Skip to main content
Log in

Peculiarities of the Development of Analgesic Effect during Transcutaneous Dynamic Electrical Stimulation

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of transcutaneous dynamic electrical neurostimulation on the development of analgesia was studied in behavioral and electrophysiological experiments on rats. A 30-min dynamic electrical stimulation elevated the nociception threshold in tail-flick and hot plate tests, increased the threshold of the late nociceptive flexor reflex, and decreased the number of bursts in the response. Intraperitoneal injection of naloxone (2 mg/kg) abolished the analgesic effect of dynamic electrical neurostimulation. It is concluded that the key role in reflex analgesia during dynamic electrical neurostimulation is played by the endogenous cerebral opioid system, which inhibits the nociceptive signals traveling to CNS via unmyelinated C-fiber afferents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Yu. D. Ignatov, A. T. Kachan, and Yu. N. Vasil'ev, in: Acupunctural Analgesia: Experimental and Clinical Aspects [in Russian], Leningrad (1990).

  2. M. L. Kukushkin and V. K. Reshetnyak, Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 102,No. 11, 517–519 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. E. Meizerov, I. M. Chernysh, and M. N. Dubova, Anest. Reanimatol., No. 4, 31–34 (2002).

  4. N. A. Osipova, G. A. Novikov, and B. M. Prokhorov, Chronic Pain Syndrome in Oncology [in Russian], Moscow (1998).

  5. S. S. Pavlenko, Nevrol. Zh., No. 1, 41–46 (1999).

  6. V. K. Reshetnyak, M. L. Kukushkin, and R. A. Durinyan, Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 96,No. 7, 14–16 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Bonica, The Management of Pain, 2nd ed., Philadelphia (1990).

  8. X.-H. Chen and J.-S. Han, Behav. Brain Res., 47, 143–149 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. S. Chesterson, P. Barlas, N. E. Foster, et al., Pain, 99,Nos. 1–2, 253–262 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Falinower, J.-C. Wilier, J.-L. Junien, D. Le Bars, J. Neurophysiol., 72,No. 1, 194–212 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Takeshige, Dt. Ztschr. Akupunktur, 2, 124–127 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.-H. Tian, W. Zhang, Y. Fang, et al., Br. J. Pharmacol., 124, 21–26 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. A. Ulett, S. Han, J.-S. Han, Biol. Psychiat., 44, 129–138 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Wan, S. G. Wilson, J.-S. Han, J. S. Mogil, Pain, 91,Nos. 1–2, 5–13 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. D. Willis, in: Progress in Pain Research and Management, Eds. G. F. Gebhart, et al., Vol. 2, Seattle (1994), pp. 301–324.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kukushkin, M.L., Meizerov, E.E., Grafova, V.N. et al. Peculiarities of the Development of Analgesic Effect during Transcutaneous Dynamic Electrical Stimulation. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 135, 228–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024116526855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024116526855

Navigation