Redefining Business Success: Distinguishing Between Closure and Failure

Abstract

New firms are believed to have high closure rates and these closures are believed to be failures, but two U.S. Census Bureau data sources illustrate that these assumptions may not be justified. The Business Information Tracking Series (BITS) showed that about half of new employer firms survive beyond four years and the Characteristics of Business Owners (CBO) showed that about a third of closed businesses were successful at closure. The CBO also made it possible to compare results of models of business survival and business success, but because of non-response bias logit models were used. Similar to previous studies, firms having more resources – that were larger, with better financing and having employees – were found to have better chances of survival. Factors that were characteristic of closure – such as having no start-up capital and having a relatively young owner – were also common in businesses considered successful at closure. Hence, few defining factors can be isolated leading to true failures. The significant proportion of businesses that closed while successful calls into question the use of "business closure" as a meaningful measure of business outcome. It appears that many owners may have executed a planned exit strategy, closed a business without excess debt, sold a viable business, or retired from the work force. It is also worth noting that such inborn factors as race and gender played negligible roles in determining survivability and success at closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Åstebro, T. and I. Bernhardt, 1999, Bank Loans as Predictors of Small Start-up Business Survival, Working Paper, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo.

  2. Audretsch, D. and T. Mahmood, 1995, 'New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function', The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97–103.

  3. Bates, T. and A. Nucci, 1989, 'An Analysis of Small Business Size and Rate of Discontinuance', Journal of Small Business Management 27, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bates, T., 1995, 'A Comparison of Franchise and Independent Small Business Survival Rates', Small Business Economics 7, 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bates, T., 1990, 'Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity', The Review of Economics and Statistics 25(4), 752–756.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Everett, J. and J. Watson, 1998, 'Small Business Failure and External Risk Factors', Small Business Economics 11, 371–390.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greene, W., 1993, Econometric Analysis, Second Edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, L., 1992, Regression With Graphics: A Second Course in Applied Statistics, Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Headd, B., 2001, Business Success: Factors Leading to Surviving and Closing Successful, Discussion Paper, CES 2001-01. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Headd, B., 1999, The Characteristics of Business Owners Database, Discussion Paper, CES 99-8. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes, T. and J. A. Schmitz, 1996a, 'Managerial Tenure, Business Age, and Small Business Turnover', Journal of Labor Economics 14, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holmes, T. and J. A. Schmitz, 1996b, 'Nonresponse Bias and Business Turnover Rates: The Case of the Characteristics of Business Owners', Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14n2, 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jennings, P. and G. Beaver, 1997, 'The Performance and Competitive Advantage of Small Firms: A Management Perspective', International Small Business Journal 15, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maddala, G. S., 1992, Introduction to Econometrics, Second Edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morel d'Arleux, C., 1999, 'Entrepreneurs' and Managers' Visions of Success in Small Firms: A Comparative Analysis', Presentation at the Babson Conference on Entrepreneurship.

  16. Phillips, B. and B. A. Kirchhoff, 1989, 'Formation, Growth and Survival; Small Firm Dynamics in the U.S. Economy', Small Business Economics 1, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robb, A., forthcoming, The Role of Race and Gender in Business Survival, Discussion paper (in press), Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies.

  18. Robb, A., 1999, New Data for Dynamic Analysis: The Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata (LEEM) File, Discussion Paper, CES 99-18. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, Center for Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1997, 1992 Characteristics of Business Owners, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watson, J., and J. Everett, 1996, 'Do Small Businesses Have High Failure Rates?', Journal of Small Business Management 34(4), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Watson, J. and J. Everett, 1993, 'Defining Small Business Failure', International Small Business Journal 11(3), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, M., 1993, 'Measuring Business Starts, Success and Survival: Some Database Considerations', Journal of Business Venturing 8, 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Headd, B. Redefining Business Success: Distinguishing Between Closure and Failure. Small Business Economics 21, 51–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024433630958

Download citation

Keywords

  • Business Owner
  • Business Success
  • Plan Exit
  • Exit Strategy
  • Business Outcome