Skip to main content
Log in

The Austrian Theory of Institutions Applied to Science-Industry Relationships: The Relevance of Innovative Institutions

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution aims at using an Austrian approach of institutions to discuss specific institutional arrangements in the current working of science-industry relationships. By combining distinctive characteristics between Menger's and Hayek's research programs, we establish a typology of institutions that goes beyond the usual way to approach business institutions and allows us to identify transitory types of institutional arrangements called “innovative institutions”. We apply that Austrian approach of institutions and address its relevance to highlight some puzzling issues derived from empirical evidence. Then, innovative institutions reveal particularly suited to understand how public and private research work together in science-industry relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J. L. (1988) The Innovative Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962) EconomicWelfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. N.B.C.E.R, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1995) “Externalité et Coordination Marchande: Un Point de vue Sociologique.” CSIWorking Papers.

  • Cassier, M. (1995a) Les contrats de recherche entre l'université et l'industrie: l'émergence d'une nouvelle forme d'organisation industrielle. Thesis, Paris: Ecole des Mines de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassier, M. (1995b) “Les règles de 'bonne conduite' du projet BRIDGE Sur Les Lipases: appropriation et partage des connaissances technologiques dans un réseau coopératif.” Contribution to “Journées 1995 du CSI”, December.

  • Cassier, M. (1997) “Compromis institutionnels et hybridations entre recherche publique et recherche privée.” Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 79: 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. (1968) “The Entrepreneur, Introductory Remarks.” American Economic Review: Paper and Proceedings, 58: 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and David, P. (1994) “Toward a New Economics of Science.” Research Policy, 23: 487–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M. (1996) “The Economics of Science.” Knowledge and Policy, 9: 6–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flésia, E. (1996) “La création d'entreprises par les chercheurs publics.” Research note 4-1432, CNRS-LEST, Aix-en-Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. (1999) “The Use of Knowledge In Firms.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 458–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A. (1995) Science and Innovation: The US Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrouste, P. (1994) “Carl Menger et Friedrich A. Hayek à propos des institutions: continuité et ruptures.” Revue d'Economie Politique, 104: 851–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1948 (1937)] “Economics and Knowledge,” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed.) Individualism and Economic Order, pp. 33–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1948 (1945)] “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed.) Individualism and Economic Order. pp. 519–530. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978) “Competition as a Discovery Procedure,” In: Hayek, F. A. (Ed.) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, pp. 179–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, P. B., Lemarié, S., and Mangematin, V. (1998) “Coordination et incitations dans les contrats de recherche: le cas des accords public/privé.” Revue Economique, 49: 1129–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1996) “Markets and Hierarchies and (Mathematical) Economic Theory.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 561–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (1986) “Rationality, Institutions and Explanations,” In: Langlois, R. N. (Ed.) Economics as a Process, Essays in the New Institutional Economics, pp. 225–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (1988) “Economic Change and the Boundaries of the Firm,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144: 635–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (1995) “Do Firms Plan?” Constitutional Political Economy, 6: 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. and Robertson, P. L. (1995) Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1989) La science en action. Paris: La découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. (1996) Incentives in Basic Research. NBER Working Paper, N°5444, January.

  • Lazonick,W. (1991) Business Organization: The Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. (1976) Choice, Complexity and Ignorance: An Enquiry into Economic Theory and the Practice of Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1985) Product Innovation and User Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1988) “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation,” In: Dosi, G. and Alii (Eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 349–369.London and New-York: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. [1991 (1974)] “Friedrich von Hayek's Contribution to Economics,” In: Wood J. C. and Woods, R. N. (Eds.) Friedrich A. Hayek: Critical Assesments, vol. II, pp. 193–229. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. [1963 (1883)] Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. [1995 (1892)] “On the Origin of Money,” In: Kirzner, I. M. (Ed.) Classics in Austrian Economics: A Sampling in the History of a Tradition, vol. I, pp. 91–108. London: William Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (1991) “Processes of Integrating Science with the Market: The Creation of Technology-Based Businesses.” Contribution to the Conference “Management de la Technologie.” Paris, May.

  • Nelson, R. R. (1959) “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.” Journal of Political Economy, 67: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. and Ravix, J. L. (1996) “Les relations recherche-industrie: Analyse des procédures d'accès à des activités nouvelles.” In: Ravix, J. L. (Ed.) Coopération entre les entreprises et organisation industrielle. Paris: CNRS-Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. and Ravix, J. L. (1997a) “Academic Research and Entrepreneurship: How Public Researchers Organize the Science-Industry Relationship.” Contribution to the Conference. The Need for a New Economics of Science, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. and Ravix, J. L. (1997b) “Relations science-industrie et Institutions innovatrices.” Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 79: 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. and Ravix, J. L. (1999) “La relation science-industrie: économie de la science ou économie de l'innovation?” Contribution to the AFSE Conference on Innovation, Sophia-Antipolis, May.

  • Richardson, G. B. (1972) “The Organization of Industry.” Economic Journal, 82: 883–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. (1996) “The Economics of Science.” Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975) Market and Hierarchies. New-York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New-York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quéré, M., Ravix, JL. The Austrian Theory of Institutions Applied to Science-Industry Relationships: The Relevance of Innovative Institutions. The Review of Austrian Economics 16, 271–284 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024501109450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024501109450

Navigation