nentwig W. (ed.), Ecophysiology of Spider. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döbel H.G., Denno R.F. and Coddington J.A. 1990. Spider (Araneae) community structure in an intertidal salt marsh: effects of vegetation structure and tidal flooding. Environmental Entomology 19: 1356–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty M. and Leather S.R. 1997. Structure and abundance of arachnid communities in Scots and lodgepole pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 95: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie I.S., Wilson W.L., Abernethy V.J., McCracken D.I., Foster G.N., Ribera I. et al. 1999. The impact of different agricultural land-use on epigeal spider diversity in Scotland. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draney M.L. 1997. Ground-layer spiders (Araneae) of a Georgia piedmont floodplain agroecosystem: species list, phenology and habitat selection. Journal of Arachnology 25: 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draney M.L. and Crossley D.A. Jr. 1999. Relationship of habitat age to phenology among grounddwelling Linyphiidae (Araneae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of Arachnology 27: 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y.J. 1996. The relationship between forest structure and bird community: a case study on the influence of the timber stand improvement program in mid-elevation area, northern Taiwan, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang C.Y. 1997. The bird community in the Tatachia area pine forest three years after a forest fire, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feber R.E., Bell J., Johnson P.J., Firbank L.G. and Macdonald D.W. 1998. The effect of organic farming on surface-active spider (Araneae) assemblages in wheat in southern England, UK. Journal of Arachnology 26: 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C.W.D., Hambler C. and Brown V.K. 1992. Changes in spider (Araneae) assemblages in relation to succession and grazing management. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M.H. 1984. Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia 62: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin R.E. 1998. Species richness and biogeography of non-acarine arachnids in Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson B. 1992. Fractal dimension of plants and body size distribution in spiders. Functional Ecology 6: 636–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd L.E. and Fagan W.F. 1992. Cursorial spiders and succession: age or habitat structure? Oecologia 92: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C.K. 1995. A comparison of bird communities between conifer plantation and natural broadleaf forest, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y.S. and Tseng C.S. 1985. Ecological study of aquatic fauna in Nanjenshan Ecological Reserve, Kenting National Park: a preliminary study of freshwater fish and invertebrates. Conservation Research Report Number 3-2. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lue K.Y. 1985. A study of limnology and herpetological fauna in aquatic areas of Nanjenshan. Conservation Research Report Number 3-1. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marc P., Canard A. and Ysnel F. 1999. Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74: 229–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelfait J.P. and DeKeer R. 1990. The border zone of an intensively grazed pasture as a corridor for spiders Araneae. Biological Conservation 54: 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelfait J.P. and Hendrickx F. 1998. Spiders as bio-indicators of anthropogenic stress in natural and semi-natural habitats in Flanders (Belgium): some recent developments. Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. British Arachnological Society, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. 1992. How many species inhabit the earth? Scientific American 267: 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M. 2000. Ecological impact of spider predation: a critical assessment of Bristowe's and Turnbull's estimates. Bulletin of British Arachnological Society 11: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M. and Benz G. 1987. Spiders in natural pest control: a review. Journal of Applied Entomology 103: 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I. and Beattie A.J. 1996. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications 6: 594–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S. 1999. Effects of IPM practices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 73: 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson R.B. 1996. Effect of forestry on the abundance and diversity of arboreal spiders in the boreal spruce forest. Ecography 19: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick N.I. 2000. Estimated species number. American Arachnology 61: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken U. 1999. Effects of short-term sampling on ecological characterization and evaluation of epigeic spider communities and their habitats for site assessment studies. Journal of Arachnology 27: 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rypstra A.L. and Carter P.E. 1995. The web spider community of soybean agroecosystems in southeastern Ohio. Journal of Arachnology 23: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severinghaus L.L. 1991. A study on diurnal raptors of Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 64. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen S.J., Shao K.T., Chen L.S. and Chen C.P. 1990. A study of the marine fish fauna in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 68. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih T.T., Tsai W.T., Shiu M.Y., Mezaki S. and Koba M. 1989. A study of the geology and dating of coral reef in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 57. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu H.J. 1995. The relationship between avian community structure and environmental factors in mature forests of mid-elevation mountain areas in Taiwan, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu K.S., Chiu W.L., Chang H.C., Lue S.Y., Lin J.T., Chu C.B. and Fang F.H. 1985. A study of forest restoration techniques in tropical forests in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 6. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su H.J. 1994. The Ecology of Plants in Kenting National Park. Interpreter Handbook of Kenting National Park, Pingtung, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg I. and Gunnarsson B. 1994. Spider abundance in relation to needle density in spruce. Journal of Arachnology 22: 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting T.S. 1993. The community ecology of avian fauna in Yushan, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping C.J. and Lövei G.L. 1997. Spider density and diversity in relation to disturbance in agroecosystems in New Zealand, with a comparison to England. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping C.J. and Luff M.L. 1995. Three factors affecting the pitfall trap catch of linyphiid spiders (Araneae; Linyphiidae). Bulletin of British Arachnological Society 10: 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping C.J. and Sunderland K.D. 1992. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth F. and Kiss J. 1999. Comparative analyses of epigeic spider assemblages in northern Hungarian winter wheat fields and their adjacent margins. Journal of Arachnology 27: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz G.W. and Unzicker J.D. 1976. Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spider. Journal of Arachnology 3: 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y. 1986. An ecological study of avian fauna in aquatic areas of Nanjenshan Ecological Reserve, Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 24. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y. and In L.M. 1992. A study of diversity of ungulate and carnivorous mammals in Kenting National Park. Conservation Research Report Number 80. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L., Hill M. and Vang E. 1992. SYSTAT: statistics. Version 5.2. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise D.H. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang P.S., Tseng C.S., Lee C.L., Chen M.L. and Yu S.W. 1990. A study of insects and their ecology in Nanjenshan. Conservation Research Report Number 83. Kenting National Park, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • York A. 1999. Long-term effects of frequent low-intensity burning on the abundance of litter-dwelling invertebrates in coastal blackbutt forests of southeastern Australia. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M.S. 1999. Floristic composition and structure of the Kenting high coral reef forest, Master Thesis, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulka K.P., Milasowzky N. and Lethmayer C. 1997. Spider biodiversity potential of an ungrazed and a grazed inland salt meadow in the National Park ‘Neusiedler See-Seewinkel’ (Austria): implications for management (Arachnida: Araneae). Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, YL., Lin, YS. & Tso, IM. Ground spider diversity in the Kenting uplifted coral reef forest, Taiwan: a comparison between habitats receiving various disturbances. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2173–2194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024591311548

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024591311548

Navigation