Skip to main content
Log in

Exogenous DNA expression in eukaryotic cells following microinjection

  • Published:
Methods in Cell Science

Abstract

Microinjection of nucleic acids, DNA, RNA, proteins, and any soluble material into living eukaryotic cells makes it possible to design experiments focused on single cells. In contrast facilitated transfer protocols requires hundreds of thousands of cells from which the expressed gene or intracellular effect must be detected within the culture. In addition to the immediate observable nature of the expressed product and intracellular reaction, microinjection bypasses the uptake toxicity associated with facilitated transfer of foreign material into cultured cells. The direct injection of material into the nucleus or cytoplasm allows the number of treated cells to be monitored and expression efficiencies to be observed directly. Microinjection of a hundred cells grown on small glass coverslips and subsequently counted for expression of the foreign material determines expression efficiency as a percentage of cells injected. The efficiency is based on detection of the foreign inserted gene product and does not control for relative promoter efficiency between constructs. The purpose is not to compare two constructs to each other but to monitor dual expression.

The creation of marker fluorescent proteins, such as the green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the same expression plasmid with a test gene allows the immediate observation of the GFP injected cells and within the same cells the positive or negative expression of the test gene. Expression of a foreign gene, such as SV40 T antigen cloned into an expression vector can be detected four hours after microinjection of the DNA. Fusing GFP into the same expression region of the T coding sequence labels T-GFP as a fusion protein with characteristic T immunological staining nuclear patterns but allows the cells to be studied without fixation through sequential periods of observation. The direct nature of microinjection allows comparison of gene expression in a variety of cells and the determination of the number of cells expressing the exogenous material in relationship to the number of cells injected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diacumakos EG (1973). Methods for micromanipulation of human somatic cells in culture. Methods in Cell Biology 7: 287-311.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capecchi MR (1980). High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell 22: 479-488.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaenisch R (1989). Transgenic animals. Science 240: 1468-1474.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd AL, Samid D (1993). Review: Molecular biology of transgenic animals. J Anim Sci 71 (Suppl 3): 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon JW, Ruddle FH (1985). DNA mediated genetic transformation of mouse embryos and bone marrow - a review. Gene 33: 121-136.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woychik RP, Stewart TA, Davis LG, D’Eustachio P, Leder P (1985). An inherited limb deformity created by insertional mutagenesis in a transgenic mouse. Nature (London) 318: 36-40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pinkert CA, Widera G, Cowing C, Heber-Katz E, Palmiter RD, Flavell RA, Brinster RL (1985). Tissue specific, inducible and functional expression of the Ed MHC class II gene in transgenic mice. EMBO J 4: 2225-2230.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd AL (1988). Gene transfer: A prelude to gene therapy. Methods in Cell Science 19: 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd AL (1985). Expression of cloned genes microinjected into cultured mouse and human cells. Gene Anal Techn 2: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reeves R, Gorman C, Howard B (1985). Mini-chromosome assembly of nonintegrated plasmid DNA transfected into mammalian cells. Nucl Acids Res 13: 3599-3604.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darnell JE (1982). Variety in the level of gene control in eukaryotic cells. Nature 297: 365-371.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pabo CO, Sauer RT (1992). Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Ann Rev Biochem 61: 1053-1095.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson PT, McKnight SL (1989) Eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory proteins. Ann Rev Biochem 58: 799-839.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ptashne M (1988). How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature 335: 683-689.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okayama H, Berg P (1982). High-efficiency cloning of full-length cDNA. Mol Cell Biol 2: 161-170.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murray EJ (1991). Gene transfer and expression protocols. Methods in Mol Biol, Vol. 7 Clifton, NJ: Human Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Southern PJ, Berg P (1982). Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter. J Mol Appl Genet 1: 327-341.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Subramani S, DeLuca M (1988). Applications of the firefly luciferase as a reporter gene. Genetic Engineering 10: 75-89.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nordeen K (1988). Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers. BioTechniques 6:454-456.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchem G, Ward WW, Prasher DC (1994). Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263: 802-805.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kain SR, Adams M, Kondepudi A, Yang TT, Ward WW, Kitts P (1995). Green fluorescent protein as a reporter of gene expression and protein localization. BioTechniques 217: 650-655.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacGregor CR, Caskey CT (1989). Construction of plasmids that express E. coli B-galaetosidase in mammalian cells. Nucl Acids Res 17: 2365-2374.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Berg P (1981) Dissection s and reconstructions of genes and chromosomes. Science 213: 293-303.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khoury G, Gruss P (1983) Enhancer elements. Cell 33: 313-314.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Laimins L, Khoury G, Gorman C, Howard B, Gruss P (1982). Host specific activation of transcription by tandem repeats from Simian Virus 40 and Moloney murine sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 6453-6457.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Benoist C, Chambon P (1981). In vivosequence requirements of the SV40 early promoter region. Nature 290: 304-310.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Serfling E, Jasin M, Schaffner W (1985). Enhancers and eukaryotic gene transcription. Trends in Genetics 1: 224-230.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heim R, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY (1995). Improved green fluorescence. Nature 373: 663-664.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Levy JP, Muldoon RR, Zolotukhin S, Link CJ (1996). Retroviral transfer and expression of humanized, redshifted green fluorescent protein gene into human tumor cells. Nature Biotech 14: 610-614.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White JA, Carter SG, Ozer HL, Boyd AL (1992). Cooperativity of SV40 T antigen and ras in progressive stages of transformation of human fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 203: 157-163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, A. Exogenous DNA expression in eukaryotic cells following microinjection. Methods Cell Sci 24, 115–122 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024401924835

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024401924835

Keywords

Navigation