Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of Responsibility, Ability and Competition

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the distribution of responsibility for prevention of negative social or ecological effects of production and consumption. Responsibility is related to ability and ability depends on welfare. An increase in competition between Western companies depresses their profitability, but increases the welfare of Western consumers and,hence, their ability to acknowledge social values. Therefore, an increase in competition on consumer markets shifts the balance in responsibility from companies to consumers to prevent negative external effects from production and consumption patterns. An increase in competition on investor markets will shift the balance in an opposite direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beus, J. W. de: 1989, Markt, democratie en vrijheid. Een politiek–economische studie (Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', The New York Times Magazine, September 13th.

  • Graafland, J. J.: 2002a, 'Profits and Principles: Four Perspectives', Journal of Business Ethics 35, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. J.: 2002b, 'Modelling the Trade Off between Profits and Principles', De Economist 150, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. J.: 2002c, 'Sourcing Ethics in the Textile Sector: The Case of C&A', Business Ethics: A European Review 11(3), 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. J., B. W. Van de Ven and N. C. G. M. Stoffele: 2002, Wat betekent maatschappelijk ondernemen concreet?, Tilburg University, www.uvt.nl/faculteiten/fww/cmo/onderzoek/bzw.html.

  • Habermas, J.: 1991, Erlauterungen zur Diskursethik (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main).

    Google Scholar 

  • HandelsZeitung: 2000, C&A zieht nicht mehr alle an, 18–10–00.

  • Hausman, D. M. and M. S. McPherson: 1996, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A., I. Woittiez and P. ten Hacken: 1989, 'Household Labour Supply in the Netherlands in the Eighties and the Nineties', OSA working paper W61, The Hague.

  • Levinas, E.: 1991, Entre nous. Essais sur le penser–al'autre (Bernard Grasset, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T. G.: 2000, 'Physician Agency', in A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse (eds.), Handbook of Health Economics, Volume 1, pp. 462–536.

  • Musiolek, B.: 1999, Gezähmte Modemultis. Verhaltenskodizes: ein Modell zur Durchsetzung von Arbeitsrechten? Eine kritische Bilanz (Brandes & Apsel/Südwind).

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, N. and L. Humphrey: 2000, Sustaining the Rag Trade (International Institute for Environment and Development, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1984, Resources, Values and Development (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1972, 'Famine, Affluence and Morality', Philosophy and Public Affairs 3, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Südwind: 2000, Das Kreuz mit dem Faden, Texte 11 (Südwind Institute für Okonomie und Okumene, Siegberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1998, Business Ethics. Concepts and Cases (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ven, B. W. van de, R. M. J. Jeurissen: 2000, 'Maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen en strategie', in Jeurissen (ed.), Bedrijfsethiek. Een goede zaak (Van Gorcum, Assen) pp. 98–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graafland, J.J. Distribution of Responsibility, Ability and Competition. Journal of Business Ethics 45, 133–147 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024188916195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024188916195

Navigation