Abstract
Some recent commentators have found problems in the scientific status of Ellis's REBT, which seem not to be present in Beck's CBT. We argue that this may be partly because they drew differently from the traditions of thought available to them, which appears most clearly in their first published articles. Beck's articles were more in the modern medical tradition, whose history forms part of the search for method leading to abstract knowledge and control that has been so powerful a feature of Western culture. Ellis was more discursive in style and drew more explicitly on the dialogic tradition, in which obstacles to self-awareness and freedom are removed by enlisting the power of reason through question and answer. Socrates and Epictetus are the classical representatives of this tradition, and Ellis's first article shows clear signs of being modelled on Epictetus. Later, however, though continuing in this tradition in his personal style and popular self-help books, Ellis also developed abstract models and methods that belong to the medical tradition. His dual allegiance has made him vulnerable to criticism from both sides.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression: 1. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 36–45.
Beck, A. T. (1964). Thinking and depression: 2. Theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 10, 561–571.
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Bond, F. W., & Dryden, W. (1996). Why two, central REBT hypotheses appear untestable. Journal of Rational–Emotive and Cognitive–Behavior Therapy, 14, 29–40.
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curley, E. M. (1978). Descartes against the sceptics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dryden, W., & Still, A. W. (1998). REBT and rationality: Philosophical approaches. Journal of Rational–Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 16, 77–99.
Dryden, W., & Still, A. W. (1999). When did a psychologist last discuss 'Chagrin'? American psychology's continuing moral project. History of the Human Sciences, 12, 93–101.
Ellis, A. (1958). Rational psychotherapy. The Journal of General Psychology, 59, 35–49.
Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.
Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: Birch Lane Press.
Epictetus. (1955). The enchiridion. Indianapolis: Bobbs–Merrill.
Gill, C. (Ed.). (1995). The discourses of Epictetus. London: J. M. Dent.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, A. A. (1986). Hellenistic philosophy (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.
Long, A. A. (2002). Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic guide to life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long. A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic philosophers (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, M. J., & Gabriel, T. J. (1987). Psychotherapy and cognitive sciences: An evolving alliance. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 39–59.
Montaigne, M. de (1991). The complete essays. London: Penguin Books.
Ong, W. J. (1983). Ramus, method and the decline of dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.
Sharp, D. S. (1914). Epictetus and the New Testament. London: Charles H. Kelly.
Sorabji, R. (2000). Emotion and peace of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Still, A. W., & Dryden, W. (1999). The place of rationality in Stoicism and REBT. Journal of Rational–Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 17, 143–164.
Stockdale, J. B. (1995). Testing Epictetus's doctrines in a laboratory of human behaviour. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 40, 1–13.
Wessler, R. L. (1992). Constructivism and Rational–Emotive Therapy: A critique. Psychotherapy, 29, 620–625.
Wessler, R. L. (1996). Idiosyncratic definitions and unsupported hypotheses: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy as pseudoscience. Journal of Rational–Emotive and Cognitive–Behavior Therapy, 14, 41–61.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York: Free Press.
Xenakis, J. (1969). Epictetus: Philosopher–Therapist. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Still, A., Dryden, W. Ellis and Epictetus: Dialogue vs. Method in Psychotherapy. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 21, 37–55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024181101796
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024181101796