Abstract
The Anglo-American reaction to the Lysenkoaffair has been treated primarily either fromthe point of view of the political Right orLeft, or as a consequence of post-WWIIinternational relations. None of the accountshave considered the central role of the Britishcytogeneticist and evolutionist C.D.Darlington. This article considers Darlington'srole, and illustrates how, through an analysisof his divergent reaction, it becomes possibleto see the response to Lysenko as a reflectionof internal scientific and political debatesconcerning the planning, funding, utility, andfreedom of science in post-war Britain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, Eric. 1947. Scientist in Russia. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Baker, J.R. 1939. “Counterblast to Bernalism.” New Statesman and Nation 18: 174–175.
—— 1942. The Scientific Life. London: Allen and Unwin.
—— 1945. Science and the Planned State. London: Allen and Unwin.
Barkan, Elazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism. Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States Between the Wars. Cambridge University Press.
Bernal, J.D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. London: G. Rutledge and Sons.
—— 1949. “The Biological Controversy in the Soviet Union and Its Implications.” Modern Quarterly 4: 203–218.
Blacket, P.M.S. 1953. “Operational Research.” Brassey's Annual (1953): 88–106.
Bowler, Peter. 1984. “E.W. MacBride's Lamarckian Eugenics.” Annals of Science 4: 245–260.
Brightman, R. 1936. “The Protection of Scientific Freedom.” Nature 137: 963–964.
Brightman, R. 1937. “Social Responsibilities of Science.” Nature 139: 689.
Clarck, Ronald W. 1968. J.B.S.: The Life andWork of J.B.S. Haldane. Oxford University Press.
Conquest, Robert. 1987. The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. Oxford University Press.
Crane, M.B. 1949. “The Moscow Conference on Genetics.” Heredity 3: 252–261.
Crowther, J.G. 1936. Soviet Science. New York: E.P. Dutton.
—— 1941. The Social Relations of Science. New York: Macmillan.
—— 1970. Fifty Years With Science. London: Barrie and Jenkins.
Darlington, C.D. 1939. The Evolution of Genetic Systems. Cambridge University Press.
—— 1941. “The Cleavage in Biology.” Nature 147: 544.
—— 1942a. “The Revolution in Education.” World Review, October: 33–39.
—— 1943. “Race, Class and Mating in the Evolution of Man.” Nature 152: 315–319.
—— 1947a. “A Revolution in Russian Science.” Discovery 8: 40–43.
—— 1947b. “Retreat From Science in Soviet Russia.” The Nineteenth Century and After 142: 157–168.
—— 1948. The Conflict of Science and Society, Delivered at Conway Hall, Red Lion Square, on April 20, 1948 by C.D. Darlington, F.R.S. London: Watts and Co.
—— 1968. “Determined But Lonely.” Nature 220: 933–934.
—— 1969. “Haldane's Influence.” Nature 222: 56–57.
Darlington, C.D., and Harland S.C. 1945. “Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov, 1885–1942.” Nature 156: 621.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Lysenko's Genetics.” Journal of Heredity 37: 5–9.
—— 1947. “N.I. Vavilov, A Martyr of Genetics.” Journal of Heredity 38: 227–232.
—— 1949. “The Suppression of a Science.” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, May.
Dronamjaru, K.R. 1969. Haldane and Modern Biology. Oxford University Press.
—— 1995. Haldane's Daedalus Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Dubinin, N.P. 1947. “Work of Soviet Biologists: Theoretical Genetics.” Science 165: 109–112.
Dunn, Leslie. 1946. “Review: Heredity and Its Variability.” Science 103: 180–181.
Fyfe, J.L. 1948. “The Soviet Genetics Controversy.” Modern Quarterly 3, Winter: 348.
—— 1950. Lysenko Is Right. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Gorer, Geoffrey. 1936. Nobody Talks Politics. London: M. Joseph.
Gould, Steven Jay. 1983. Hen's Teeth and Horses Toes. New York: Norton.
Graham, Loren. 1972. Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Knopf.
Haldane, J.B.S. 1928. Possible Worlds and Other Essays. London: Harper and Brothers.
—— 1932. The Inequality of Man and Other Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
—— 1938a. Heredity and Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
—— 1939. Science and Everyday Life. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
—— 1940. Science in Peace and War. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
—— 1938b. “A Note on Genetics in the U.S.S.R.” Modern Quarterly 1: 393–394.
Haldane, J.S. 1931. The Philosophical Basis of Biology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
—— 1935. The Philosophy of a Biologist. Oxford University Press.
Hogben, Lancelot. 1939. Dangerous Thoughts. London: Allen and Unwin.
Hudson, P.S. and Richens, R.S. 1946. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics.
Hutchinson, Eric. 1970. “Scientists as an Inferior Class.” Minerva 8: 396–411.
Huxley, Julian, and Haddon, A.C. 1935. We Europeans: A Survey of “Racial” Problems. New York: Harper and Bros.
Huxley, Julian. 1932. A Scientist Among the Soviets. London: Chatto and Windus.
—— 1945. “Evolutionary Biology and Related Subjects.” Nature 156: 256.
Huxley, Julian. 1947. Unesco: Its Purpose and its Philosophy. Washington: Public Affairs Press.
—— 1949. “Soviet Genetics: The Real Issue.” Nature 163: 934–942, 974–982.
—— 1949. Soviet Genetics and World Science. London: Chatto and Windus.
Jones, Greta. 1988. Science, Politics, and the Cold War. London: Routledge.
Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Harvard University Press.
Kevles, Daniel. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Harvard University Press.
King, Michael D. 1968. “Science and the Professional Dilemma.” Julius Gould (ed.), Penguin Social Sciences Survey 1968. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Koestler, Arthur. 1941. Darkness at Noon. New York: Macmillan.
—— 1969. Arrow in the Blue. New York: Macmillan.
Korol, Alexander G. 1965. Soviet Research and Development: Its Organization, Personnel and Funds. MIT Press.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A Second Front in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy, 1944–1947.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 229–250.
—— 1998. Stalinist Science. Princeton University Press.
Langdon Davis, John. 1949. Russia Puts the Clock Back: A Study of Soviet Science and Some British Scientists. London: Gollancz.
Lasky, Harold. 1939. “The Danger of Being a Gentleman: Reflections on the Ruling Class in England” (1932) in his The Danger of Being a Gentleman, and Other Essays. London: Allen and Unwin.
Lecourt, Dominique. 1977. Proletarian Science? The Case of Lysenko. London: NLB.
Lewontin, Richard, and Levins, Richard. 1976. “The Problem of Lysenkoism.” H. Rose and S. Rose (eds.), The Radicalization of Science: Ideology of/in the Natural Sciences. London: Macmillan.
Lysenko, T.D. 1946. Heredity and Its Variability. Dobzhansky, Theodosius (trans.). New York: King's Crown Press.
Marwick, Arthur. 2000. A History of the Modern British Isles 1914–1999. Oxford University Press.
Maynard Smith, John. 1992. “J.B.S. Haldane.” S. Sarkar (ed.), The Founders of Evolutionary Genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 37–52.
McCulloch, Gary. 1988. “A Technocratic Vision: The Ideology of School Science Reform in Britain in the 1950s.” Social Studies of Science 18: 703–724.
McGucken, William. 1984. Scientists, Society, and State: The Social Relations of Science Movement in Great Britain 1931–1947. Ohio State University Press.
Medvedev, Zhores. 1969. The Rise and Fall of T.D. Lysenko. Michael Lerner (trans.). Columbia University Press.
Meyer, Jeffrey. 2000. Orwell: Wintry Conscience of a Generation. New York: W.W. Norton.
Needham, Joseph and Sykes Davies, Jane (eds.). 1942. Science in Soviet Russia. London: Watts and Co.
Needham, Joseph. 1938. “Genetics in the U.S.S.R.” Modern Quarterly 1: 370–371.
—— 1941. The Nazi Attack on International Science. London: Watts and Co.
—— 1941. “Biological Science in the U.S.S.R.” Nature 148: 362–363.
Orwell, S. and Angus, I. (eds.). 1970. The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Paul, Diane. 1979. “Marxism, Darwinism, and the Theory of Two Sciences.” Marxist Perspectives 2: 116–143.
—— 1983. “AWar on Two Fronts: J.B.S Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.
Pike, R.M. 1961. The Growth of Scientific Institutions and the Employment of Natural Science Graduates in Britain 1900–1960. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of London.
Polanyi, Michael. 1940. The Contempt of Freedom. London: Watts and Co.
—— 1951. The Logic of Liberty. University of Chicago Press.
—— 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Popovsky, Mark. 1984. The Vavilov Affair. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.
Roll-Hansen, N. 1985. “A New Perspective on Lysenko.” Annals of Science 42: 261–278.
—— 1989. “The Practice Criterion and the Rise of Lysenkoism.” Science Studies 1: 3–16.
Rose, Hilary and Steven. 1969. Science and Society. London: Allen Lane.
Sarkar, Sahotra. 1992. “Science, Philosophy, and Politics in the Work of J.B.S. Haldane, 1922–1937.” Biology and Philosophy 7: 385–409.
Sax, Karl. 1944. “Soviet Biology.” Science 99: 298–299.
—— 1947. “Soviet Science and Political Philosophy.” The Scientific Monthly LXV: 43–47.
Searle, G.R. 1979. “Eugenics and Politics in Britain in the 1930s.” Annals of Science 36: 159–169.
Shipman, Pat. 1994. The Evolution of Racism. Harvard University Press.
Solly Zuckerman, 1939. “Science and Society.” New Statesman and Nation: 298.
Soyfer, Valery N. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science. Gruliow, Leo and Rebecca (trans.). Rutgers University Press.
Stepan, Nancy. 1982. The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960. London: MacMillan.
Strachey, John. 1933. The Coming Struggle for Power. New York: Covici.
Sturdy, S. 1988. “Biology as Social Theory: John Scott Haldane and Physiological Regulation.” British Journal of the History of Science 21: 315–340.
Sturtevant, A.H. 1965. A History of Genetics. New York: Harper and Row.
Sturtevant, A.H. and Beadle, G.W. 1939. An Introduction to Genetics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
Thurlow, Richard. 1987. Fascism in Britain: A History, 1918–1985. Oxford University Press.
Uvarov, P.B. 1937. “Genetics and Plant Breeding in the USSR.” Nature 140: 297.
Vig, Norman J. 1968. Science and Technology in British Politics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice. 1937. Soviet Communism: A New Civilization. New York: C. Scribner's Sons.
Werskey, Gary. 1971. “British Scientists and ‘Outsider’ Politics, 1931–1945.” Science Studies 1: 67–83.
—— 1988. The Visible College. London: A. Lane.
Whyte, R.O. 1948. “History of Research in Vernalization.” A.E. Murneek and R.O. Whyte (eds.), Vernalization and Photoperiodism. Waltham, Mass: Chronica Botanica Company, pp. 1–38.
Wilson, E.O. 1978. On Human Nature. Harvard University Press.
Wood, Neal. 1959. Communism and British Intellectuals. Columbia University Press.
Zhebrak, Anton. 1945. “Soviet Biology.” Science 102: 357.
Zirkle, Conway. (ed.) 1949. Death of a Science in Russia. University of Pennsylvania Press.
—— 1949. Death of a Science in Russia. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Zuckerman, Solly. 1978. From Apes to Warlords: The Autobiography (1904–1946) of Solly Zuckerman. London: Hamilton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harman, O.S. C.D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science. Journal of the History of Biology 36, 309–352 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024483131660
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024483131660