Skip to main content
Log in

Genebank biodiversity assessments regarding optimal sample size and seed harvesting techniques for the regeneration of carrot accessions

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small, finite populations are particularly vulnerable to diversity loss during regeneration. The regeneration of a highly outbreeding open-pollinated variety relies on estimated effective population size, via the measurement of temporal change in allele frequencies. Using appropriate estimators for dominant gene markers, effective sizes were calculated for five sizes of a mating population and two seed harvesting procedures. We have shown that, in the case of carrot regeneration, 70 equally harvested plants should provide an effective size (N e) of at least 50 plants. This value seems sufficient to limit genetic drift and to preserve an efficient level of genetic diversity within the collection. The efficiency of balanced samples (made of an equal number of seeds per plant) is compared to that of bulk samples (seeds randomly chosen among the total seed lot coming from all the plants).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astley D. 2000. The Future of European Carrot: A Programme to Conserve, Characterise, Evaluate and Collect Carrot and Wild Species. Technical progress report. Horticultural Research International, Wellesbourne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese E.L. 1989. Regeneration and Multiplication of Germplasm Resources in Seed Genebanks: The Scientific Background. IBPGR, Rome, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briard M., Le Clerc V., Grzebelus D., Senalik D. and Simon P.W. 2000. Modified protocols for rapid carrot genomic DNA extraction and AFLPtm analysis using silver stain or radioisotopes. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 18: 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero A. 1994. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J., Hernandez M.C., Bretting P., Eberhart S.A. and Taba S. 1993. Statistical genetic considerations for maintaining germplasm collections. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 673–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pace C., Monti L.M., Perrino P., Porceddu E., Spagnoletti Zeuli P.L. and Scarascia Mugnozza G.T. 1982. Theoretical aspects and practical implications of cross-pollination on seed regeneration of field crop genetic resources. In: Porceddu E. and Jenkins G. (eds), Seed Regeneration in Cross-pollinated Species Proceedings of the CEC/EUCARPIA Seminar, Denmark, 1981. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 211–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.C. 1998. Genetic structure of regeneration populations of annual ryegrass. Crop Science 38: 851–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorde P.E. and Ryman N. 1995. Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 139: 1077–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorde P.E., Palm S. and Ryman N. 1999. Estimating genetic drift and effective population size from temporal shifts in dominant gene marker frequencies. Molecular Ecology 8: 1171–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L., Jorde P.E. and Ryman N. 1998. Temporal change of mitochondrial DNA haplotype frequencies and female effective size in a brown trout (Salmo trutta) population. Evolution 52: 910–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall D.R. and Brown A.H.D. 1975. Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. In: Frankel O.H. and Hawkes J.G. (eds), Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe F., Mercier V. and Briard M. 2001. The genetic resources of the carrot organize themselves. P.H.M. Revue Horticole 430: 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney L. and Elam D.R. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conservation Biology 8: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka H.I. 1983. Conservation of heterogeneous rice populations. Rice Germplasm Conservation Workshop held at the International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, 25¶26 April 1983. IRRI, Laguna, Philippines, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackville Hamilton N.R., Chorlton K.H. and Thomas I.D. 1998. Guidelines for the regeneration of accessions in seed collections of the main perennial forage grasses and legumes of temperate grasslands. In: Maggioni L., Marum P., Sackville Hamilton R., Thomas I., Gass T. and Lipman E. (eds), Report of aWorking Group on Forages. Sixth Meeting, 6¶8 March 1997, Beitostolen, Norway. IPGRI, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., Van de Lee T., Hornes M. et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples R.S. 1988. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121: 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Clerc, V., Briard, M., Granger, J. et al. Genebank biodiversity assessments regarding optimal sample size and seed harvesting techniques for the regeneration of carrot accessions. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2227–2236 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024562701150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024562701150

Navigation