Skip to main content
Log in

A Descriptive Investigation of Morality and Victimisation at Work

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to define the moral terrain attached to bullying, or work victimisation. Existing research on this problem tends to focus on the phenomenon as a personnel or organisational issue. Bullying is fairly endemic and harmful but not accorded the same priority as other forms of harassment and there is little protection in law. Much research has concentrated on the nature and extent of bullying and impact on its victims. The education sector in the United Kingdom provides fertile ground for bullying given greatly increased work demands. A descriptive case narrative is used to develop a number of ethical themes: the extent to which rights and/or individual moral conscience offer the best source of protection against bullying; the moral position and culpability of stakeholders, including policymakers, and individual witnesses to the case; implications for the development of ethical attitudes in the education sector of a developed economy; and the potentially conflicting ethical demands between government policy and individual needs. The paper concludes that inclusion of the moral dimension is vital to understanding and development of effective anti-discrimination mechanisms, intrinsic to which will be future research into discovering real attitudes towards bullying in the context of greater work pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A.: 1992, 'Holding Out Against Workplace Harassment and Bullying', Personnel Management 13(4), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, A. and N. Crawford: 1992, Bullying at Work (Virago Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, J.: 2000, Hume on Morality (Routledge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassman, E.: 1992, Abuse in the Workplace (Quorum, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, C. and S. Woosley: 2000, 'Teacher Role Stress, Higher Order Needs and Work Outcomes', Journal of Educational Administration 38(2), 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N.: 1999, 'Conundrums and Confusion in Organisations: The Etymology of the Word Bully', International Journal of Manpower 20(1/2), 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, N., R. Schwartz, R. Distler and G. Pursell: 2000, 'Mobbing, Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace', Journal of Organizational Change Management 13(4), 401–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw, J. and L. Morrison: 2001, 'Should Employers Worry?–Workplace Stress Claims Following the John Walker Decision', Personnel Review 30(4), 468–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw, J. and C. L. Cooper: 1996, Employers Liability for Workplace Stress (IPD, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D.: 2001, 'Who Controls the Teachers? Overt and Covert Control in Schools', Educational Management and Administration 29(1), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S.: 1999, 'The Nature and Causes of Bullying at Work', International Journal of Manpower 20(1/2), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, D. and M. Pastor: 1981, 'Teacher Motivation, Job Satisfaction, and Alternatives–Directions for Principals', NASSP Bulletin, 5–9.

  • Gaudine, A. and L. Thorne: 2001, 'Emotional and Ethical Decision–making in Organisations', Journal of Business Ethics 31, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.: 2002, 'Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis', Journal of Business Ethics 36, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, P.: 2000, Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness (Cambridge, UK).

  • Hantler, A.: 1994, 'Children's View of Bullying', Health Education 94(5), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, C.: 2002, 'Why Teaching is a Dying Profession', Times Educational Supplement 12, March 29th.

  • Institute of Personnel and Development: 1996, 'One in Eight UK Workers are Victims of Bullying Reveals New IPD Survey', press release.

  • Kaufman, H.: 1970, Aggression and Altruism (Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Society: 2000, Kamlesh Bahl: The Law Society Report (reported in Guardian Unlimited).

  • Lee, D.: 2000, 'An Analysis of Workplace Bullying in the UK', Personnel Review 29(5), 593–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H.: 1996, 'The Content and Development of Mobbing at Work', European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 5(2), 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe, A. and R. Olafsson: 1999, 'Scientists' and "Amateurs": Mapping the Bullying Domain', International Journal of Manpower 20(1/2), 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzio–Lockett, A.: 1995, 'Enhancing Relationships within Organizations an Examination of a Proactive Approach to "Bullying at Work" ', Employee Counselling Today 7(1), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais–Steinman, S. and M. Herman: 1997, Corporate Hyenas at Work! How to Spot and Outwit Them by Being Hyenawise (Kagiso Pretoria, South Africa).

  • McCarthy, P. and M. Sheehan and D. Kearns: 1995, 'Managerial Styles and Their Effects on Employees Health and Well–being in Organisations Undergoing Restructuring', Report for Worksafe Australia, Griffith University, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSF (Manufacturing Science and Finance Union): 1994, 'Bullying at Work: Confronting the Problem', Report of a Conference organised by MSF (MSF, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • NASUWT: 1996, No Place to Hide. Confronting Workplace Bullies (NASUWT, Birmingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithers, R. and R. Soden: 1999, 'Person–environment Fit and Teacher Stress', Educational Research 41(1), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C.: 1997, 'The Incidence of Workplace Bullying', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 7, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C.: 1999, 'From Research to Implementation: Finding Leverage for Prevention', International Journal of Manpower 20(1/2), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. and C. Cooper: 1997, 'Workplace Bullying: Myth or Reality–Can We Afford to Ignore It?', Leadership and Organization Development Journal 18, 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. and H. Hoel: 1997, 'A Summary Review of Literature Relating to Workplace Bullying', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 7, 181–191. Ritzer: 1998, The McDonaldisation Thesis (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1994, Ethics (OUP, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, C. and C. Cooper: 1983, 'Mental Health, Job Satisfaction and Occupational Stress among UK Teachers', Work and Stress 7(3), 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • UMIST: 2001, 'Survey of Employee Bullying', Guardian (3rd February), 3.

  • UNISON: 1997, Bullying Survey (UNISON, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandekerckhove, W. and M. S. R. Commers: 2003, 'Downward Workplace Mobbing: A Sign of the Times', Journal of Business Ethics (this issue).

  • Warnock, M.: 1998, An Intelligent Person's Guide to Ethics (Duckworth, UK).

  • White R. and R. Luppit: 1960, Autocracy and Democracy: An Experimental Enquiry (Harper, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, N.: 2001, 'Leadership, 'Bastard Leadership', and Managerialism', Educational Management and Administration 29(3), 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D.: 1999, 'Organisational, Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing/Bullying at Work 5', International Journal of Manpower 20(1/2), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wornham, D. A Descriptive Investigation of Morality and Victimisation at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 45, 29–40 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024116327582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024116327582

Navigation