Abstract
The focus of the present study was the rationality of moral behaviour and moral conviction. Assumptions like "morality pays" or "good ethics is good business" are not a priori right. Whether morality as personal conviction is also economically rational or not depends in large part on the institutional setting of a society and the likelihood that immoral behaviour will be sanctioned. The systematic approach to morality thus appears to be political economy and the institutional setting: rules and laws. However, the conditions for morality depend not only on the formal structures but also on the informal structures of rules and sanctions. Hence, the systematic approach to morality is most closely linked with the culture of a society; the efficiency of individual morality depends on social conditions. It is costly for individuals and societies to establish and entertain conditions that set clear incentives for moral behaviour. In this context, moral competencies, learning, and education play a crucial role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, 'Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organisation', AER 2(2), 777–795.
Arrow, K. J.: 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, New York).
Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Co–operation (Basic Books, New York).
Baurmann, M.: 1996, Der Markt der Tugend (Mohr–Siebeck, Tübingen).
Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan: 1985, The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Clegg, S. R. et al.: 2002, 'Governmentality Matters; Designing an Alliance Culture of Inter–Organisational Collaboration for Managing Projects', Organization Studies 23(3), 317–337.
Denzau, A. T. and D. C. North: 1994, 'Shared Mental Models', Kyklos 47, 3–32.
Höffe, O.: 1993, Moral als Preis der Moderne (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt).
Hollis, M.: 1995, Reason in Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Homann, K. and F. Blome–Drees: 1992, Wirtschaftsund Unternehmensethik (UTB Vandenhoeck, Göttingen).
Jackson, N. and P. Carter: 1998, 'Labour and Dressage', in A. McKinley and K. Starkey (eds.), Foucault, Management and Organization Theory (Sage Publications, London), pp. 51–64.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling et al.: 1976, 'Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure', in C. W. Jr. Smith (ed.), The modern Theory of Corporate Finance (McGraw Hill, New York), pp. 82–137.
Kant, I.: 1786, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, Riga).
Kohlberg, L.: 1973, 'Individual Moral Development and Social Moral Advance', The Journal of Philosophy 70(18), 630–646.
Kohlberg, L.: 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages (Harper & Row, San Francisco).
North, D. C.: 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Priddat, B. P.: 1998, Moralischer Konsum. 13 Lektionen über die Käuflichkeit (Hirzel, Stuttgart, Leipzig).
Schlicht, E.: 1998, On Custom in the Economy (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
Schopenhauer, A.: 1988, Metaphysik der Sitten (Piper, Leipzig).
Schüssler, R.: 1990, Kooperation unter Egoisten: Vier Dilemmata (Oldenbourg, München).
Williamson, O. E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gössling, T. The Price of Morality. An Analysis of Personality, Moral Behaviour, and Social Rules in Economic Terms. Journal of Business Ethics 45, 121–131 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024180732125
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024180732125