Skip to main content
Log in

Academic Staff Participation in University Governance: Internal Responses to External Quality Demands

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education in Croatia isconfronted with new trends and quality demandsmostly connected with Bologna processes. It isassumed that Croatian universities with theirexisting governance structures, characterisedby strong state regulation and weakinstitutional administration, cannot respondeffectively to new demands. Findings of thesurvey on conceptions of governance at theCroatian universities are presented in thepaper, with its main aim to explore academicstaff's perception of university governance.The idea of the university as a ``learningorganisation'' with strong leadership and engagedacademic staff is taken as the desired model.Mapping the opinions of academic staff on thepresent governance structures, their role ingovernance issues, and making an inventory oftheir perceptions of strengths and weaknessesof governance processes, forms importantbackground for reflections on adequatemodifications in academic governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Altbach, P.G. (ed.) (1996). The International Academic Profession. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askling, B. & Kristensen, B. (2000). Towards “the Learning Organisations”: Implications for Institutional Governance and Leadership, Higher Education Management 12(2), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berquist, W. (1992). The four Cultures of Academy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billing, D. (1998). Quality Management and Organisational Structure in Higher Education, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 20(2), 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Academic Organisation in Cross-National Perspective. Berkely/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (ed.) (1998). Universities and Globalization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1995). Through Deming's Eyes: A Cross-National Analys of Quality Assurance Policies in Higher Education, Quality in Higher Education 1(2), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopson, S. & McNay, I. (1996). Organisational Culture. In D. Warner & D. Palfreyman (eds), Higher Education Management. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press, 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (1996). Task Differentiation in Universities: Towards a New Collegiality, Tertiary Education and Management 2(2), 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjortoft, N. & Smart, J.C. (1994). Enhancing Organisational Effectiveness: The Importance of Culture Type and Mission Agreement, Higher Education 27, 429–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.F. (ed.) (1988). Leaders for a New Era. New York: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledi?, J. (1994). TQM-novi pristup kvaliteti visokog obrazovanja. Napredak 135(4), 456–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P.A.M. & van Vught, F.A. (eds) (1996). Inside Academia: New Challenges for the Academic Profession. Utrecht: De Tijdstrrom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, P. (1995). Utilising the University as a Learning Organisation to Facilitate Quality Improvement, Quality in Higher Education 1(2), 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, T. (1997). The Managerial Roles of Chief Academic Officers, Journal of Higher Education 68(3), 282–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B. (1998). University Management: Bureaucratic, Organised Anarchy or Organisational Learning? International Journal of University Teaching and Learning 1(1).

  • Neave, G. & van Vught, F.A. (1994). Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents. Oxford (u.a.): Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans, Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 833–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, B.C. (1995). Innovations in University Management. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.D. & Taylor, W.G.K. (2000). The Learning Organisation Ideal in Civil Service Organisations: Deriving a Measure, The Learning Organisation 7(4), 194–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures. London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stata, R. (1989). Organisational Learning-the Key to Management Innovation, Sloan Management Review 30(3), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G. (1987). Restructuring Universities: Politics and Power in the Management of Change. London/New York/Sydney: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovač, V., Ledić, J. & Rafajac, B. Academic Staff Participation in University Governance: Internal Responses to External Quality Demands. Tertiary Education and Management 9, 215–232 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024479803301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024479803301

Keywords

Navigation