Abstract
Results of three independent studies supported predictions derived from evolutionary theory: Men's assessments of sexual attractiveness are determined more by objectively assessable physical attributes; women's assessments are more influenced by perceived ability and willingness to invest (e.g., partners' social status, potential interest in them). Consequently, women's assessments of potential partners' sexual attractiveness and coital acceptability vary more than men's assessments. The proposition that polygamous women's assessments of men's sexual attractiveness vary less than those of monogamous women (because the former allegedly are more influenced by target persons' physical attributes) was also tested. In Study 1 male college students showed more agreement than females in their rankings of the sexual attractiveness of opposite-sex target persons. Target persons' flesh and bodily display enhanced this sex difference. In Study 2 men exhibited less variance than did women in their ratings of target persons' acceptability for dating and sexual relations. Women who viewed models described as having low status showed more variability than did women in the high-status condition. In Study 3 women showed more variability than men did in their ratings of 20 opposite-sex celebrities' sexual attractiveness. Studies 2 and 3 included the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI)—a measure of polygamous attitudes and behavior. Women's SOI scores did not affect the variability of their assessments in either Study 2 or 3. In Study 3 men with low SOI scores showed less variability than did men with high SOI scores. Alternative explanations of the findings are examined. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alzate, H. (1984). Sexual behavior of unmarried Colombian University Students: A five-year follow-up. Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 121–132.
Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., and Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66: 1081–1093.
Barlow, D., Reynolds, J., and Agras, S. (1973). Gender identity change in a transsexual. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 28: 569–576.
Bell, A. P., and Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. (1974). Physical Attractiveness. In Berklowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York.
Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1983). American Couples, Morrow, New York.
Bradley, J. V. (1968). Distribution-Free Statistical Tests, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Buss, D. (1989a). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 1–49.
Buss, D. (1989b). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 735–747.
Buss, D., and Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 559–570.
Buss, D. M., and Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev. 100: 204–232.
Clement, U., Schmidt, G., and Kruse, M. (1984). Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior. Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 99–120.
Cunningham, M. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi experiments in the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 925–935.
Dion, K. (1981). Physical attractiveness, sex roles, and heterosexual attraction. In Cook, M. (ed.), The Bases of Human Sexual Attraction, Academic Press, New York.
Edwards, J., and Booth, A. (1976). Sexual behavior in and out of marriage. J. Marr. Fam. 38: 73–81.
Ellis, B., and Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy. J. Sex Res. 27: 527–555.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychol. Bull. 112: 125–139.
Gagnon, J., and Simon, W. (1973). Sexual Conduct, Aldine, Chicago.
Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: implications for mating dynamics. Hum. Nature 4: 205–235.
Gangestad, S. W., and Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. J. Pers. 58: 69–96.
Glenn, N. D. (1989). Intersocial variation in the mate preferences of males and females. Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 21–23.
Graziano, W., Jensen-Campbell, L., Shebilske, L., and Lundgren, S. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 522–531.
Green, R. (1987). The “Sissy Boy Syndrome” and the Development of Homosexuality, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Hatfield, E., and Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, Mirror, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Houston, L. (1981). Romanticism and eroticism among black and white college students. Adolescence 16: 263–272.
Irons, W. (1989). Mating preference surveys. Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 24.
Jankowiak, W., Hill, E., and Donovan, J. (1992). The effects of gender and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 13: 73–85.
Kenrick, D., and Keefe, R. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behav. Brain Sci. 15: 1–29.
Kenrick, D., Sadalla, E., Groth, G., and Trost, M. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. J. Pers. 58: 97–116.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental Design, 2nd ed., Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
Kogan, N., and Mills, M. (1992). Gender influences on age cognitions and preferences. Psychol. Aging 7: 98–106.
LaPlante, M., McCormick, N., and Brannigan, G. (1980). Living the sexual script. J. Sex Res. 16: 338–355.
Lee, R. (1979). The !Kung San, Cambridge University, New York.
Lee, R., and DeVore, I. (1976). Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Lewin, B. (1982). The adolescent boy and girl: First and other early experiences with intercourse from a representative sample of Swedish school adolescents. Arch. Sex. Behav. 11: 417–428.
Long Laws, J., and Schwartz, P. (1977). Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Female Sexuality, Dryden, Hinsdale, IL.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. Morrow, New York.
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. Morrow, New York.
Morse, S., Gruzen, J., and Reis, H. (1976). The “eye of the beholder”: A neglected variable in the study of physical attractiveness. J. Pers. 44: 209–225.
Morse, S., Reis, H., Gruzen, J., and Wolff, E. (1974). The “eye of the beholder”: Determinants of physical attractiveness judgments in the U.S. and South Africa. J. Pers. 42: 528–542.
Pillard, R., and Weinrich, J. (1987). The periodic table model of the gender transpositions: Part I. A theory based on masculinization and defeminization of the brain. J. Sex Res. 23: 425–454.
Reis, H., Nezlek, J., and Wheeler, L. (1980). Physical attractiveness in social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 604–617.
Roche, J. (1986). Premarital sex: attitudes and behavior by dating stage. Adolescence 2: 107–121.
Sadalla, E., Kenrick, D., and Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 730–738.
Simpson, J., and Gangestad, S. (1991a). Personality and sexuality: Empirical relations and an integrative theoretical model. In McKinney, K., and Sprecher, S., (eds.), Sexuality in Close Relationships, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Simpson, J., and Gangestad, S. (1991b). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 870–883.
Simpson, J., and Gangestad, S. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. J. Pers. 60: 31–51.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 293–307.
Singh, D. (1995). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 1089–1101.
Spanier, G. (1976). Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior. Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 39–67.
Sprecher, S. (1989). Importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles 21: 591–607.
Stoller, R. (1982). Transvestism in women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 11: 99–115.
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York.
Symons, D. (1987). The evolutionary approach: Can Darwin's view of life shed light on human sexuality. In Geer, J., and O'Donohue, W. (eds.), Theories of Human Sexuality, Plenum Press, New York.
Symons, D. (1989). A critique of Darwinian anthropology. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 10: 131–144.
Symons, D. (1992). What do men want? Behav. Brain Sci. 15: 115.
Symons, D., and Ellis, B. (1989). Human male-female differences in sexual desire. In Rasa, A., Vogel, C., and Voland, E. (eds.), Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies, Chapman and Hall, London.
Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Hum. Nature 4: 237–269.
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind, Oxford University Press, New York.
Townsend, J. (1987). Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: Effects of increasing socioeconomic status. Arch. Sex. Behav. 16: 427–446.
Townsend, J. (1989). Mate selection: A pilot study. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 10: 241–253.
Townsend, J. (1992). Measuring the magnitude of sex differences. Behav. Brain Sci. 15: 115.
Townsend, J. M. (1993). Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 14: 305–330.
Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: An evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Arch. Sex. Behav. 24: 171–204.
Townsend, J., and Levy, G. (1990a). Effects of potential partners' costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. J. Psychol. 124: 371–389.
Townsend, J., and Levy, G. (1990b). Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 149–164.
Townsend, J. M., and Roberts, L. W. (1993). Gender differences in mate preference among law students: Divergence and convergence of criteria. J. Psychol. 127: 507–528.
Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., and Wasserman, T. (1995). Low-investment copulation: Sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 16: 25–51.
Townsend, J. M., and Wasserman, T. (n.d.). Sex differences in sexual emotions and sexual attractiveness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Udry, J. R., and Billy, J. O. G. (1987). Initiation of coitus in early adolescence. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 841–855.
Useche, B., Villegas, M., and Alzate, H. (1990). Sexual behavior of Colombian high school students. Adolescence 25: 291–304.
van den Berghe, P. (1979). Human Family Systems, Elsevier, New York.
Weinrich, J. (1977). Human sociobiology: Pair-bonding and resource predictability (effects of social class and race). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 91–118.
Weinrich, J. (1988). The periodic table model of the gender transpositions: Part II. Limerant and lusty sexual attractions and the nature of bisexuality. J. Sex Res. 24: 113–129.
Wiederman, W. W., and Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 13: 115–124.
Wilson, G. (1981). Cross-generational stability of gender differences in sexuality. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 254–262.
Wilson, G. (1987). Male-female differences in sexual activity, enjoyment, and fantasies. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 8: 125–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Townsend, J.M., Wasserman, T. The Perception of Sexual Attractiveness: Sex Differences in Variability. Arch Sex Behav 26, 243–268 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024570814293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024570814293