Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the coordination preferences of Zn, Co, and Cd(II) with the heteroscorpionate ligand (2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-methylphenyl)bis (3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)methane

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Crystallography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reaction of the Zn, Cd, or Co nitrate salts with the deprotonated ligand (2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-methylphenyl)bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)methane (L1O) in methanol produced the following complexes: [(L1OH)Zn(NO3)2] in two isomorphs, a = 40.983(8) Å, b = 9.571(2) Å, c = 15.667(8) Å, α = 90, β = 106.38(1), γ = 90, C2/c, and a = 13.027(3) Å, b = 14.781(4) Å, c = 16.107(3) Å, α = 90, β = 105.30(1), γ = 90, P21/n; [(L1OH)Cd(pz)(NO3)2] a = 14.7476(2) Å, b = 13.5411(2) Å, c = 16.7223(2) Å, α = 90, β = 110.3840(10), γ = 90, P21/c; and [(L1O)Co(pz)(NO3)] a = 11.4240(2) Å, b = 13.4498(2) Å, c = 13.8056(2) Å, α = 105.2080(10), β = 105.8130(10), γ = 112.7470(10), P \({\bar 1}\). The Zn adopts a pseudotetrahedral four-coordinate geometry where the potentially tridentate ligand is actually bidentate with a protonated and uncoordinated phenoxy arm. The Co complex is pseudooctahedral six-coordinate where the phenoxy arm is deprotonated and coordinated. Finally the Cd complex is seven-coordinate but the metal is not coordinated through the phenoxy group that is again protonated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lipscomb, W.N.; Straeter, N. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgs, T.C.; Carrano, C.J. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 291.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Han, R.; Parkin, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9707.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kimblin, C.; Murphy, V.J.; Hascall, T.; Bridgewater, B.M.; Bonanno, J.B.; Parkin, G. Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammes, B.S.; Carrano, C.J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 4593.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammes, B.S.; Carrano, C.J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 300, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammes, B.S.; Warthen, C.R.; Crans, D.C.; Carrano, C.J. J. Inorg. Biol Chem. 2000, 6, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Park, H.I.; Ming, L. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. [online]. 2002.

  9. Hammes, B.S.; Luo, X.; Carrano, M.W.; Carrano, C.J. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  10. Kime-Hunt, E.; Spartalian, K.; DeRusha, M.; Nunn, C.M.; Carrano, C.J. Inorg. Chem., 1989, 28, 4392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shirin, Z., Hammes, B.S., Warthen, C.R. et al. A comparison of the coordination preferences of Zn, Co, and Cd(II) with the heteroscorpionate ligand (2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-methylphenyl)bis (3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)methane. Journal of Chemical Crystallography 33, 431–436 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024290316546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024290316546

Navigation