European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 199–218 | Cite as

The Effectiveness of Insider Trading Regulation in Italy. Evidence from Stock-Price Run-Ups Around Announcements of Corporate Control Transactions

  • Nadia Linciano


All developed countries and most emerging countries restrict insider trading in the belief that it may undermine investors' confidence and the integrity of financial markets.

Such regulation, however, has proved to be relatively ineffective almost everywhere, as shown by the records on convictions in the last few decades and by the pervasiveness of insider trading signalled by stock-price run-ups around announcements of private information.

Identifying illegal insider transactions may be difficult: the private information must be material, i.e. price-sensitive, and in some countries prosecutors have to prove the use of such information by corporate insiders. Moreover, the investigative powers of the enforcing Authority may be weak and the deterrence of criminal sanctions may be diminished by lengthy proceedings, especially when alternatives, such as administrative fines and civil actions, do not exist.

To date, the Italian legal system has experienced great difficulty in detecting and punishing illegal insider trading. Since they were first enacted in 1991, the insider trading rules have led to two convictions and to a very low ratio of prosecutions to allegations of illegal trading. Moreover, leakage of private information appears to be widespread, given that news about firm-specific events seems to be incorporated in stock prices long before it is disclosed in public announcements.

This paper examines the effectiveness of Italian insider trading legislation by focusing, among other things, on the stock-price run-up around announcements of corporate events. In particular, after a brief survey of earlier research on legal and illegal insider trading and on the most important weaknesses in the Italian legal framework, standard event-study methodology is used to analyse stock-price run-ups around 29 announcements of corporate control transactions in the period 1998–2000. Indicators of the “leakage” of non-public material information are then constructed, showing that securities prices follow similar patterns regardless of whether insider trading is likely to have occurred. This evidence raises questions as to the efficacy of Italian insider trading regulation and the paper concludes with some suggestions as to how it could be improved.

insider trading regulation and enforcement price run-up 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arshadi, N. & Eyssell, T. H. (1993). The Law and Finance of Corporate Insider Trading: Theory and Evidence, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bagliano, F. C., Favero, C. A. & Nicodano, G. (2001). “Illegal Insider Trading, Traded Volume and Returns: The Italian Cases.” Working Paper Presented at the Conference “Gli abusi di mercato: economia, diritto, politiche istituzionali.” Consob—Universita Bocconi, Milan, January 23, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1968). “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy. 76, 169–217.Google Scholar
  4. Beny, L. (1999). “A Comparative Empirical Investigation on Agency and Market Theories of Insider Trading.” Harvard Law School, available on the web site: Scholar
  5. Bettis, J. C., Coles, J. L. & Lemmon, M. L. (2000). “Corporate Policies Restricting Trading by Insiders.” Journal of Financial Economics. 57, 191–220.Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., Jorgenson B. & Kehr, C. (2000). “When an Event is not an Event: The Curious Case of an Emerging Market.” Journal of Financial Economics. 55, 69–101.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, U. & Daouk, H. (2001). “The World Price of Insider Trading.” Journal of Finance. 57, 75–108.Google Scholar
  8. Bris, A. (2000). “Do Insider Trading Laws Work?” Available on the web site: Scholar
  9. Brown, S. & Warner, J. (1985). “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics. 14, 1–31.Google Scholar
  10. Chakravarty, S. & McConnell, J. J. (1999). “Does InsiderTrading ReallyMove Stock Prices?.” Journal ofFinancial and Quantitative Analysis. 34, 191–209.Google Scholar
  11. Comment, R. & Jarrell, G. (1988). “Two-Tier and Negotiated Tender Offers: The Imprisonment of the Free-Riding Shareholder.” Journal of Financial Economics. 21, 283–302.Google Scholar
  12. Consob (several years), Annual Report.Google Scholar
  13. Cornell, B. & Sirri, E. R. (1992). “The Reaction of Investors and Stock Prices to Insider Trading.” The Journal of Finance. 42, 1031–1059.Google Scholar
  14. Corrado, C. J. (1989). “ANon Parametric Test for Abnormal Security-Price Performance in Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics. 23, 385–395.Google Scholar
  15. Del Brio, E. B., Miguel, A. & Perote, J. (2001). “Insider Trading in the Spanish Stock Market.” Available on the web site: Scholar
  16. Eckbo, B. & Smith, C. D. (1998). “The Conditional Performance of Insider Trades.” Journal of Finance. 53, 467–498.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, F. D. & Viswanathan, S. (1993). “Insiders and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance. 49, 1141–1148.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, J. A. (1997). “New Evidence of the Effects of Federal Regulations on Insider Trading: The Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act.” Journal of Corporate Finance. 3, 89–111.Google Scholar
  19. Gregory, A., Matatko, J., Tonks, I. & Purkis, R. (1994). “UK's Directors Trading: The Impact of Dealings in Smaller Firms.” Economic Journal. 104, 37–53.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, A., Matatko, J. & Tonks, I. (1996). “Detecting Information from Directors Trades: Signal Definition and Variable Size Effects.” Discussion Paper no. 245, LSE Financial Markets Group.Google Scholar
  21. Gupta, A. & Misra, L. (1988). “Illegal Insider Trading: Is It Rampant before Corporate Takeovers.” Financial Review. 23, 453–464.Google Scholar
  22. Holden, C. W. & Subrahmanyam, A. (1992). “Long-Lived Private Information and Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Finance. 47, 247–270.Google Scholar
  23. Jarrell, G. A. & Poulsen, A. B. (1989). “Stock Trading Before the Announcement of Tender Offers: Insider Trading or Market Anticipation?” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 5, 225–248.Google Scholar
  24. Kandel, E. & Pearson, N. (1995). “Differential Interpretation of Public Signals and Trade in Speculative Markets.” Journal of Political Economy. 103, 831–872.Google Scholar
  25. Kahan, D. M. (1997). “Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence.” Virginia Law Review. 83, 349–372.Google Scholar
  26. King, M. & R¨oell, A. (1988). “Insider Trading.” Economic Policy. 7, 163–193.Google Scholar
  27. Keown, A. J. & Pinkerton, J. M. (1981). “Merger Announcements and Insider Trading Activity. An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance. 36, 855–869.Google Scholar
  28. Kyle, A. (1985). “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica. 53, 1315–1335.Google Scholar
  29. Lakonishok, J. & Lee, I. (2001). “Are Insiders' Trades Informative?” Review of Financial Studies. 14, 35–67.Google Scholar
  30. Linciano, N. & Macchiati, A. (2002). Insider Trading.Una Regolazione Difficile. Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  31. Morse, D. (1981). “Price and Trading Volume Reaction Surrounding Earnings Announcements: A Closer Examination.” Journal of Accounting Research. 19, 374–383.Google Scholar
  32. Muelbroek, L. K. (1992). “An Empirical Analysis of Illegal Insider Trading.” Journal of Finance. 47, 1661–1699.Google Scholar
  33. Penman, S. H. (1982). “A Comparison of the Information Content of Insider Trading and Management Earnings Forecasts.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 20, 1–17.Google Scholar
  34. Pope, P. F., Morris, R. C. & Peel, D. A. (1990). “Insider Trading: Some Evidence on Market Efficiency and Directors' Share Dealings in Great Britain.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 17, 359–380.Google Scholar
  35. Seyhun, H. N. (1992). “The Effectiveness of the Insider-Trading Sanctions.” The Journal of Law and Economics. 35, 149–182.Google Scholar
  36. Tamburini, M. (2001). Affari in Piazza, Longanesi editore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Linciano
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Markets and Economic ResearchCommissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)The Netherlands

Personalised recommendations