Abstract
The U.S. Geological Survey has developed a technique that allows mineral resource experts to apply economic filters to estimates of undiscovered mineral resources. This technique builds on previous work that developed quantitative methods for mineral resource assessments. A Monte-Carlo calculation uses mineral deposit models to estimate commodity grades and tonnages of undiscovered deposits. The results then are analyzed using simple estimates of capital expenditures and daily operating costs for a mine and associated mill. The daily operating costs and the value of the ore are used to calculate the net present value of the deposit, which is compared to the capital expenditures to determine whether the deposit is economic. Repetition of these calculations for many deposits produces a table that can be interpreted in terms of the probability of there being deposits that have anet present value exceeding some specified amount. Sample calculations indicate that applying economic filters to simulated mineral resources might change the perception of the results compared to presenting the calculations in terms of the expected mean gross-in-place value of the minerals.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bliss, J. D., ed., 1992, Developments in mineral deposit modeling: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 2004, 168p.
Brew, D. A., Drew, L. J., Schmidt, J. M., Root, D. H., and Huber, D. F., 1991, Undiscovered locatable mineral resources of the Tongass National Forest and adjacent lands, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 91–0010, 370p.
Camm, T. W., 1991, Simplified cost models for prefeasibility mineral evaluations: U.S. Bur. Mines Inform. Circ. 9298, 35p.
Cox, D. P., and Singer, D. A., eds., 1986, Mineral deposit models: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1693, 379p.
Drew, L. J., 1997, Undiscovered petroleum and mineral resources—assessment and controversy: Plenum Press, New York and London, 210p.
Duval, J. S., 2002, A preliminary version of an economic mineral resource simulator: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 02–380, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/of02–380
Gunther, T. M., 1992, Quantitative assessment of future development of copper/silver resources in the Kootenai National Forest, Idaho/Montana: Part II—Economic and policy analysis: Nonrenewable Resources, v.1, no.4, p. 267–280.
Long, K. R., and Singer, D. A., 2001, A simplified economic filter for open-pit mining and heap-leach recovery of copper in the United States: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 01–218, 21p.
McCammon, R. B., Menzie, W. D., Mast, R. F., and Carter, M. D., Quantitative assessments of the energy and mineral resources within eighteen Wilderness Study Areas in the states of Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, and Utah: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 91–384, 47p.
Root, D. H., Menzie, W. D., and Scott, W. A., 1992, Computer Monte Carlo simulation in quantitative resource estimation: Nonrenewable Resources, v.1, p. 125–138.
Singer, D. A., 1993, Basic concepts in three-part quantitative assessments of undiscovered mineral resources: Nonrenewable Resources, v.2, no.2, p. 69–81.
Singer, D. A., Menzie, W. D., and Long, K. R., 1998, A simplified economic filter for open-pit gold-silver mining in the United States: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 98–207, 10p.
Singer, D. A., Menzie, W. D., and Long, K. R., 2000, A simplified economic filter for underground mining of massive sulfide deposits: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 00–349, 20p.
Taylor, H. K., 1985, Cutoff grades—Some further reflections: Trans. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy (Section A: Mining Industry), v.94, p. A204-A216.
U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1987a, Bureau of Mines Cost Estimating System Handbook (in two parts), 1. Surface and Underground Mining: U.S. Bur. Mines Inform. Circ. 9142, 631p.
U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1987b, Bureau of Mines Cost Estimating System Handbook (in two parts), 2. Mineral processing: U.S. Bur. Mines Inform. Circ. 9143, 565p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duval, J.S. Economic Filters Applied to Quantitative Mineral Resource Simulations. Natural Resources Research 12, 121–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024262728456
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024262728456