Abstract
A national survey of sexologists was carried out in France in 1998–1999, among the individuals listed in the professional directories and the telephone book as “sexologists.” It described the sociodemographic characteristics of sexologists, their initial profession and training in sexology, sex therapy and psychotherapeutic techniques, and how they practice sexology. A total of 959 individuals were identified and surveyed. The response rate was 63%. Two thirds of the sexologists were physicians and 60% were men. French sexologists appeared to be segmented into three subgroups: (1) one-third were general practitioners, trained in sexology and psychotherapeutic approaches, recognized themselves as sexologists, and devoted 40% of their professional activity to sexology. Men were about two thirds of this group; (2) one-third were nonphysicians (including psychologists and other health professionals, such as social workers and nurses), recognized themselves as sex therapists and devoted one third of their time to sexology. Men and women were equally represented in this group; (3) one-third were specialists, with less training in sexology and psychotherapeutic techniques, and did not generally recognize themselves as sexologists. They devoted a lesser part of their time to sexology and had academic and hospital practice. Men comprised more than 75% of this group. This study raised the issue of the diversity of primary professions involved in the field of sexology and showed that sexology is a secondary professional choice for the majority of sexologists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Association of Sex Educators, Counselors, and Therapists. (1996). AASECT requirements for sex therapist certification [Brochure].
Bajos, N., & Bozon, M. (1999). La sexualité à l'épreuve de la médicalisation. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 128, 34–37.
Bancroft, J. (2002). The medicalization of female sexual dysfunction: The need for a caution. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 451–455.
Béjin, A. (1982a). Crépuscule des psychanalystes, matin des sexologues [Sunset of psychoanalysis, sunrise of sexology]. Communications, 35, 159–177.
Béjin, A. (1982b). Le pouvoir des sexologues et la démocratie sexuelle [The sexologists' power and sexual democracy]. Communications, 35, 178–191.
Béjin, A. (1990). Le nouveau tempérament sexuel [The new sexual disposition]. Paris: Kimé.
Bland, L., & Doan, L. (Eds.). (1999). Sexology in culture. Labelling bodies and desires. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
British Association of Sexual and Relational Therapy. (2002). Recognition of supervisors criteria nt[On-line]. Retrieved From http://www.basrt.org.uk/content/practice.htm
Bullough, V. (1994). The development of sexology in the USA in the early twentieth century. In R. Porter & M. Teich (Eds.), Sexual knowledge, sexual science: The history of attitudes to sexuality (pp. 303–322). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés. (1997). Le secteur libéral des professions de santé—Médecins [The private sector of health professions—Physicians]. Carnets Statistiques, 95, 1–227.
Crépault, C. (1997). La sexoanalyse. Paris: Payot.
Dubar, C., & Tripier, P. (1998). Sociologie des professions [Sociology of the professions]. Paris: Armand-Colin.
Dupras, A. (Ed.). (1989). La sexologie au Québec [Sexology in Quebec]. Longueuil, Québec: éditions Iris.
Felski, R. (1999). Introduction. In L. Bland & L. Doan (Eds.), Sexology in culture: Labelling bodies and desires (pp. 1–8). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Freidson, E. (1970). Professions of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.
Giami, A. (1999). Sexualité, psychologie et sciences humaines: que font les psychologues? [Sexuality, psychology and humanities: What are the psychologists doing?]. Pratiques Psychologiques, 2, 115–124.
Giami, A. (2000). Changing relations between medicine, psychology and sexuality: The case of male impotence. Journal of Social Medicine, 37, 263–272.
Giami, A., Fugl-Meyer, K. S., Wylie, K., & de Colomby, P. (2002, June). Sexology as a profession in Europe: Preliminary results of a European survey. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Hamburg, Germany.
Giami, A., & Pietri, L. (Eds.). (1999). Les traitements de l'impuissance [The treatments of impotence]. Paris: La documentation française.
Gilman S. (1985). Difference and pathology: Stereotypes of sexuality, race and madness. Ithaca; NY: Cornell University Press.
Haeberle, E., & Gindorf, R. (1993). Sexology today: A brief introduction. Berlin: DGSS.
Hekma, G. (1994). “A female soul in a male body”: Sexual inversion as gender inversion in nineteenth century sexology. In G. Herdt (Ed.), Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history (pp. 213–239). New York: Zone Books.
Perron, R. (1990). Médecins et non-médecins dans l'histoire de la Société Psychanalytique de Paris [Physicians and non-physicians in the history of the Paris Psychoanalytic Society]. Revue Internationale d'Histoire de la Psychanalyse, 3, 167–198.
Spira, A., Bajos, N., & ACSF Group. (1994). Sexual behaviour and AIDS. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
Tiefer, L. (1996). The medicalization of sexuality: Conceptual, normative and professional issues. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7, 252–282.
Turner, B. S. (1995). Medical power and social knowledge. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giami, A., de Colomby, P. Sexology as a Profession in France. Arch Sex Behav 32, 371–379 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024099117090
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024099117090