Skip to main content
Log in

Student Involmement in University Governance: A Need for Negotiated Educational Aims?

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues for the need toincrease student participation in universitygovernance, especially in relation tohigh-level decision-making concerning the aimsand mission of tertiary institutions. The paperexamines the arguments in favour of, andagainst, student participation in universitygovernance. It also provides an overview ofthe findings of recent empirical studies on thetopic. The need for a process of negotiation inthe setting of higher education aims isemphasised and several suggestions are offeredregarding ways of increasing studentinvolvement in the aims-setting process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aviram, A. (1992). The nature of University Education Reconsidered (a response to Ronald Barnett's The Idea of Higher Education), Journal of Philosophy of Education 26, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1985). Higher Education: Legitimation Crisis, Studies in Higher Education 10, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1988). Does Higher Education Have Aims?, Journal of Philosophy of Education 22, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1990). The Idea of Higher Education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1994). The Limits of Competence. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997). Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000a). University Knowledge in an Age of Supercomplexity, Higher Education 40, 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000b). Realising the Univesity in an Age of Supercomplexity. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2000). Educating for Citizenship. Norwegian Centre for Research in Organization and Management, University of Bergen.

  • Bridges, E.M. (1967). A Model for Shared Decision Making in the School Principalship, Educational Administration Quarterly 3, 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Guilford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • CC-HER Bureau (2000). Universities as Sites of Citizenship and Civic Responsibility, Document DGIV/EDU/HE 36. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H. & Shils. E. (eds) (1982). Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H. & Goedegebuure, L. (2001). On Limitations and Consequences of Change: Dutch University Governance in Transition, Tertiary Education and Management 7, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (1998). The Idea of the University in the Global Era: From Knowledge as an End to the End of Knowledge? Social Epistemology 12, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D.L., Showers, B.K. & Imber, M. (1980). Teachers and Shared Decision Making: The Costs and Benefits of Involvement, Educational Administration Quarterly 16, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.B. (1973). Trustees and the University Community. In J.A. Perkins (ed.), The University as an Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houwing, J.F. & Kristjanson, A.M. (1975). Composition of Governing Bodies of Canadian Universities and Colleges. Ottawa, ON: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (1996). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. & Tarter, C.J. (1993). A Normative Theory of Participative Decision Making in Schools, Journal of Educational Administration 31, 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. & Tarter, C.J. (1995). Administrator Solving the Problems of Practice: Decision-Making Concepts, Cases, and Consequences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R.M. (1937). Higher Learning in America. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.A. & Skolnik, M.L. (1997). Governing Boards in Canadian Universities, The Review of Higher Education 20, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.A., Shanahan, T. & Goyan, P. (2001). University Governance in Canadian Higher Education, Tertiary Education and Management 7, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (1987). The Nature and Scope of Student Participation in Policy-Making in Academic Government. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar Current Issues in University Education of Korea and Japan. Seoul: Korean Council for University Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1983). University “Democracy” in the Netherlands. In J.W. Chapman (ed.), The Western University on Trial. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, E.J. (1970). Should Students Share the Power? Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1992). On Instantly Consumable Knowledge and Snake Oil, European Journal of Education 27, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.H. (1852). The Idea of a Uuniversity (reprinted 1982). London: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niblett, R. (1990). An Absence of Outrage: Cultural Change and Values in British Higher Education 1930-1990, Higher Education Policy 3, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obondo, A.T. (2000). Politics of Participatory Decision-Making: The Case of Kenyatta University and the University of Nairobi, French Institute for Research in Africa “Les Cahiers”, Review no. 19, November-December.

  • Peters, R.S. (1973). Aims of Education-A Conceptual Inquiry. In R.S. Peters (ed.), Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R.S. (1979). Democratic Values and Educational Aims, Teachers College Record 80, 463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1984). The Crisis of the University. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (1996). The Aims of Education Revisited, Journal of Philosophy of Education 30, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1993). Faculty, Student, and Support Staff Participation in College Governance: An Evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Canadian Community Colleges. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

  • Zuo, B. & Ratsoy, E.W. (1999). Student participation in university governance, The Canadian Journal of Higher Education XXIX, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menon, M.E. Student Involmement in University Governance: A Need for Negotiated Educational Aims?. Tertiary Education and Management 9, 233–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024428120139

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024428120139

Keywords

Navigation