Abstract
We tested whether size of habitat patches and distance between patches are sufficient to predict the distribution of the mountain vizcacha Lagidium viscacia a large, rock-dwelling rodent of the Patagonian steppe Argentina, or whether information on other patch and landscape characteristics also is required. A logistic regression model including the distance between rock crevices and depth of crevices, distance between a patch and the nearest occupied patch, and whether or not there was a river separating it from the nearest occupied patch was a better predictor of patch occupancy by mountain vizcachas than was a model based only on patch size and distance between patches. Our results indicate that a simple metapopulation analysis based on size of habitat patches and distance between patches may not provide an accurate representation of regional population dynamics if patches vary in habitat quality independently of patch size and features in the matrix alter connectivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.REFERENCES
van Apeldoorn R.C., Celada C. and Nieuwenhuizen W. 1994. Dis-tribution and dynamics of the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L.) in a landscape with fragmented habitat. Landscape Ecology 9: 227–235.
Arnold G.W., Weeldenburg J.R. and Ng V.M. 1995. Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of Western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) and euros (M. robustus) in a fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology 10: 65–74.
Fleishman E., Ray C., Sjögren-Gulve P., Boggs C.L. and Murphy D.D. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and iso-lation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology 16: 706–716.
Galende G.I. and Grigera D. 1998. Relaciones alimentárias de La-gidium viscacia (Rodentia, Chinchillidae) con herbívoros intro-ducidos en el Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Iheringia, Séria Zoologica, Porto Alegre 84: 3–10.
Galende G.I., Grigera D. and von Thüngen J. 1998. Composición de la dieta del chinchillón (Lagidium viscacia, Chinchillidae) en el noroeste de la Patagonia. Mastozoología Neotropical 5: 123–128.
Hanski I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 151–162.
Hanski I., Pakkala T., Kuussaari M. and Lei G. 1995. Metapopula-tion persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21–28.
Hill J.K., Thomas C.D. and Lewis O.T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma but-terflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 725–735.
Hokit D.G., Stith B.M. and Branch L.C. 1999. Effects of landscape structure in Florida scrub: a population perspective. Ecological Applications 9: 124–134.
Hokit D.G., Stith B.M. and Branch L.C. 2001. Comparison of two types of metapopulation models in real and artificial landscapes. Conservation Biology 15: 1102–1113.
Hosmer D.W. and Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
Jiménez J.E. 1995. Conservation of the last wild chinchilla (Chin-chilla lanigera) archipelago: a metapopulation approach. Vida Silvestre Neotropical 4: 89–97.
Jonsen I.D., Bourchier R.S. and Roland J. 2001. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Oecologia 127: 287–294.
Keyghobadi N., Roland J. and Strobeck C. 1999. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassus smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology 8: 1481–1495.
Kindvall O. 1996. Habitat heterogeneity and survival in a bush-cricket metapopulation. Ecology 77: 207–214.
King P.S. 1987. Macro-and microgeographic structure of a spa-tially subdivided beetle species in nature. Evolution 41: 401–416.
León R.J.C., Bran D., Collantes M., Paruelo J.M. and Soriano A. 1998. Grandes unidades de vegetación de la Patagonia extra andina. Ecología Austral 8: 125–144.
Mazerolle M.J. and Villard M.-A. 1999. Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abun-dance: a review. Ecoscience 6: 117–124.
Micol T., Doncaster C.P. and Mackinlay L.A. 1994. Correlates of local variation in the abundance of hedgehogs Erinaceus euro-paeus. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 851–860.
Moilanen A. and Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503–2515.
Moilanen A., Smith A.T. and Hanski I. 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. The American Naturalist 152: 530–542.
Nagelkerke N.J.D. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78: 691–692.
Pearson O. 1948. Life history of mountain viscachas in Peru. Journal of Mammalogy 29: 345–374.
Petit S. and Burel F. 1998. Connectivity in fragmented populations: Abax parallelepipedus in a hedgerow network landscape. Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, Sciences de la vie 321: 55–61.
Puig S., Videla F., Cona M., Monge S. and Roig V. 1998. Diet of the mountain vizcacha (Lagidium viscacia Molina 1782) and food availability in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 63: 228–238.
Redford K. and Eisenberg J.F. 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics: The Southern Cone. Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ricketts T.H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. The American Naturalist 158: 87–99.
Roberts D.W. 1986. Ordination on the basis of fuzzy set theory. Vegetation 66: 123–131.
Roland J., Keyghobadi N. and Fownes S. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642–1653.
Sinclair A.R.E., Krebs C.J. and Smith J.N.M. 1982. Diet quality and food limitation in herbivores: the case of the snowshoe hare. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 889–897.
Sjögren-Gulve P. and Ray C. 1996. Using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics: Large-scale forestry extir-pates the pool frog. In: McCullough D.R. (ed.), Metapopula-tions and Wildlife Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 111–138.
SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stith B.S., Fitzpatrick J.W., Woolfenden G.E. and Pranty B. 1996. Classification and conservation of metapopulations: a case study of the Florida scrub jay. In: McCullough D.R. (ed.), Me-tapopulations and Wildlife Conservation. Island Press, Wash-ington, DC, USA, pp. 187–216.
Vos C.C., Antonisse-de Jong A.G., Goedhart P.W. and Smulders M.J.M. 2001. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arva-lis). Heredity 86: 598–608.
Walker R.S. 2001. Effects of Landscape Structure on the Distribu-tion of Mountain vizcacha (Lagidium viscacia) in the Patago-nian Steppe. PhD Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, 100 pp.
Walker R.S., Ackermann G., Schachter-Broide J., Pancotto V. and Novaro A.J. 2000. Habitat use by mountain vizcachas (Lagid-ium viscacia Molina, 1782) in the Patagonian steppe. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 65: 293–300.
Wiens J.A. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski I. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 43–68.
Wilcox B.A. 1980. Insular ecology and conservation. In: Soule M.E. and Wilcox B.A. (eds), Conservation Biology: An Evolu-tionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 95–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, R.S., Novaro, A.J. & Branch, L.C. Effects of patch attributes, barriers, and distance between patches on the distribution of a rock-dwelling rodent (Lagidium viscacia). Landscape Ecology 18, 185–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024408400263
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024408400263