Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Horizontal Inequity in Health Care Utilization in Japan

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International comparisons of horizontal inequity in health has recently become one of the most pertinent issues in health economics. However, no previous studies have been undertaken on Japan. This omission is rectified in this paper. Moreover, we consider the dynamics of horizontal inequity in health over six years from 1992 to 1998. These dynamics have never been considered in this field. In a rigorous international comparison, though we cannot find any horizontal inequity in health in 1998, we find pro-rich inequity before 1995. The reason for this may be the reform of the health insurance system in 1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Gunji, Regional Variation in Medical Expenditure (in Japanese), Toyo-keizai-shinpousha (2001).

  2. C. Honda and Y. Ohkusa, International comparison of subjective health evaluation - USA, UK and Japan, ISER Discussion paper no. 546 (2001).

  3. M. Ii and Y. Ohkusa, Estimating price sensitivity for the medical services in the case of minor ailments using information on illness and symptoms, Japan Economic Review (2002) 154-166.

  4. N. Kakwani, A. Wagstaff and E. Van Doorslaer, Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation and statistical inference, Journal of Econometrics 77 (1997) 87-103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Shigeno, The demand for private health insurance and public health insurance (in Japanese), The Quarterly of Social Security Research 36 (2000) 378-390.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.M. Urbanos-Garrido, Explaining inequality in the use of public health care services: Evidence from Spain, Health Care Management Science 4 (2001) 143-157.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Van Doorslaer and A. Wagstaff, Equity in the delivery of health care: Some international comparisons, Journal of Health Economics 11 (1992) 389-411.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Van Doorslaer, X. Koolman and F. Puffer, Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: Has equal treatment for equal need been achieved?, Equity II project, Working paper no. 3 (2001).

  9. E. Van Doorslaer, A. Wagstaff et al., Income-related inequalities in health: Some international comparisons, Journal of Health Economics 16 (1997) 93-112.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Van Doorslaer, A. Wagstaff et al., Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US, Journal of Health Economics 19 (2000) 553-583.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Wagstaff and E. Van Doorslaer, Equity in the delivery of health care: Methods and findings, in: Equity in the Finance and Delivery of Health Care: An International Perspective, eds. E. Van Doorslaer, A. Wagstaff and F. Rutten (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Wagstaff and E. Van Doorslaer, Measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple-category morbidity indicators, Health Economics 3 (1994) 281-291.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wagstaff and E. Van Doorslaer, Measuring and testing for inequalities in the delivery of health care, Journal of Human Resources (2000) 716-733.

  14. A. Wagstaff, P. Paci and E. Van Doorslaer, On the measurement of inequalities in health, Social Science and Medicine 33 (1991) 545-557.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Wagstaff, E. Van Doorslaer and P. Paci, Equity in the finance and delivery of health care: Some tentative cross-country comparisons, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 5 (1989) 89-112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohkusa, Y., Honda, C. Horizontal Inequity in Health Care Utilization in Japan. Health Care Management Science 6, 189–196 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024492224790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024492224790

Navigation