Abstract
The loss of biodiversity is now recognized as a global problem of significant magnitude [ Science 289: 2279]. Conservation efforts focus on measuring species diversity and distribution, assessing biodiversity threats, and managing habitats to maintain that diversity. The accuracy of measuring species diversity depends on the quality and scale of the data. Recently indirect estimates of diversity based on the skilled opinions of international taxonomic authorities were used to define 25 global conservation hotspots [ Nature 403: 853–858] and 871 ecoregions [ Bioscience 51: 933–938]. These data, originating from first-hand fieldwork and museum study, are readily available, but not necessarily repeatable nor testable. If this type of information prevails for conservation purposes, it is critical that we test the quality of this information with verifiable data at finer scales (e.g., regional inventories, specimen records, and accumulated distribution data). Here we perform such a test for the hotspots and ecoregions found in the Indo-Pacific by comparing the estimates of the expert scientists with authenticated published diversity data on flowering plants. We found a high correlation between our counts of species richness and endemism with the experts' estimates, but surprisingly found less congruity among the seven families examined. A revised list of conservation priority regions based on our plant data is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubréville A. 1960¶1997. Flore du Cambodge, du Laos, et du Viêtnam. MÚseum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Aubréville A. 1967¶1999. Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances. MÚseum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Dagar J.C. and Singh N.T. 1999. Plant Resources of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun. II.
Groombridge B. 1992. Global Biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London.
Hancock I.R. and Henderson C.P. 1988. Flora of the Solomon Islands. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Solomon Islands.
Heyer W.R., Coddington J., Kress W.J., Acevedo P., Cole D., Erwin T.L. et al. 1999. Amazonian biotic data and conservation decisions. Ciência e Cultura 51: 372–385.
Hilton-Taylor C. 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Kier G. and Barthlott W. 2001. Measuring and mapping endemism and species richness: a new methodological approach and its application on the flora of Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1513–1529.
Kress W.J., Heyer W.R., Acevedo P., Coddington J., Cole D., Erwin T.L. et al. 1998. Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1577–1587.
La Ferla B., Taplin J., Ockwell D. and Lovett J.C. 2002. Continental scale patterns of biodiversity: can higher taxa accurately predict African plant distributions? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 138: 225–235.
Lawton J.H., Bignell D.E., Bolton B., Bloemers G.F., Eggleton P., Hammond P.M. et al. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72–76.
Lovett J.C., Rudd S., Taplin J. and Frimodt-MØller C. 2000. Patterns of plant diversity in Africa south of the Sahara and their implications for conservation management. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 37–46.
Merrill E.D. 1923¶1926. An Enumeration of Philippine Flowering Plants. Bureau of Printing, Manila, Philippines.
Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Da Fonseca G.A.B. and Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.
Olson D.M., Dinerstein E., Wikramanayake E.D., Burgess N.D., Powell G.V.N., Underwood E.C. et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51: 933–938.
Panzer R. and Schwartz M. 1998. Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conservation Biology 12: 693–702.
Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Pressey R.L. 2000. Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens. Biological Conservation 96: 371–378.
Prance G.T., Beentje H., Dransfield J. and Johns R. 2000. The tropical flora remains undercollected. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 67–71.
Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.
Smitinand T. and Larsen K. 1979¶2001. Flora of Thailand. Forest Herbarium, Royal Forest Department, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
van Steenis C.G.G.J. 1950¶1997. Flora Malesiana. Series I, Spermatophyta. Noordhoff-Kolff N.V., Djakarta, Indonesia.
Wikramanayake E.D., Dinerstein E., Loucks C.J., Olson D.M., Morrison J., Lamoreux J. et al. 2002. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Williams P.H., Gaston K. and Humphries C.J. 1997. Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combining higher-taxon richness from different groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 264: 141–148.
Wilson E.O. 2000. A global biodiversity map. Science 289: 2279.
WWF and IUCN 1995. Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for Their Conservation.Volume 2: Asia, Australasia and the Pacific. IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krupnick, G.A., John Kress, W. Hotspots and ecoregions: a test of conservation priorities using taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2237–2253 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024582529645
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024582529645